skip to main content
research-article

Optimal common-centroid-based unit capacitor placements for yield enhancement of switched-capacitor circuits

Published:20 December 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Yield is defined as the probability that the circuit under consideration meets with the design specification within the tolerance. Placement with higher correlation coefficients has fewer mismatches and lower variation of capacitor ratio, thus achieving higher yield performance. This study presents a new optimization criterion that quickly determines if the placement is optimal. The optimization criterion leads to the development of the concepts of C-entries and partitioned subarrays which can significantly reduce the searching space for finding the optimal/near-optimal placements on a sufficiently large array size.

References

  1. Chen, J.-E., Luo, P.-W., and Wey, C. L. 2009. Yield evaluation of analog placement with arbitrary capacitor ratio. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Quality of Electronic Design, 179--184. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISQED.2009.4810290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chen, J.-E., Luo, P.-W., and Wey, C. L. 2010. Placement optimization for yield improvement of switched-capacitor analog integrated circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aid. Des. Integr. Circ. Syst. 29, 2, 313--318. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2009.2035587. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Doh, J. S., Kim, D. W., Lee, S. H., Lee, J. B., Park, Y. K., Yoo, M. H., and Kong, J. T. 2005. A unified statistical model for inter-die and intra-die process variation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices. 131--134. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SISPAD.2005.201490.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hastings, A. 2000. The Art of Analog Layout. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang, C.-C., Chen, J.-E., Luo, P.-W., and Wey, C. L. 2011. Yield-aware placement optimization for switched-capacitor analog integrated circuits. In Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International SOC Conference. 170--173. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SOCC.2011.6085127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang, C.-C. To appear. Common-centroid-based unit capacitor placement generation for switched-capacitor integrated circuits, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Khalil, D. and Dessouky, M. 2002. Automatic generation of common-centroid capacitor arrays with arbitrary capacitor ratio. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe. 576--580. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Khalil, D., Dessouky, M., Bourguet, V., Louerat, M. M., Catheline, A., and Ragai, H. 2005. Evaluation of capacitor ratios in automated accurate common centroid capacitor arrays. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Quality of Electronic Design. 143--147. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISQED.2005.54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lin, C.-W., Lin, J.-M., Chiu, Y.-C., Huang, C.-P., and Chang, S.-J. 2011. Common-centroid capacitor placement considering systematic and random mismatches in analog integrated circuits. In Proceedings of the 48rd Annual Design Automation Conference. 528--533. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Liu, J., Dong, S., Hong, X., Wang, Y., He, O., and Goto, S. 2008. Symmetry constraint based on mismatch analysis for analog layout in SOI technology. In Proceedings of the Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference. 772--775. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ASPDAC.2008.4484055. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Luo, P.-W., Chen, J.-E., Huang, M.-Y., and Wey, C. L. 2011. Design methodology for yield enhancement of switched-capacitor analog integrated circuits. IEICE Trans. Fund. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci. E94-A, 1, 352--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Luo, P.-W., Chen, J.-E., Wey, C. L., Cheng, L.-C., Chen, J.-J., and Wu, W.-C. 2008. Impact of capacitance correlation on yield enhancement of mixed-signal/analog integrated circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aid. Des. Integr. Circ. Syst. 27, 11, 2097--2101. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2008.2006139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ma, Q., Young, E. F. Y., and Pun, K. P. 2007. Analog placement with common centroid constraints. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Design. 579--585. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCAD.2007.4397327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mcnutt, M. J., Lemarquis, S., and Dunkley, J. L. 1994. Systematic capacitance matching errors and corrective layout procedures. IEEE J. Solid-State Circ. 29, 5, 611--616. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/4.284714.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Xiong, J., Zolotov, V., and Lei, H. 2007. Robust extraction of spatial correlation. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aid. Des. Integr. Circ. Syst. 26, 4, 619--631. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2006.884403. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Optimal common-centroid-based unit capacitor placements for yield enhancement of switched-capacitor circuits

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems
        ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems  Volume 19, Issue 1
        December 2013
        210 pages
        ISSN:1084-4309
        EISSN:1557-7309
        DOI:10.1145/2558148
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 December 2013
        • Accepted: 1 July 2013
        • Revised: 1 May 2013
        • Received: 1 October 2012
        Published in todaes Volume 19, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader