Cecilia Aragon
Clayton Hutto
Gina Neff
ABSTRACT
The study and analysis of large and complex data sets offer a wealth of insights in a variety of applications. Computational approaches provide researchers access to broad assemblages of data, but the insights extracted may lack the rich detail that qualitative approaches have brought to the understanding of sociotechnical phenomena. How do we preserve the richness associated with traditional qualitative methods while utilizing the power of large data sets? How do we uncover social nuances or consider ethics and values in data use? These and other questions are explored by human-centered data science, an emerging field at the intersection of human-computer interaction (HCI), computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW), human computation, and the statistical and computational techniques of data science. This workshop, the first of its kind at CSCW, seeks to bring together researchers interested in human-centered approaches to data science to collaborate, define a research agenda, and form a community.
- Julia Gluesing, Kenneth Riopelle, and James Danowski. 2014. Mixing Ethnography and Information Technology Data Mining to Visualize Innovation Networks in Global Networked Organizations. Mixed Methods Social Networks Research: Design and Applications, 36, 203.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Markus Luczak-Roesch, Ramine Tinati, Kieron O'Hara, and Nigel Shadbolt. (February, 2015). Socio-technical computation. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 139-142). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kai Zheng, David Hanauer, Nadir Weibel, and Zia Agha. 2015. Computational Ethnography: Automated and Unobtrusive Means for Collecting Data In Situ for Human-Computer Interaction Evaluation Studies. In Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine (pp. 111-140). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Tera Marie Green, Richard Arias-Hernandez, R., and Brian Fisher. 2014. Individual Differences and Translational Science in the Design of Human-Centered Visualizations. In Handbook of Human Centric Visualization (pp. 93-113). Springer New York.Google Scholar
- danah boyd, and Kate Crawford. 2012. Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly, phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662- 679.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Brooks, Katie Kuksenok, Megan Torkildson, Daniel Perry, John Robinson, Paul Harris, Ona Anicello, Taylor Scott, Ariana Zukowski, Cecilia Aragon. 2013. Statistical Affect Detection in Collaborative Chat. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW'13, San Antonio, TX. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Brooks, John Robinson, Megan Torkildson, and Cecilia Aragon, 2014. Collaborative Visual Analysis of Sentiment in Twitter Events. In Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering (pp. 1-8). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- David Lazer, Ryan Kennedy, Gary King, and Alessandro Vespignani. 2014. The Parable of Google Flu: Traps in Big Data Analysis. Science, 343(6176), 1203-1205.Google Scholar
- David Brooks. (2013, February 18). What Data Can't Do. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/19/opinion/brooks-what-data-cant-do.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Wanli Xing, Rui Guo, Eva Petakovic, and Sean Goggins. 2015. Participation-based student final performance prediction model through interpretable Genetic Programming: Integrating learning analytics, educational data mining and theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 168- 181.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Z-Q Liu, and Sadaaki Miyamoto. (Eds.). 2012. Soft computing and human-centered machines. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
- Wanli Xing, Bob Wadholm, Eva Petakovic, and Sean Goggins, S. 2015. Group Learning Assessment: Developing a Theory-Informed Analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 110-128.Google Scholar
- Dhiraj Murthy. (2011). Emergent Digital Ethnographic Methods for Social Research. In S. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research (pp. 158-179). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ashok Goel and Michael Helms. 2014. Theories, Models, Programs, and Tools of Design: Views from Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, and Human-Centered Computing. In An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design (pp. 417-432). Springer London.Google Scholar
- France Bélanger, and Robert Crossler. 2011. Privacy in the digital age: a review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS quarterly, 35(4), 1017-1042. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sangita Ganesh, and Rani Malhotra. 2014. Designing to scale: A human centered approach to designing applications for the Internet of Things. In Advanced Computing and Communications (ADCOM), 2014 20th Annual International Conference on (pp. 26-28). IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yang Wang, Yun Huang, and Claudia Louis. (September, 2013). Towards A Framework for Privacy-Aware Mobile Crowdsourcing. In Social Computing (SocialCom), 2013 International Conference on (pp. 454-459). IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yang Wang, Huichuan Xia, and Yun Huang. 2016. Examining American and Chinese Internet Users' Contextual Privacy Preferences of Behavioral Advertising. To appear in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2016). Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Trust in Data Science: Collaboration, Translation, and Accountability in Corporate Data Science Projects
The trustworthiness of data science systems in applied and real-world settings emerges from the resolution of specific tensions through situated, pragmatic, and ongoing forms of work. Drawing on research in CSCW, critical data studies, and history and ...
Human-Centered Study of Data Science Work Practices
CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWith the rise of big data, there has been an increasing need to understand who is working in data science and how they are doing their work. HCI and CSCW researchers have begun to examine these questions. In this workshop, we invite researchers to share ...
Model Positionality and Computational Reflexivity: Promoting Reflexivity in Data Science
CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsData science and machine learning provide indispensable techniques for understanding phenomena at scale, but the discretionary choices made when doing this work are often not recognized. Drawing from qualitative research practices, we describe how the ...
Comments