skip to main content
10.1145/2666310.2666433acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Placing user-generated content on the map with confidence

Published:04 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe a method that predicts the location of user-generated content using textual features alone. Unlike previous methods for geotagging text documents, our proposed method is not sensitive to how we discretize space. We also discover that spatial resolution has an impact on the prediction accuracy, which allows us to trade-off the spatial resolution of the predicted location against our confidence about its accuracy. Our method can be used to estimate the error in document's predicted location, enabling us to filter out poor quality predictions. We evaluate the proposed method extensively on user-generated content collected from two different social media sites, Flickr and Twitter. Our evaluation examines its performance on the geotagging task and with respect to different parameters. We achieve state-of-the-art results for all three tasks: location prediction, error estimation and result ranking and also provide a theoretical explanation of the effect of spatial resolution factor on geotagging accuracy. Our findings provide valuable insights into the design of geotagging systems and their quality control.

References

  1. K. H. Brodersen, C. S. Ong, K. E. Stephan, and J. M. Buhmann. The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. In Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2010 20th International Conference on, pages 3121--3124. IEEE, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. J. Crandall, L. Backstrom, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Mapping the world's photos. In WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, pages 761--770, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B. Han, P. Cook, and T. Baldwin. Text-based twitter user geolocation prediction. J. Artif. Intell. Res.(JAIR), 49: 451--500, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Hauff, B. Thomee, and M. Trevisiol. Working notes for the placing task at mediaeval 2013. In MediaEval 2013 Workshop, Barcelona, Spain, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Kinsella, V. Murdock, and N. O'Hare. I'm eating a sandwich in glasgow: modeling locations with tweets. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Search and mining user-generated contents, pages 61--68. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. T. Rattenbury and M. Naaman. Methods for extracting place semantics from Flickr tags. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 3(1): 1, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. O. Van Laere, S. Schockaert, and B. Dhoedt. Georeferencing flickr resources based on textual meta-data. Information Sciences, 238: 52--74, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. P. Wand and M. C. Jones. Kernel smoothing, volume 60. Crc Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Placing user-generated content on the map with confidence

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGSPATIAL '14: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
      November 2014
      651 pages
      ISBN:9781450331319
      DOI:10.1145/2666310

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 November 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGSPATIAL '14 Paper Acceptance Rate39of184submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader