skip to main content
10.1145/2598510.2600888acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Making wellbeing: a process of user-centered design

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We consider the role of making in current HCI design practices and how it may affect the wellbeing of those who participate in these processes. Through an exploration of psychological concepts of wellbeing and their connection to making experiences, we suggest that making can facilitate and support both hedonic and eudemonic facets of wellbeing. We illustrate this in the context of three case studies that engaged people in creative making activities as part of user-centered design processes. Based on our experiences, we argue that researchers ought to be mindful of the potential impact our design processes have on our participants and provide considerations for those designing for and with participants where wellbeing is a concern.

References

  1. Bardzell, S., Rosner, D.K., and Bardzell, J. Crafting quality in design. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference on DIS '12, ACM Press (2012), 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bossen, C., Dindler, C., and Iversen, O.S. Impediments to user gains. Proc. PDC '12, ACM Press (2012), 31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brown, K.W. and Ryan, R.M. The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, (2003), 822--848.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Clarke, R., Wright, P., Balaam, M., and Mccarthy, J. Digital portraits: Photo-sharing after domestic violence. Proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 2517--2526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Compton, W.C., Smith, M.L., Cornish, K.A., and Qualls, D.L. Factor structure of mental health measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71, 2 (1996), 406--413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Dalley, T. Art as Therapy: An Introduction to the Use of Art as a Therapeutic Technique. Routledge, New York, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dalsgaard, P. and Eriksson, E. Large-scale participation: A case study of a participatory approach to developing a new public library. Proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 399--408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. Hedonia, Eudaimonia, and Well-being: An Introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies 9, (2008), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Diener, E., Lucas, R.E., and Scollon, C.N. Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist 61, 4 (2006), 305--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ehn, P. Participation in design things. Proc. PDC '08, (2008), 92--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gauntlett, D. Making is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity from DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Polity Press, UK, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodman, E. and Rosner, D. From garments to gardens. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '11, ACM Press (2011), 2257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Guha, M.L., Druin, A., and Fails, J.A. Investigating the impact of design processes on children. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC '10, ACM Press (2010), 198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Harris, P.B. and Keady, J. Editorial: Dementia. The International Journal of Social Research and Practice 5, 1 (2006), 5--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayes, G.R. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18, 3 (2011), 1--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Russel Sage Foundation, New York, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kubovy, M. On the Pleasure of the Mind. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwarz, eds., The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Russel Sage Foundation, New York, 1999, 134--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuznetsov, S., Trutoiu, L., Kute, C., Howley, I., Siewiorek, D., and Paulos, E. Breaking boundaries: Mentoring with wearable computing. Proc. CHI '11, ACM (2011), 2957--2966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewinsohn, P.M. and Amenson, C.S. Some relations between pleasant and unpleasant mood-related events and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 87, 6 (1978), 644--654.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Liebman, M. Art Therapy and Anger. Jessica Kingsley, London, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindsay, S., Jackson, D., Schofield, G., and Olivier, P. Engaging older people using participatory design. Proc. CHI '12, ACM (2012), 1199--1208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Liu, L.S., Huh, J., Neogi, T., Inkpen, K., and Pratt, W. Health vlogger-viewer interaction in chronic illness management. Proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 49--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Massimi, M. and Baecker, R.M. Dealing with death in design. Proc. CHI '11, ACM Press (2011), 1001--1010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Myers, D.G. The Pursuit of Happiness: Who is Happyand Why. William Morrow, New York, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. O'Donnell, G., Deaton, A., Durand, M., Halpern, D., and Layard, R. Wellbeing and policy. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Pykhtina, O., Balaam, M., Wood, G., Pattison, S., Kharrufa, A., and Olivier, P. Magic land: The design and evaluation of an interactive tabletop supporting therapeutic play with children. Proc. DIS '12, ACM Press (2012), 136--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ratto, M. Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life. The Information Society 27, 4 (2011), 252--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Reynolds, F. and Lim, K.H. Contribution of visual artmaking to the subjective well-being of women living with cancer: A qualitative study. The Arts in Psychotherapy 34, 1 (2007), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Riley, J., Corkhill, B., and Morris, C. The benefits of knitting for personal and social wellbeing in adulthood: Findings from an international survey. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy 76, 2 (2013), 50--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Rosner, D. and Bean, J. Learning from IKEA hacking. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI 09, ACM Press (2009), 419. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Rosner, D.K. Craft, computing & culture. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion CSCW '12, ACM Press (2012), 319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Rubin, J.A. Art Therapy. Taylor & Francis, New York, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55, 1 (2000), 68--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Ryff, C.D. and Singer, B.H. Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies 9, (2008), 13--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Sheldon, K.M., Reis, H.T., and Ryan, R.M. What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22, (1996), 1270--1279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Simonsen, J. and Robertson, T. International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge, New York, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Sweeney, P.D., Schaeffer, D.E., and Golin, S. Pleasant events, unpleasant events, and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43, (1982), 136--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Thieme, A., Balaam, M., Wallace, J., Coyle, D., and Lindley, S. Designing wellbeing. Proc. DIS '12, ACM (2012), 789--790. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Thieme, A., Wallace, J., Johnson, P., et al. Design to promote mindfulness practice and sense of self for vulnerable women in secure hospital services. Proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 2647--2656. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Vines, J., Clarke, R., Wright, P., McCarthy, J., and Olivier, P. Configuring participation: On how we involve people in design. Proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 429--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Wallace, J., Mccarthy, J., Wright, P.C., and Olivier, P. Making Design Probes Work. Proc. CHI '13, ACM Press (2013), 3441--3550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Wallace, J., Wright, P., McCarthy, J., Green, D., Thomas, J., and Olivier, P. A design-led inquiry into personhood in dementia. Proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 2617--2626. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Waller, D. Art therapy for children: How it leads to change. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 11, 2 (2006), 271--282.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Waterman, A.S. Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64, (1993), 678--691.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Waycott, J., Vetere, F., Pedell, S., et al. Older adults as digital content producers. Proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 39--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Wright, P. and McCarthy, J. Experience-centered Design: Designers, Users, and Communities in Dialogue. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, Milton Keynes, England, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Yoo, D., Huldtgren, A., Palzkill Woelfer, J., Hendry, D.G., and Friedman, B. A value sensitive actionreflection model: evolving a co-design space with stakeholder and designer prompts. Proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 419--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Yoo, D., Zimmerman, J., and Hirsch, T. Probing bus stop for insights on transit co-design. Proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 409--418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Making wellbeing: a process of user-centered design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems
      June 2014
      1102 pages
      ISBN:9781450329026
      DOI:10.1145/2598510

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 June 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate107of402submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader