skip to main content
10.1145/2463728.2463793acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Public CIO, figurehead or decision-maker?: the case of Germany

Published:22 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we analyze the position of CIO in the German states. In Germany, public CIOs range from figureheads to real decision-makers. We identified three CIO types: first, the Political CIO, who has substantial resources but less IT competencies; second, the Operational CIO, who manages IT primarily close to actual projects; third, the Decorative CIO, who serves predominantly for public image. Thus, the institution of CIO moves between catchphrase and e-government enabler.

References

  1. Krcmar, H.: Informationsmanagement, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Heine, M.: Transfer von E-Government-Lösungen, Gito, Berlin, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. OECD: OECD E-Government Studies. e-Government for better Government. OECD Publishing, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mehlich, H.: Electronic Government. Die elektronische Verwaltungsreform, Gabler, Wiesbaden, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eynon, R. and Margetts, H.: Organisational Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to eGovernment. European Journal of ePractice 1 (November 2007), 73--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. OECD: Bessere Rechtsetzung in Europa. Deutschland. OECD Publishing, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jupp, V.: Realizing the Vision of eGovernment, Journal of Political Marketing, 2:3-4, 128--145, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Borins, S.: A Holistic View of Public Sector Information Technology, Journal of E-Government, 1:2, 3--29, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Synnot, W. R.: The Information Weapon: Winning Customers and Markets with Technology. John Wiley & Sons, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Abele, J.: Methoden für Strategie und Organisation. In: Zechner, A. (ed.): Handbuch E-Government, Deutschland Online and Fraunhofer eGovernment Zentrum, 197--211, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Declan O'Riordan, P.: The CIO: MIS Makes Its Move into the Executive Suite, Journal of Information Systems Management, 4:3, 54--56, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Buhl, H. U.; Kreyer, N. and Wolfersberger, P.: Die Rolle des Chief Information Officer (CIO) im Management. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 43(4), 408, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyle, R. D. and Burbridge, J. J.: Who needs a CIO? Information Strategy. The Executive's Journal, 7:12--18, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. McClure, C. R. and Bertot, J. C.: The chief information officer (CIO): assessing its impact, Government Information Quartely, 17:1, 7--12, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Reichard, C.: Zur Naivität aktueller Konzepttransfers im deutschen Public Management, in: Edeling, T., Jann, W. and Wagner, D. (eds.): Öffentliches und privates Management. Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects?, Leske + Budrich, Opladen, 53--70, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W.: The iron Cage Revisited. Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Field, in: Powell, W. W. and DiMaggio, P. J., (eds.): The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B.: Instituationalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. In: American Journal for Sociology 83, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Killian, W. and Wind, M.: Verwaltung und Vernetzung. Technische Integration bei organisatorischer Vielfalt am Beispiel von Agrar- und Umweltverwaltungen, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pollitt, C.: Technological Change: A Central yet Neglected Feature of Public Administration. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, III (2), 31--53, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Public CIO, figurehead or decision-maker?: the case of Germany

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEGOV '12: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
      October 2012
      547 pages
      ISBN:9781450312004
      DOI:10.1145/2463728

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ICEGOV '12 Paper Acceptance Rate23of98submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader