skip to main content
10.1145/2677199.2680604acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fl.UIs: Liquid-Mediated Vision Based Touch Surfaces

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 January 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Fluid User Interfaces (Fl.UIs) are liquid-based touch surfaces that use computer vision to detect and interpret a range of tactile user inputs. While Fl.UIs have less input resolution than digital touch screens, they provide an excellent low-cost solution for rapidly prototyping non-rectilinear screen designs as well as exploring novel surface interaction techniques. Fabricated on a laser cutter using low-cost materials, Fl.UIs use unique shape outlines to displace an internal colored liquid to regions-of-interest for a camera. This paper presents a set of software tools that help users rapidly design, fabricate and author interactions with Fl.UIs. The robust construction and an unpowered surface makes Fl.UIs well-suited for outdoor and public installations. Our Fl.UIs prototyping tool encourages these uncommon "screens" to emerge in complex environments (i.e. urban spaces, benches, tables, fountains, sidewalks).

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

tei0333.mp4

mp4

36.1 MB

p85.mp4

mp4

77 MB

References

  1. Bränzel, A., Holz, C., Hoffmann, D., Schmidt, D., Knaust, M., Läuhne, P., Meusel, R., Richter, S., and Baudisch, P. Gravityspace: Tracking users and their poses in a smart room using a pressure-sensing floor. In CHI '13, ACM Press (2013), 725--734. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Follmer, S., Johnson, M., Adelson, E., and Ishii, H. deForm: An interactive malleable surface for capturing 2.5D arbitrary objects, tools and touch. In UIST '11, ACM Press (2011), 527--536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Han, J. Y. Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. In UIST '05, ACM Press (2005), 115--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Harrison, C., and Hudson, S. E. Providing dynamically changeable physical buttons on a visual display. In CHI '09, ACM Press (2009), 299--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hartmann, B., and Wright, P. K. Designing bespoke interactive devices. Computer 46, 8 (2013), 85--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hennecke, F., Berwein, F., and Butz, A. Optical pressure sensing for tangible user interfaces. In Proc. ITS '11, ACM Press (2011), 45--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hilliges, O., Kim, D., and Izadi, S. Creating malleable interactive surfaces using liquid displacement sensing. In Proc. Tabletop 2008, IEEE Press (2008), 157160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jansen, Y. Mudpad: fluid haptics for multitouch surfaces. In Extended Abstracts of CHI '10, ACM (2010), 43514356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lehni, J., and Puckey, J. Paper.js, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Matsushita, N., and Rekimoto, J. HoloWall: designing a finger, hand, body, and object sensitive wall. In UIST '97, ACM Press (1997), 209--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Maynes-Aminzade, D., Winograd, T., and Igarashi, T. Eyepatch: prototyping camera-based interaction through examples. In UIST '07, ACM Press (2007), 33--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Moeller, J., and Kerne, A. Zerotouch: An optical multi-touch and free-air interaction architecture. In CHI '12, ACM Press (2012), 2165--2174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Murugappan, S., Vinayak, Elmqvist, N., and Ramani, K. Extended multitouch: Recovering touch posture and differentiating users using a depth camera. In UIST '12, ACM Press (2012), 487--496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Swain, M. J., and Ballard, D. H. Color indexing. Int'l J. Computer Vision '91, 1 (1991), 1132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Sylvester, A., Dring, T., and Schmidt, A. Liquids, smoke, and soap bubbles: reflections on materials for ephemeral user interfaces. In TEI '10, ACM (2010), 269--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Fl.UIs: Liquid-Mediated Vision Based Touch Surfaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '15: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
      January 2015
      766 pages
      ISBN:9781450333054
      DOI:10.1145/2677199

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 January 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      TEI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate63of222submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader