skip to main content
research-article

DutyCon: A dynamic duty-cycle control approach to end-to-end delay guarantees in wireless sensor networks

Published:23 July 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

It is well known that periodically putting nodes into sleep can effectively save energy in wireless sensor networks at the cost of increased communication delays. However, most existing work mainly focuses on the static sleep scheduling, which cannot guarantee the desired delay when the network conditions change dynamically. In many applications with user-specified end-to-end delay requirements, the duty cycle of every node should be tuned individually at runtime based on the network conditions to achieve the desired end-to-end delay guarantees and energy efficiency. In this article, we propose DutyCon, a control theory-based dynamic duty-cycle control approach. DutyCon decomposes the end-to-end delay guarantee problem into a set of single-hop delay guarantee problems along each data flow in the network. We then formulate the single-hop delay guarantee problem as a dynamic feedback control problem and design the controller rigorously, based on feedback control theory, for analytic assurance of control accuracy and system stability. DutyCon also features a queuing delay adaptation scheme that adapts the duty cycle of each node to unpredictable incoming packet rates, as well as a novel energy-balancing approach that extends the network lifetime by dynamically adjusting the delay requirement allocated to each hop. Our empirical results on a hardware testbed demonstrate that DutyCon can effectively achieve the desired trade-off between end-to-end delay and energy conservation. Extensive simulation results also show that DutyCon outperforms two baseline sleep scheduling protocols by having more energy savings while meeting the end-to-end delay requirements.

References

  1. Abdelzaher, T. F., Stankovic, J. A., Lu, C., Zhang, R., and Lu, Y. 2003. Feedback performance control in software services. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 23, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Buettner, M., Yee, G. V., Anderson, E., and Han, R. 2006. X-MAC: A short preamble mac protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Caccamo, M., Zhang, L. Y., and Sha, L. 2002. An implicit prioritized access protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cerpa, A., Wong, J. L., Potkonjak, M., and Estrin, D. 2005. Temporal properties of low power wireless links: Modeling and implications on multi-hop routing. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chipara, O., Lu, C., and Roman, G.-C. 2005. Efficient power management based on application timing semantics for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Franklin, G. F., Workman, M. L., and Powell, D. 1997. Digital Control of Dynamic Systems. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gnawali, O., Fonseca, R., Jamieson, K., Moss, D., and Levis, P. 2009. Collection tree protocol. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gu, Y., He, T., Lin, M., and Xu, J. 2009. Spatiotemporal delay control for low-duty-cycle sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 30th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ha, R. W., Ho, P.-H., and Shen, X. S. 2006. Cross-layer application-specific wireless sensor network design with single-channel csma mac over sense-sleep trees. Comput. Commun. 29, 3425--3444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. He, T., Stankovic, J., Lu, C., and Abdelzaher, T. 2003. SPEED: A stateless protocol for real-time communication in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. He, T., Vicaire, P., Yan, T., Cao, Q., Zhou, G., Gu, L., Luo, L., Stoleru, R., Stankovic, J. A., and Abdelzaher, T. F. 2006. Achieving long-term surveillance in vigilnet. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Karenos, K. and Kalogeraki, V. 2006. Real-time traffic management in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 27th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Le, H. K., Henriksson, D., and Abdelzaher, T. 2007. A control theory approach to throughput optimization in multi-channel collection sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lin, S., Zhang, J., Zhou, G., Gu, L., Stankovic, J. A., and He, T. 2006. ATPC: Adaptive transmission power control for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lu, C., Blum, B. M., Abdelzaher, T. F., Stankovic, J. A., and He, T. 2002. RAP: A real-time communication architecture for large-scale wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lu, G., Krishnamachari, B., and Raghavendra, C. S. 2004. An adaptive energy-efficient and low-latency mac for data gathering in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 18th International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Maimour, M. 2008. Maximally radio-disjoint multipath routing for wireless multimedia sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Workshop on Wireless Multimedia Networking and Performance Modeling. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Merlin, C. and Heinzelman, W. 2008. Duty cycle control for low-power-listening mac protocols. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Merlin, C. and Heinzelman, W. 2010a. Duty cycle control for low-power-listening mac protocols. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 9, 11 (Nov.), 1508--1521. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Merlin, C. and Heinzelman, W. 2010b. Schedule adaptation of low-power-listening protocols for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 9, 5 (May), 672--685. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Min, Y., Yang, L. T., Wang, F., and Wang, W. 2008. Dynamic sleeping algorithm based on AHP for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Future Generation Communication and Networking. Vol. 2. IEEE Computer Society, 387--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ning, X. and Cassandras, C. 2008. Optimal dynamic sleep time control in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Polastre, J., Hill, J., and Culler, D. 2004. Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., and Culler, D. 2005. Telos: Enabling ultra-low power wireless research. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Rajendran, V., Obraczka, K., and Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J. J. 2003. Energy-efficient collision-free medium access control for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rhee, I., Warrier, A., Min, J., and Xu., L. 2006. DRAND: Distributed randomized tdma scheduling for wireless ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Tang, L., Sun, Y., Gurewitz, O., and Johnson, D. 2011. PW-MAC: An energy-efficient predictive-wakeup mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 30th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. van Dam, T. and Langendoen, K. 2003a. An adaptive energy-efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. van Dam, T. and Langendoen, K. 2003b. An adaptive energy-efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Wang, X., Wang, X., Xing, F., Xing, G., and Jha, N. 2009. Flow-based real-time communication in multi-channel wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wang, X., Wang, X., Xing, G., and Yao, Y. 2010. Dynamic duty cycle control for end-to-end delay guarantees in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Quality of Service.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Woo, A., Tong, T., and Culler, D. 2003. Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Ye, W., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2002. An energy-efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhao, J. and Govindan, R. 2003. Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. DutyCon: A dynamic duty-cycle control approach to end-to-end delay guarantees in wireless sensor networks

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
              ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 9, Issue 4
              July 2013
              523 pages
              ISSN:1550-4859
              EISSN:1550-4867
              DOI:10.1145/2489253
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 2013 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 23 July 2013
              • Accepted: 1 August 2012
              • Revised: 1 June 2012
              • Received: 1 December 2011
              Published in tosn Volume 9, Issue 4

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader