skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702294acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Success & Scale in a Data-Producing Organization: The Socio-Technical Evolution of OpenStreetMap in Response to Humanitarian Events

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a volunteer-driven, globally distributed organization whose members work to create a common digital map of the world. OSM embraces ideals of open data, and to that end innovates both socially and technically to develop practices and processes for coordinated operation. This paper provides a brief history of OSM and then, through quantitative and qualitative examination of the OSM database and other sites of articulation work, examines organizational growth through the lens of two catastrophes that spurred enormous humanitarian relief responses-the 2010 Haiti Earthquake and the 2013 Typhoon Yolanda. The temporally- and geographically- constrained events scope analysis for what is a rapidly maturing, whole-planet operation. The first disaster identified how OSM could support other organizations responding to the event. However, to achieve this, OSM has had to refine mechanisms of collaboration around map creation, which were tested again in Typhoon Yolanda. The transformation of work between these two events yields insights into the organizational development of large, data-producing online organizations.

References

  1. Bernstein, M., Little, G., Miller, R., Hartmann, B., Ackerman, M., Karger, D., Crowell, D., Panovich, K. Soylent: a word processor with a crowd inside. Proc. of UIST (2010), 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beschastnikh, I., Kriplean, T., McDonald, D. W. Wikipedian Self-Governance in Action: Motivating the Policy Lens. Proc of ICWSM. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bietz, M., Ferro, T., Lee, C. Sustaining the development of cyberinfrastructure: an organization adapting to change. Proc of CSCW (2012), 901--910. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Budhathoki, N., Haythornthwaite, C. Motivation for open collaboration crowd and community models and the case of OpenStreetMap. American Behavioral Scientist 54, 5 (2013), 548--575.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chilton, S. Crowdsourcing is radically changing the geodata landscape: case study of OpenStreetMap. Proc. of UK Cartographic Conf, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fairhurst, R. OpenStreetMap opens up to more contributors with easy "add a note" feature. OSM Foundation Blog. (4/29/13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Forte, A, Bruckman, A. Scaling consensus: Increasing decentralization in Wikipedia governance. Proc of HICSS, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Haklay, M. How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap & Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design 34, 4 (2010), 682--703.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Haklay, M., Antoniou, V., Basiouka, S., R Soden, R., Mooney, P. Crowdsourced Geographic Information Use in Government. World Bank. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Halfaker, A., Geiger, R. S., Morgan, J. T., Riedl, J. The rise and decline of an open collaboration system: How Wikipedia's reaction to popularity is causing its decline. American Behavioral Scientist. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hecht, B., Schöning, J., Erickson, T., Preidhorsky, R. Geographic Human Interaction. Ext. Proc, of CHI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. HOT Tasking Manager. Typhoon Haiyan. http://tasks.hotosm.org/job/350.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hristova, D., Quattrone, G., Mashhadi, A. J., Capra, L. The Life of the Party: Impact of Social Mapping in OpenStreetMap. Proc of ICWSM (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Human Rights Watch (HRW). World Report 2011. Seven Stories Press (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. ITO World Blog. January 20, 2010. http://itoworld.blogspot.com/2010/01/mapping-crisisopenstreetmap-response.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Keegan, B, Gergle, D, Contractor, N. Hot off the wiki: dynamics, practices, and structures in Wikipedia's coverage of the Tohoku catastrophes. Proc of WikiSym, (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lam, STK., Uduwage, A., Dong, Z., Sen, S., Musicant, D. R., Terveen, L., Riedl, J. WP: clubhouse: An exploration of Wikipedia's gender imbalance. Symposium on Wikis & Open Collaboration. (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lave, J., Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge Univ, (1991), 138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Lin, Y. A qualitative enquiry into OpenStreetMap making. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 17, 1 (2011), 53--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mileti, D.S. 1999. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the US. Joseph Henry D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mooney, P, & Corcoran, P. How social is OSM. In Proc of AGILE Conf on GIS. 2012. (24--27).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. OpenStreetMap Development. http://pierzen.dev.openstreetmap.org/hot/leaflet/OSMCompare-before-after-philippines.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. OSM Foundation. We are Changing the License. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Priedhorsky, R., Jordan, B., Terveen, L. How a personalized geowiki can help bicyclists share information more effectively. WikiSym, (2007), 93--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Schmidt, K, & L Bannon. "Taking CSCW seriously." Journal of CSCW, 1.1--2 (1992): 7--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmidt, M., Klettner, S. Gender and Experience-Related Motivators for Contributing to OSM. ACTIVITY (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Simonite, T. The Decline of Wikipedia. MIT Technology Review. October 22, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Soden, R., Budhathoki, N., Palen, L. Resilience-Building and the Crisis Informatics Agenda: Lessons Learned from Open Cities Kathmandu. ISCRAM, (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Soden R., Palen, L. From crowdsourcing to community mapping: the post-earthquake work of OpenStreetMap Haiti. In Proc. of COOP, (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Starbird, K. Palen, L. "Voluntweeters": self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. Proc. of CHI, (2011), 1071--1080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Starbird,K, Palen,L. Working & Sustaining the Virtual "Disaster Desk." Proc. of CSCW (2013), 491--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. United Nations Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) 2013. https://docs.unocha.org/sites/dms/CAP/SRP_20132014_Philippines_Typhoon_Haiyan.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. USAID Yolanda Factsheet http://www.usaid.gov/haiyan/fy14/fs20Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. White, J., Palen, L., Anderson, K. M. Digital mobilization in disaster response: the work & selforganization of on-line pet advocates in response to hurricane sandy. Proc. of CSCW, (2014), 866--876. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Success & Scale in a Data-Producing Organization: The Socio-Technical Evolution of OpenStreetMap in Response to Humanitarian Events

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2015
        4290 pages
        ISBN:9781450331456
        DOI:10.1145/2702123

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 April 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader