skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2470760acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving touch accuracy on large tabletops using predecessor and successor

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Touch interfaces provide great flexibility in designing an UI. However, the actual experience is often frustrating due to bad touch recognition. On small systems, we can analyze yaw, roll, and pitch of the finger to increase touch accuracy for a single touch. On larger systems, we need to take additional factors into account as users have more flexibility for their limb posture and need to aim over larger distances. Thus, we investigated how people perform touch sequences on those large touch surfaces. We show that the relative location of the predecessor of a touch has a significant impact on the orientation and position of the touch ellipsis.

We exploited this effect on an off-the-shelf touch display and showed that with only minimal preparation the touch accuracy of standard hardware can be improved by at least 7%, allowing better recognition rates or more UI components on the same screen.

References

  1. P. Albinsson and S. Zhai. High precision touch screen interaction. Proc. CHI '03, 105--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. Baudisch. Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. Proc. CHI '09, 1923--1932. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. M. Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6):381--391, 1954.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. C. Harrison, J. Schwarz, and S. E. Hudson. TapSense: enhancing finger interaction on touch surfaces. Proc. UIST '11, 627--634, October. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Holz and P. Baudisch. The generalized perceived input point model and how to double touch accuracy by extracting fingerprints. Proc. CHI '10, 581--590. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. Marquardt, J. Kiemer, D. Ledo, S. Boring, and S. Greenberg. Designing user-, hand-, and handpart-aware tabletop interactions with the TouchID toolkit. Proc. ITS '11, 21--30, November. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. A. Rosenbaum, F. Marchak, H. J. Barnes, J. Vaughan, J. D. Slotta, and M. J. Jorgensen. Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Vogel and P. Baudisch. Shift: a technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. Proc. CHI '07, 657--666, April. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. F. Wang and X. Ren. Empirical Evaluation for Finger Input Properties In Multi-touch Interaction. Proc. CHI '09, 1063--1072. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improving touch accuracy on large tabletops using predecessor and successor

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader