Stephen E. Fancsali
ABSTRACT
Learners often think math is unrelated to their own interests. Instructional software has the potential to provide personalized instruction that responds to individuals' interests. Carnegie Learning's MATHia™ software for middle school mathematics asks learners to specify domains of their interest (e.g., sports & fitness, arts & music), as well as names of friends/classmates, and uses this information to both choose and personalize word problems for individual learners. Our analysis of MATHia's relatively coarse-grained personalization contrasts with more finegrained analysis in previous research on word problems in the Cognitive Tutor (e.g., finding effects on performance in parts of problems that depend on more difficult skills), and we explore associations of aggregate preference "honoring" with learner performance. To do so, we define a notion of "strong" learner interest area preferences and find that honoring such preferences has a small negative association with performance. However, learners that both merely express preferences (either interest area preferences or setting names of friends/classmates), and those that express strong preferences, tend to perform in ways that are associated with better learning compared to learners that do not express such preferences. We consider several explanations of these findings and suggest important topics for future research.
- Anand, P. G., and Ross, S. M. 1987. Using computer-assisted instruction to personalize arithmetic materials for elementary school children. J Educ Psychol 79, 1, 72--78.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Bernacki, M. L., Nokes-Malach, T. J., and Aleven, V. 2013. Fine-Grained Assessment of Motivation Over Long Periods of Learning with an Intelligent Tutoring System: Methodology, Advantages, and Preliminary Results. In International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer, Berlin, 629--644.Google Scholar
- Cordova, D. I., and Lepper, M. R. 1996. Intrinsic Motivation and the Process of Learning: Beneficial Effects of Contextualization, Personalization, and Choice. J Educ Psychol 88, 4, 715--730.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fancsali, S. E., Ritter, S., Stamper, J., and Nixon, N. 2013. Toward "Hyper-Personalized" Cognitive Tutors. In AIED 2013 Workshop Proc. Vol. 7: GIFT (Memphis, TN, July 13, 2013), 71--79.Google Scholar
- Ku, H., and Sullivan, H. J. 2002. Student performance and attitudes using personalized mathematics instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 50, 1, 21--34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pane, J. F., Griffin, B. A., McCaffrey, D. F., and Karam, R. 2013. Effectiveness of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I at Scale. RAND Education Working Paper: WR-984-DEIES.Google Scholar
- Ritter, S., Anderson, J. R., Koedinger, K. R., and Corbett, A. T. 2007. Cognitive Tutor: Applied Research in Mathematics Education. Psychon B Rev 14, 249--255.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ritter, S., Joshi, A., Fancsali, S. E., and Nixon, T. 2013. Predicting Standardized Test Scores from Cognitive Tutor Interactions. In Proc. of the 6th International Conf. on Educational Data Mining (Memphis, TN, July 6--9, 2013). 169--176.Google Scholar
- Ritter, S., Kulikowich, J., Lei, P., McGuire, C. L., and Morgan, P. 2007. What evidence matters? A randomized field trial of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I. In Supporting Learning Flow through Integrative Technologies: Volume 162 Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 13--20. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Virginia Department of Education. 2013. Standards of Learning (SOL) & Testing. Retrieved October 9, 2013. http://www.doe.virginia.gov/testing/Google Scholar
- Walkington, C. A. and Maull, K. 2011. Exploring the Assistance Dilemma: The Case of Context Personalization. In Proc. of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Boston, MA, July 20--23, 2011). 90--95.Google Scholar
- Walkington, C. A. and Sherman, M. 2012. Using Adaptive Learning Technologies to Personalize Instruction: The Impact of Interest-Based Scenarios on Performance in Algebra. In Proc. of the 10th International Conf. of the Learning Sciences (Sydney, July 2--6, 2012). 80--87.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Context personalization, preferences, and performance in an intelligent tutoring system for middle school mathematics
Recommendations
Personalized E-learning system with self-regulated learning assisted mechanisms for promoting learning performance
With the rapid development of Internet technologies, the conventional computer-assisted learning (CAL) is gradually moving toward to web-based learning. Additionally, instructors typically base their teaching methods to simultaneously interact with all ...
Context-Aware Personalization Using Neighborhood-Based Context Similarity
With the overwhelming volume of online multimedia content and increasing ubiquity of Internet-enabled mobile devices, pervasive use of the Web for content sharing and consumption has become our everyday routines. Consequently, people seeking online ...
Improving Similarity Measurement of User's Rating Value using Sigmoid Function in Personalization System
IMCOM '16: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and CommunicationPersonalization system is a method of providing appropriate products on the users' preferences and requirements. Collaborative Filtering is the most popular technique in an effective, Personalized Recommendation System to find a specific user with ...
Comments