skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557224acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Traffigram: distortion for clarification via isochronal cartography

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most geographic maps visually represent physical distance; however, travel time can in some cases be more important than distance because it directly indicates availability. The technique of creating maps from temporal data is known as isochronal cartography, and is a form of distortion for clarification. In an isochronal map, congestion expands areas, while ideal travel conditions make the map shrink in comparison to the actual distance scale of a traditional map. Although there have been many applications of this technique, detailed user studies of its efficacy remain scarce, and there are conflicting views on its practical value. To attempt to settle this issue, we utilized a user-centered design process to determine which features of isochronal cartography might be most usable in practice. We developed an interactive cartographic visualization system, Traffigram, that features a novel combination of efficient isochronal map algorithms and an interface designed to give map users a quick and seamless experience while preserving geospatial integrity and aesthetics. We validated our design choices with multiple usability studies. We present our results and discuss implications for design.

References

  1. Agrawala M., Li W. Berthouzoz, F. 2011. Design principles for visual communication. Communications of the ACM, 54(4), 60--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bies S., Van Kreveld M. 2013. Time-Space Maps from Triangulations. In Proc. International Symposium on Graph Drawing 2013, LNCS 7704, 511--516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chen X. 2011. Seeing Differently -- Cartography for Subjective Maps Based on Dynamic Urban Data. MIT SMArchS Thesis, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dijkstra E.W. 1959. A Note on Two Problems in Connection with Graphs. Numerische Mathematik 1:269--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dorling D., Barford A., Newman M. 2006. Worldmapper: The world as you've never seen it before. IEEE TVCG 12(5), 757--764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jenny B. 2012. Adaptive Composite Map Projection. IEEE TVCG 18(12), 2575--2582.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaiser C., Walsh F., Farmer C. J. Q., Pozdnoukhov A. 2010. User-Centric Time-Distance Representation of Road Networks. In Proc. GIScience 2010, LNCS 6292, 85--99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Karlin O. 2005. Time Travel. http://oskarlin.com/2005/11/29/time-travelGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kimerling A.J., Buckley A.R., Muehrcke P.C., Muehrcke J.O. 2011. Map Use: Reading, Analysis, Interpretation. Esri Press, California Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kopf J., Agrawala M., Salesin D., Bargeron D., Cohen M. F. 2010. Automatic Generation of Destination Maps. In Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia 2010, 158:1--158:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kraak M.-J., Ormeling F. 2003. Cartography: Visualization of Geospatial Data. Longman, UKGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Kramer J. 2007. Is Abstraction the Key to Computing? Communications of the ACM, 50(4), 36--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lightfoot C., Steinberg T. 2006. Travel-time Maps and their Uses. http://www.mysociety.org/2006/travel-timemaps.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mackinlay J. 1986. Automating the Design of Graphical Presentations of Relational Information. ACM TOG 5.2. 110--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Newman M. 2012. Maps of the 2012 US presidential election results. http://wwwpersonal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nielsen, J. 1993. Usability Engineering. AP Professional, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Shimizu E. 1992. Time-space Mapping Based on Topological Transformation of Physical Map. In Proc. of WCTR 6th. 219--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Shimizu E., Inoue R. 2003. A Generalized Solution of Time-space Mapping. In Proc. CUPUM 2003 (CDROM). Vol 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Shimizu E., Inoue R. 2009. A New Algorithm for Distance Cartogram Construction. International Journal of GIS 23.11(2009): 1453--1470Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Carden T., London Tube map. http://www.tomcarden.co.uk/p5/tube_map_travel_times/appletGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ullah R., Kraak M.-J., Van Elzakker, C. 2013. Using cartograms to explore temporal data: Do they work? http://www.geomatikhamburg.de/geoviz/online/Ullah_slides.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. VanBuskirk, J., Harper, J. S. 2012. Traffic Lighting: The Next Generation. In Proc. SAS Global forum, 282--2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Wahba, G. 1990. Spline Models for Observational Data. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Traffigram: distortion for clarification via isochronal cartography

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader