skip to main content
10.1145/2505469.2505475acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bit error distribution and mutation patterns of corrupted packets in low-power wireless networks

Published:30 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

It is well known that wireless channels produce higher bit error rates than wired connections. However, little knowledge exists about how bit errors are distributed within messages. In this paper, we present results from our experiments in an 802.15.4 sensor node testbed investigating the distribution of errors within erroneous frames. We identify three effects that can only partially be explained by coding and channel conditions: (1) errors are not independently distributed, but to a certain extent bursty, (2) coding leads to some bits being more stable than others, and (3) some content is inherently more stable than other during transmission. We discuss hypotheses on the origins of these effects and give some preliminary ideas on how to leverage them.

References

  1. C. A. Boano, J. Brown, N. Tsiftes, U. Roedig, and T. Voigt, "The impact of temperature on outdoor industrial sensornet applications," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 451--459, aug 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. C. A. Boano, T. Voigt, C. Noda, K. Romer, and M. A. Zuniga, "JamLab: Augmenting sensornet testbeds with realistic and controlled interference generation," in Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, ser. IPSN'11, apr 2011, pp. 175--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chipcon Tech., "CC2420 Datasheet," focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/cc2420.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. Han, L. Ji, S. Lee, B. Bhattacharjee, and R. Miller, "All Bits Are Not Equal -- A Study of IEEE 802.11 Communication Bit Errors," in Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, ser. INFOCOM '09. IEEE, Apr. 2009, pp. 1602--1610.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. F. Hermans, O. Rensfelt, T. Voigt, E. Ngai, L.-A. Norden, and P. Gunningberg, "SoNIC: classifying interference in 802.15.4 sensor networks," in Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks, ser. IPSN '13. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2013, pp. 55--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, D. Culler, and K. Pister, "System architecture directions for networked sensors," in Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, ser. ASPLOS IX. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2000, pp. 93--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs), IEEE Std. 802.15.4, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specification, IEEE Std. 802.11, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C.-J. M. Liang, N. B. Priyantha, J. Liu, and A. Terzis, "Surviving wi-fi interference in low power zigbee networks," in Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, ser. SenSys '10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 309--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. Mottola, G. P. Picco, M. Ceriotti, S. Guna, and A. L. Murphy, "Not all wireless sensor networks are created equal: A comparative study on tunnels," ACM Trans. Sen. Netw., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 15:1--15:33, Sep. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, and D. Culler, "Telos: enabling ultra-low power wireless research," in Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks, ser. IPSN '05. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Singh and D. Pesch, "Towards energy efficient adaptive error control in indoor wsn: A fuzzy logic based approach," in Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems,ser. MASS '11. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2011, pp. 63--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. Srinivasan, P. Dutta, A. Tavakoli, and P. Levis, "An empirical study of low-power wireless," ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 16:1--16:49, Mar. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. TinyOS, "TEP 111: message t," http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.1.0/doc/html/tep111.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Willig, M. Kubisch, C. Hoene, and A. Wolisz, "Measurements of a wireless link in an industrial environment using an IEEE 802.11-compliant physical layer," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1265--1282, Dec. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Zuniga and B. Krishnamachari, "An analysis of unreliability and asymmetry in low-power wireless links," ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, vol. 3, no. 2, Jun. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bit error distribution and mutation patterns of corrupted packets in low-power wireless networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WiNTECH '13: Proceedings of the 8th ACM international workshop on Wireless network testbeds, experimental evaluation & characterization
        September 2013
        114 pages
        ISBN:9781450323642
        DOI:10.1145/2505469

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 September 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WiNTECH '13 Paper Acceptance Rate11of26submissions,42%Overall Acceptance Rate63of100submissions,63%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader