skip to main content
10.1145/273133.274315acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Conceptual models and cognitive learning styles in teaching recursion

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 March 1998Publication History

ABSTRACT

An experimental research design was implemented in an attempt to understand how different types of conceptual models and cognitive learning styles influence novice programmers when learning recursion. The results indicate that in teaching recursion to novice programmers:• concrete conceptual models are better than abstract conceptual models,• novices with abstract learning styles perform better than those with concrete learning styles,• abstract learners do not necessarily benefit more from abstract conceptual models, and• concrete learners do not necessarily benefit more from concrete conceptual models.

References

  1. 1.Aho, A. V. and Ullman, J. D. Foundations of Computer Science. W. Hi" Freeman and C~mpanY' New York, NY, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Bostrom, R'. P.,'" Olfrnan, L., and Sein, M. K. The importanee'0f individual differences in end-user training: The case for learning style. In Proceedings of the 1988 A CM SIGCPR Conference on the Management of Information Systems Personnel (}988), 133-141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Cavaiani, T. P. Cognitive style and diagnostic skills of student programrners. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 22 (1989), 411-420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Dale, N. B., & Weems, C. Pascal (3rd ed.). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Davi~dson, G.V. Mateliing learning styles with teaching Styles: is ~it a useful concept? Performance and I~truction 29,'4 (1990), 36-38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.du Boula~, B., O'Shea, T., and Monk, J. The black box inside ~e glass box: presenting cbrnputing concepts to novlees, lnternatibnal Journal of Man-Machine Studies 14 (i98i), 237-249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Gentner, D. Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7 (1983), 155-170.'Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. 8.Greer, J. E. Empirical Comparison of Techniques for Teaching Redtksion in introductory Computer Science. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Jagodzinski, 'A.' P. A theoretical basis for the representation (if on-line computer systems to naive users. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 18 (1983), 215-252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. 10.Kemeny, J. G. and Kurtz, T. E. Back to BASIC: The History, Corruption and Future of the Language. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Koffrnan, E. B. Pascal (4th ed.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Kolb, D. A. Experiential Learning. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Kolb, D. A. Learning Style Inventory. MeBer and' Company, Boston, MA, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Kurland, D. M. and Pea, R. D. Children's mental models of recursive LOGO programs. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (1983), Session 4, 1-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Mayer, R. E. Can advance organizers influence meaning~l learning? Review of Educational Research 49 (1979), 371-383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. 16.Mayer, R. E. The psychology of how novices learn computer programming. Computing Surveys 13 (1981), 121-141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.Mayer, R. E. Using conceptual models to teach BASIC computer programming. Journal of Educational Psychology 80, 3 (1988), 291-298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Norman, D. A. Some observation of mental models, in D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models (pp. 7-14). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Pirolli, P.L. and Anderson, J. R. The role of learning from examples in the acquisition of reeursive programming skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology 39 (1985), 240-272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. 20.Sein, M. K. and Bostrom, R. P. Individual differences and conceptual models in training novices users. Human-Computer Interaction 4 (1989), 197-229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.Smith, D. M. and Kolb, D. A. User's Guide for the Learning Style Inventory: A Manual for Teachers and Trainers. McBer and Company, Boston, MA, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.van der Veer, G. C. and Felt, M. A. M. Development of mental models of an office system: A field study on an introductory course. In G.C. van der Veer & G. Mulder (F_~.), Human-Computer ~ Interaction: Psychonomic Aspects (pp. 251-272). Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.van Merrienboer, I. J. G. Instructional strategies for teaching computer programming: Interactions with the cognitive style refleetion-impulsivity. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 23, 1 (1990), 45- 52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Conceptual models and cognitive learning styles in teaching recursion

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGCSE '98: Proceedings of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
          March 1998
          396 pages
          ISBN:0897919947
          DOI:10.1145/273133

          Copyright © 1998 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 March 1998

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          SIGCSE '98 Paper Acceptance Rate72of201submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

          Upcoming Conference

          SIGCSE Virtual 2024
          SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
          November 30 - December 1, 2024
          Virtual Event , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader