skip to main content
10.1145/2808797.2809407acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Network Completion with Node Similarity: A Matrix Completion Approach with Provable Guarantees

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates the network completion problem, where it is assumed that only a small sample of a network (e.g., a complete or partially observed subgraph of a social graph) is observed and we would like to infer the unobserved part of the network. In this paper, we assume that besides the observed subgraph, side information about the nodes such as the pairwise similarity between them is also provided. In contrast to the original network completion problem where the standard methods such as matrix completion is inapplicable due the non-uniform sampling of observed links, we show that by effectively exploiting the side information, it is possible to accurately predict the unobserved links. In contrast to existing matrix completion methods with side information such as shared subsapce learning and matrix completion with transduction, the proposed algorithm decouples the completion from transduction to effectively exploit the similarity information. This crucial difference greatly boosts the performance when appropriate similarity information is used. The recovery error of the proposed algorithm is theoretically analyzed based on the richness of the similarity information and the size of the observed submatrix. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first algorithm that addresses the network completion with similarity of nodes with provable guarantees. Experiments on synthetic and real networks from Facebook and Google+ show that the proposed two-stage method is able to accurately reconstruct the network and outperforms other methods.

References

  1. M. Kim and J. Leskovec, "The network completion problem: Inferring missing nodes and edges in networks." in SDM. SIAM, 2011, pp. 47--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Annibale and A. Coolen, "What you see is not what you get: how sampling affects macroscopic features of biological networks," Interface Focus, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 836--856, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Papagelis, G. Das, and N. Koudas, "Sampling online social networks," Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 662--676, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Shiga, I. Takigawa, and H. Mamitsuka, "Annotating gene function by combining expression data with a modular gene network," Bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. i468--i478, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Recht, "A simpler approach to matrix completion," JMLR, vol. 12, pp. 3413--3430, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Guimerà and M. Sales-Pardo, "Missing and spurious interactions and the reconstruction of complex networks," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 106, no. 52, pp. 22 073--22 078, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. Hanneke and E. P. Xing, "Network completion and survey sampling," in AISTAT, 2009, pp. 209--215.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg, "The link-prediction problem for social networks," Journal of the American society for information science and technology, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1019--1031, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. Srebro, J. Rennie, and T. S. Jaakkola, "Maximum-margin matrix factorization," in NIPS, 2004, pp. 1329--1336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. Zhou, H. Shan, A. Banerjee, and G. Sapiro, "Kernelized probabilistic matrix factorization: Exploiting graphs and side information." in SDM, vol. 12. SIAM, 2012, pp. 403--414.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. K. Menon, K.-P. Chitrapura, S. Garg, D. Agarwal, and N. Kota, "Response prediction using collaborative filtering with hierarchies and side-information," in Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 2011, pp. 141--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. I. Porteous, A. U. Asuncion, and M. Welling, "Bayesian matrix factorization with side information and dirichlet process mixtures." in AAAI, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Y. Fang and L. Si, "Matrix co-factorization for recommendation with rich side information and implicit feedback," in Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Information Heterogeneity and Fusion in Recommender Systems. ACM, 2011, pp. 65--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. W. Pan, E. W. Xiang, N. N. Liu, and Q. Yang, "Transfer learning in collaborative filtering for sparsity reduction." in AAAI, vol. 10, 2010, pp. 230--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Abernethy, F. Bach, T. Evgeniou, and J.-P. Vert, "A new approach to collaborative filtering: Operator estimation with spectral regularization," JMLR, vol. 10, pp. 803--826, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. E. J. Candès and B. Recht, "Exact matrix completion via convex optimization," Foundations of Computational mathematics, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 717--772, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J.-F. Cai, E. J. Candès, and Z. Shen, "A singular value thresholding algorithm for matrix completion," SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1956--1982, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Goldberg, B. Recht, J. Xu, R. Nowak, and X. Zhu, "Transduction with matrix completion: Three birds with one stone," in NIPS, 2010, pp. 757--765.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. K.-Y. Chiang, C.-J. Hsieh, N. Natarajan, I. S. Dhillon, and A. Tewari, "Prediction and clustering in signed networks: a local to global perspective," JMLR, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1177--1213, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. W. Liu, J. Wang, and S.-F. Chang, "Robust and scalable graph-based semisupervised learning," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 100, no. 9, pp. 2624--2638, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. A. K. Menon and C. Elkan, "Link prediction via matrix factorization," in Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 2011, pp. 437--452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Network Completion with Node Similarity: A Matrix Completion Approach with Provable Guarantees

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASONAM '15: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2015
        August 2015
        835 pages
        ISBN:9781450338547
        DOI:10.1145/2808797

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 August 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate116of549submissions,21%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader