ABSTRACT
Barcamps are informal conferences whose content is not defined in advance, often referred to as ad-hoc conferences or un-conferences. Therefore, the outcomes of a barcamp are largely unknown before the event. This raises the question of the participants' motivations to attend and contribute. To answer this question, we conducted an exploratory empirical study at Barcamp Graz 2012. We applied a mixed-method approach: first we used a socio-demographic questionnaire (n=99) which allowed us to characterize the 'typical barcamper'. Second, we conducted qualitative interviews (n=10) to get a deeper understanding of the participants' motivations to attend, expectations, and the use of social media in that context. We identified three concepts, which could be deducted from the interviews: people, format and topics. We found that the motivation to attend and even a common identity is quite strongly based on these three factors. Furthermore, the results indicate that participants share a set of activities and methods by following the barcamp's inherent rules and make extensive use of social media.
- T. Bernhardt and M. Kirchner. Web 2.0 meets conference: The educamp as a new format of participation and exchange in the world of education. In Looking Toward the Future of Technology-Enhanced Education, pages 192--204. Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Boule. Mob Rule Learning: Camps, Unconferences, and Trashing the Talking Head. Cyber Age Books, Medfor, Oct. 2011.Google Scholar
- B. Chen. Is the backchannel enabled? Using twitter at academic conferences. In Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2011.Google Scholar
- M. Ebner and W. Reinhardt. Social networking in scientific conferences: Twitter as tool for strengthen a scientific community. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Science, 2(C):1--8, 2009.Google Scholar
- D. Ernesto and L. Fonseca. EduCamp Colombia : Social Networked Learning for Teacher Training. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 2011.Google Scholar
- P. Kraker, C. Wagner, F. Jeanquartier, and S. Lindstaedt. On the Way to a Science Intelligence: Visualizing TEL Tweets for Trend Detection. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, pages 220--232. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. R. Lakhani and R. G. Wolf. Why Hackers Do What They Do : Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free / Open Source Software Projects. In Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, pages 1--27. MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
- L. Lapointe. BarCampOrlando 2009: a model for libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 26(5/6):1--3, 2009.Google Scholar
- J. Lave and E. Wenger. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, volume 95 of Learning in doing. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
- S. Lawson. Library Camps and Unconferences. Neal-Schuman Publishers, New York, 2010.Google Scholar
- A. Louie, N. Asis, and T. Chapters. Designing a User-Centered Conference for User-Centered Information Professionals : The Story of InfoCamp Seattle. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 34(5):5--9, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Mayring. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 2000.Google Scholar
- K. Weller, E. Drge, and C. Puschmann. Citation analysis in twitter. approaches for defining and measuring information flows within tweets during scientific conferences. In Proceedings of Making Sense of Microposts Workshop at ESWC, 2011.Google Scholar
- M. Weller. The Digital Scholar. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, Sept. 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Wenger, R. McDermott, and W. Snyder. Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge, volume 5 of Learning in doing. Harvard Business School Press, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Wenger, N. White, and J. D. Smith. Digital Habitats; Stewarding Technology for Communities. CPsquare, 2009.Google Scholar
- Y. Ye and K. Kishida. Toward an Understanding of the Motivation of Open Source Software Developers. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 419--429, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
Assessing Barcamps: Incentives for Participation in Ad-hoc Conferences and the Role of Social Media
Recommendations
How Do People Participate in Social Network Sites After Crises? A Self-Determination Perspective
People increasingly rely on social network sites (SNSs) to find out timely information about crises. Thus, emergency managers are interested in how people participate and how to promote their participation in SNSs after crises. Based on self-...
Motivations and habits of micro-news consumption on mobile social media
Highlights- Micro-news on social media are short summaries of news content.
- Survey of U.S. ...
AbstractMicro-news are abbreviated summaries or teasers of news content that are often accompanied with links to longer articles. We investigated motivations and habits of micro-news consumption through mobile social media platforms and how ...
How do B2B companies motivate participation in online innovation?
MindTrek '12: Proceeding of the 16th International Academic MindTrek ConferenceThe aim of this paper is to explore what kinds of factors are used by business-to-business (B2B) companies in order to motivate their B2B customers to participate in innovation processes utilizing social media. This qualitative multiple case study is a ...
Comments