ABSTRACT
Touch interfaces provide great flexibility in designing an UI. However, the actual experience is often frustrating due to bad touch recognition. On small systems, we can analyze yaw, roll, and pitch of the finger to increase touch accuracy for a single touch. On larger systems, we need to take additional factors into account as users have more flexibility for their limb posture and need to aim over larger distances. Thus, we investigated how people perform touch sequences on those large touch surfaces. We show that the relative location of the predecessor of a touch has a significant impact on the orientation and position of the touch ellipsis.
We exploited this effect on an off-the-shelf touch display and showed that with only minimal preparation the touch accuracy of standard hardware can be improved by at least 7%, allowing better recognition rates or more UI components on the same screen.
- P. Albinsson and S. Zhai. High precision touch screen interaction. Proc. CHI '03, 105--112. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Baudisch. Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. Proc. CHI '09, 1923--1932. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. M. Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6):381--391, 1954.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Harrison, J. Schwarz, and S. E. Hudson. TapSense: enhancing finger interaction on touch surfaces. Proc. UIST '11, 627--634, October. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Holz and P. Baudisch. The generalized perceived input point model and how to double touch accuracy by extracting fingerprints. Proc. CHI '10, 581--590. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Marquardt, J. Kiemer, D. Ledo, S. Boring, and S. Greenberg. Designing user-, hand-, and handpart-aware tabletop interactions with the TouchID toolkit. Proc. ITS '11, 21--30, November. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. A. Rosenbaum, F. Marchak, H. J. Barnes, J. Vaughan, J. D. Slotta, and M. J. Jorgensen. Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1990.Google Scholar
- D. Vogel and P. Baudisch. Shift: a technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. Proc. CHI '07, 657--666, April. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Wang and X. Ren. Empirical Evaluation for Finger Input Properties In Multi-touch Interaction. Proc. CHI '09, 1063--1072. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Improving touch accuracy on large tabletops using predecessor and successor
Recommendations
Tangible 3D tabletops: combining tangible tabletop interaction and 3D projection
NordiCHI '12: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through DesignIn this paper we present the tangible 3D tabletop and discuss the design potential of this novel interface. The tangible 3D tabletop combines tangible tabletop interaction with 3D projection in such a way that the tangible objects may be augmented with ...
Towards document engineering on pen and touch-operated interactive tabletops
UIST Adjunct Proceedings '12: Adjunct proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technologyTouch interfaces have now become mainstream thanks to modern smartphones and tablets. However, there are still very few "productivity" applications, i.e. tools that support mundane but essential work, especially for large interactive surfaces such as ...
Pen + touch = new tools
UIST '10: Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technologyWe describe techniques for direct pen+touch input. We observe people's manual behaviors with physical paper and notebooks. These serve as the foundation for a prototype Microsoft Surface application, centered on note-taking and scrapbooking of ...
Comments