skip to main content
10.1145/2818048.2835197acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Which Way Did They Go?: Newcomer Movement through the Zooniverse

Published:27 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research on newcomer roles in peer production sites (e.g., Wikipedia) is characterized by a broad and relatively well articulated set of functionally and culturally recognizable roles. But not all communities come with well-defined roles that newcomers can aspire to occupy. The present study explores activity clusters newcomers create when faced with few recognizable roles to fill and limited access to other participants' work that serves as an exemplar. Drawing on a mixed method research design, we present findings from an analysis of 1,687 newcomers' sessions in an online citizen science project. Our analysis revealed three major findings: (1) newcomers' activities exists across six session types; (2) newcomers toggle between light work sessions and more involved types of production or community engagement; (3) high-level contributors contribute large volumes of work but comment very little and another group contributes large volumes of comments, but works very little. The former group draws heavily on posts contributed by the latter group. Identifying shifts and regularities in contribution facilitate improved mechanisms for engaging participants and for the design of online citizen science communities.

References

  1. Judd Antin and Coye Cheshire. 2010. Readers are not free-riders: reading as a form of participation on wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 127–130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Judd Antin, Coye Cheshire, and Oded Nov. 2012. Technology-mediated contributions: editing behaviors among new wikipedians. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 373–382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ofer Arazy, Felipe Ortega, Oded Nov, Lisa Yeo, and Adam Balila. 2015. Functional Roles and Career Paths in Wikipedia. In the 18th ACM Conference. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1092–1105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A Bechmann and S Lomborg. 2013. Mapping actor roles in social media: Different perspectives on value creation in theories of user participation. New Media & Society (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fabrício Benevenuto, Tiago Rodrigues, Meeyoung Cha, and Virgílio Almeida. 2009. Characterizing user behavior in online social networks. In IMC '09: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference. ACM Request Permissions, New York, New York, USA, 49–62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Susan L Bryant, Andrea Forte, and Amy S Bruckman. 2005. Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. ACM, 1–10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brian Butler, Elisabeth Joyce, and Jacqueline Pike. 2008. Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1101–10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Karin Knorr Cetina, Theodore R Schatzki, and Eike von Savigny. 2005. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. John Creswell. 2013. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kevin Crowston and Isabelle Fagnot. 2008. The motivational arc of massive virtual collaboration. In Proceedings of the IFIP WG 9.5 Working Conference on Virtuality and Society: Massive Virtual Communities.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sylvain Dejean and Nicolas Jullien. 2014. Big From the Beginning. Assessing Online Contributors' Behavior by Their First Contribution. Assessing Online Contributors' Behavior by Their First Contribution.(February 7, 2014) (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Nicolas Ducheneaut. 2005. Socialization in an Open Source Software Community: A Socio-Technical Analysis. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 14, 4 (July 2005), 323–368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Alexandra Eveleigh, Charlene Jennett, Ann Blandford, Philip Brohan, and Anna L Cox. 2014. Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science. In the 32nd annual ACM conference. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 2985–2994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yulin Fang and Derrick Neufeld. 2009. Understanding Sustained Participation in Open Source Software Projects. Journal of Management Information Systems 25, 4 (April 2009), 9–50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R Stuart Geiger, Aaron Halfaker, Maryana Pinchuk, and Steven Walling. 2012. Defense Mechanism or Socialization Tactic? Improving. In Proceedings of the Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. R Stuart Geiger and David Ribes. 2011. Trace ethnography: Following coordination through documentary practices. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, 1–10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Elizabeth Louise Gray. 2004. Informal Learning in an Online Community of Practice. Journal of Distance Education 19, 1 (2004), 20–35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Aaron Halfaker, Aniket Kittur, and John Riedl. 2011. Don't bite the newbies: how reverts affect the quantity and quality of Wikipedia work. In Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on wikis and open collaboration. ACM, 163–172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Christine Hine. 2000. Virtual Ethnography. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Corey Brian Jackson, Carsten ã'sterlund, Gabriel Mugar, Katie DeVries Hassman, and Kevin Crowston. 2015. Motivations for Sustained Participation in Crowdsourcing: Case Studies of Citizen Science on the Role of Talk. In HICSS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, 1624–1634. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press., NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sanna Malinen. 2015. Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior 46, C (May 2015), 228–238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Gabriel Mugar, Carsten ã'sterlund, Katie DeVries Hassman, Kevin Crowston, and Corey Brian Jackson. 2014. Planet hunters and seafloor explorers: legitimate peripheral participation through practice proxies in online citizen science. In the 17th ACM conference. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 109–119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M J Muller, D R Milien, and J Feinberg. 2009. Information curators in an enterprise file-sharing service. ECSCW 2009 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Blair Nonnecke and Jennifer Preece. 2000. Lurker demographics: counting the silent. In CHI '00: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Request Permissions, New York, New York, USA, 73–80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. C ã'sterlund and P Carlile. 2005. Relations in practice: Sorting through practice theories on knowledge sharing in complex organizations. The Information Society (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Katherine Panciera, Aaron Halfaker, and Loren G Terveen. 2009. Wikipedians are born, not made. In Proceedinfs of the ACM 2009 international conference. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Katherine Panciera, Reid Priedhorsky, Thomas Erickson, and Loren G Terveen. 2010. Lurking? cyclopaths?: a quantitative lifecycle analysis of user behavior in a geowiki. In CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Request Permissions, New York, New York, USA, 1917–1926. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jennifer Preece, Blair Nonnecke, and Dorine Andrews. 2004. The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior 20, 2 (March 2004), 201–223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Jennifer Preece and Ben Shneiderman. 2009. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 1, 1 (March 2009), 13–32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Reid Priedhorsky, Jilin Chen, Shyong Tony K Lam, Katherine Panciera, Loren G Terveen, and John Riedl. 2007. Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia. In GROUP '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work. ACM Request Permissions, New York, New York, USA, 259–268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Yixin Qiu, Katherine J Stewart, and Kathryn M Bartol. 2010. Joining and Socialization in Open Source Women's Groups: an Exploratory Study of KDE-Women. . In Open Source Software New Horizons, Pär J gerfalk, Cornelia Boldyreff, Jes'us M González-Barahona, Gregory R Madey, and John Noll (Eds.). Springer, 438.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Eric S Raymond. 2007. The cathedral and the bazaar. First Monday 3, 2 (Feb. 2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Peter Wayner. 2000. Free for All. Harperbusiness.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Etienne Wenger. 2010. Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization 7, 225 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '16: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
    February 2016
    1866 pages
    ISBN:9781450335928
    DOI:10.1145/2818048

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 February 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate142of571submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader