Marc Hassenzahl
Stephanie Heidecker
Skip Abstract Section
Skip Supplemental Material SectionAbstract
A wealth of evidence suggests that love, closeness, and intimacy---in short relatedness---are important for people’s psychological well-being. Nowadays, however, couples are often forced to live apart. Accordingly, there has been a growing and flourishing interest in designing technologies that mediate (and create) a feeling of relatedness when being separated, beyond the explicit verbal communication and simple emoticons available technologies offer. This article provides a review of 143 published artifacts (i.e., design concepts, technologies). Based on this, we present six strategies used by designers/researchers to create a relatedness experience: Awareness, expressivity, physicalness, gift giving, joint action, and memories. We understand those strategies as starting points for the experience-oriented design of technology.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
pdf
a30-hassenzahl_appendix.pdf (16.1 MB)
The proof is given in an electronic appendix, available online in the ACM Digital Library.
- Ames, M. G., Go, J., Kaye, J., and Spasojevic, M. 2010. Making love in the network closet: The benefits and work of family videochat. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, New York, NY, 145--154. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Argyle, M. 1987. The Psychology of Happiness. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
- Baharin, H., Nor, R., and Mühlberger, R. 2008. It’s the thought that counts: Content vs. contact. In Proceedings of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. ACM, New York, NY, 235--238. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, J. 2011. Interaction criticism: An Introduction to the practice. Interact. Comput. 23, 604--621. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Belk, R. W. 1976. It’s the thought that counts: A signed diagraph analysis of giftgiving. J. Consumer Resear. 3, 155--162.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Belk, R. W. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. J. Consumer Resear. 152, 139--168.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Belk, R. W. and Coon, G. S. 1993. Gift giving as Agapic Love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. J. Consumer Resear. 203, 393--417.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Berscheid, E. and Peplau, L. A. 1983. The emerging science of relationships. In Close Relationships, H. H. Kelley, et al. Eds., W. H. Freeman, New York, NY, 1--19.Google Scholar
- Berzowska, J. and Coelho, M. 2006. SMOKS: The memory suits. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 538--543. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bhandari, S. and Bardzell, S. 2008. Bridging gaps: Affective communication in long distance relationships. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 2763--2768. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blondis, M. N. and Jackson, B. E. 1982. Nonverbal Communication with Parents: Back to the Human Touch 2nd Ed., John Wiley Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Brehm, S. S. 1992. Intimate Relationships 2nd Ed. Random House, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., and Rodgers, W. 1976. The Quality of American Life. Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Chang, A., O’Modhrain, S., Jacob, R., Gunther, E., and Ishii, H. 2002. ComTouch: Design of a vibrotactile communication device. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 312--320. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cheal, D. 1987. Showing them you love them: Gift giving and the dialectic of intimacy. Sociological Rev. 35, 151--169.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chung, H., Lee, C. H. J., and Selker, T. 2006. Lover’s cups: Drinking interfaces as new communication channels. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 375--380. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark, M. S., Fitness, J., and Brissette, I. 2001. Understanding people’s perceptions of relationships is crucial to understanding their emotional lives. In Handbook of Social Psychology. Vol 2: Interpersonal Processes, G. Fletcher and M. S. Clark Eds., Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 253--278.Google Scholar
- Dey, A. K. and De Guzman, E. S. 2006. From awareness to connectedness: The design and deployment of presence displays. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 899--908. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dunne, A. and Raby, F. 1994. Fields and thresholds. In Proceedings of the Doors of Perception Conference. http://www.mediamatic.nl/Doors/Doors2/DunRab/DunRab-Doors2-E.html.Google Scholar
- Epstein, S. 1990. Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, L. A. Pervin Ed., Guilford Press, New York, NY, 165--192.Google Scholar
- Evjemo, B., Svendsen, G. B., Rinde, E., and Johnsen, J. 2004. Supporting the distributed family: The need for a conversational context. In Proceedings of the Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 309--312. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Feltham, F. Vetere, F., and Wensveen, S. 2007. Designing tangible artifacts for playful interactions and dialogues. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 61--75. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Field, T. 2001. Touch. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Fitness, J. 2001. Emotional intelligence and intimate relationships. In Emotional Intelligence in Everyday Life: A Scientific Enquiry, J. Ciarrochi, J. P. Forgas, and J. D. Mayer Eds., Edwards Brothers, Lillington, NC, 98--112.Google Scholar
- Fletcher, G. J. O., Fincham, F., Cramer, L., and Heron, N. 1987. The role of attributions in close relationships. J. Personality Social Psych. 53, 481--489.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Freedman, J. 1978. Happy People: What Happiness Is, Who Has It, and Why. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Garnæs, K., Grünberger, O., Kjeldskov, J., and Skov, M. B. 2007. Designing technologies for presence-in-absence: Illustrating the cube and the picture frame. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 115, 403--408. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gaver, W. W. and Martin, H. 2000. Alternatives. Exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing. ACM, New York, 209--216. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 233--240. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gibbs, M. A., Vetere, F., Bunyan, M., and Howard, S. 2005. SynchroMate: A phatic technology for mediating intimacy. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing for User eXperience. AIGA, New York, NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Greenberg, S. and Buxton, B. 2008. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 111--120. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guldner, G. T. 1996. Long-distance romantic relationships: Prevalence and separation-related symptoms in college students. J. College Student 37, 289--295.Google Scholar
- Guldner, G. T. 2003. Long Distance Relationships: The Complete Guide. JF Milne Publications, Corona, CA.Google Scholar
- Haans, A., de Nood, C., and Ijsselsteijn, W. A. 2007. Investigating response similarities between real and mediated social touch: A first test. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 2405--1410. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hassenzahl, M. 2010. Experience Design. Technology for All the Right Reasons. Synthesis Lectures on Human Computer Interaction, Morgan and Claypool Publishers, San Francisco, CA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hassenzahl, M. 2011. User experience and experience design. http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/user_experience_and_experience_design.html.Google Scholar
- Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., and Göritz, A. 2010. Needs, affect, and interactive products -- Facets of user experience. Interact. Comput. 225, 353--362. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hayashi, T., Agamanolis, S., and Karau, M. 2008. Mutsugoto: A body-drawing communicator for distant partners. In ACM SIGGRAPH Posters. ACM, New York, NY, Article 91. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huang, M.-H. and Yu, S. 2000. Duration models to analyze dating relationships: The controversial role of gift giving. Family Consumer Sci. Resear. J. 28, 411--427.Google Scholar
- Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. 1997. Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 234--241. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jordan, P. 2000. Designing Pleasurable Products. An Introduction to the New Human Factors. Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
- Kaye, J. 2006. I just clicked to say I love you: Rich evaluations of minimal communication. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 363--368. Google ScholarDigital Library
- King, S. J. and Forlizzi, J. 2007. Slow messaging: Intimate communication for couples living at a distance. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. ACM, New York, NY, 451--454. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kjeldskov, J., Gibbs, M., Vetere, F., Howard, S., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K., and Bunyan, M. 2004. Using cultural probes to explore mediated intimacy. Australas. J. Inf. Syst. 112, 102--115.Google Scholar
- Knobel, M., Hassenzahl, M., Lamara, M., Sattler, T., Schumann, J., Eckoldt, K., and Butz, A. 2012. Clique trip: Feeling related in different cars. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 29--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li, M. and Jianting, H. 2009. Ambient environments for emotional physical communication. In Proceedings of the International Conference NZ Chapter of ACM’s Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 81--84. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lindley, S. E., Harper, R., and Sellen, A. 2009. Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape: Attitudes of older adults. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1693--1702. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lottridge, D., Masson, N., and Mackay, W. 2009. Sharing empty moments: Design for remote couples. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 2329--2338. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Magnuson, S. and Norem, K. 1999. Challenges of higher-education couples in commuter marriages: Insights for couples and counsellors who work with them. Family J. 7, 125--135.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maslow, A. H. 1954. Motivation and Personality. Harper, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. 2004. Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mick, D. G. and Demoss, M. 1990. Self-gifts: Phenomenological insights from four contexts. J. Consumer Resear. 17, 322--332.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miesen, H. W. J. M. and Schaafsma, J. 2008. Get a life: Relatedness needs, materialism, and subjective well-being. In Proceedings of the IAREP/SABE World Meeting. Luiss, Rome.Google Scholar
- Moss, B. F. and Schwebel, A. I. 1993. Marriage and romantic relationships: Defining intimacy in romantic relationships. Family Relations 421, 31--37.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Motamedi, N. 2007. Keep in touch: A tactile-vision intimate interface. In Proceedings of the Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 21--22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mueller, F., Vetere, F., Gibbs, M., Kjeldskov, J., Pedell, S., and Howard, S. 2005. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1673--1676. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Myers, D. G. 1999. Close relationships and quality of life. In Well-Being: The Foundation of Hedonic Psychology, D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz Eds., Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY, 374--391.Google Scholar
- Mynatt, E. D., Rowan, J., Craighill, S., and Jacobs, A. 2001. Digital family portraits. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 333--340. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neustaedter, C. and Greenberg, S. 2012. Intimacy in long-distance relationships over video chat. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 753--762. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neustaedter, C., Elliot, K., and Greenberg, S. 2006. Interpersonal awareness in the domestic realm. In Proceedings of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. ACM, New York, NY, 15--22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Noller, P. and Feeney, J. A. 2006. Close Relationships. Functions, Forms, and Processes. Psychology Press, New York.Google Scholar
- O’Brien, S. and Mueller, F. 2006. Holding hands over a distance: Technology probes in an intimate, mobile context. In Proceedings of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. ACM, New York, NY, 293--296. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ogawa, H., Ando, N., and Onodera, S. 2005. SmallConnection: Designing of tangible communication media over networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Multimedia. ACM, New York, NY, 1073--1074. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Otnes, C. and Beltramini, R. F. 1996. Gift Giving: A Research Anthology. Popular Press.Google Scholar
- Partala, T. and Kallinen, A. 2012. Understanding the most satisfying and unsatisfying user experiences: Emotions, psychological needs, and context. Interact. Comput. 241, 25--34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petrelli, D., Whittaker, S., and Brockmeier, J. 2008. Autotopography: What can physical mementos tell us about digital memories? In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 53--62. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pujol, R. S. and Umemuro, H. 2009. Productive love: A new approach for designing affective technology. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 2469--2478. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Regan, P. 2011. Close Relationships. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Reis, H. T. and Rusbult, C. E. 2004. Close Relationships. Psychology Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Reiss, I. L. 1960. Toward a sociology of the heterosexual love relationship. Marriage Family Living 22, 139--145.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rhodes, A. R. 2002. Long-distance relationships in dual-career commuter couples: A review of counselling issues. Family J. 10, 398--404.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richards, J. M., Butler, E. A., and Gross, J. J. 2003. Emotion regulation in romantic relationships: The cognitive consequences of concealing feelings. J. Social Personal Relationships 20, 599--620.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rusbult, C. E. 1980. Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. J. Exp. Social Psych. 16, 172--186.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Amer. Psychologist 551, 68--78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sahlstein, E. 2004. Relating at a distance: Negotiating being together and being apart in long-distance relationships. J. Social Personal Relationships 21, 689--702.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saslis-Lagoudakis, G., Cheverst, K., Dix, A., Fitton, D., and Rouncefield, M. 2006. Hermes@Home: Supporting awareness and intimacy between distant family members. In Proceedings of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. ACM, New York, NY, 23--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shaver, P. R. and Hazan, C. 1988. A biased overview of the study of love. J. Social Personal Relationship 5, 473--501.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., and Kasser, T. 2001. What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. J. Personality Social Psych. 802, 325--339.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Showers, C. J. and Zeigler-Hill, V. 2004. Organization of partner knowledge: Implications for relationship outcomes and longitudinal change. Personality Social Psych. Bull. 30, 1198--1210.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sigman, S. J. 1991. Handling the discontinuous aspects of continuous social relationships: Towards research on the persistence of social forms. Comm. Theory 1, 106--27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stafford, L. 2005. Maintaining Long-Distance and Cross-Residential Relationships. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
- Stafford, L. and Merolla, A. J. 2007. Idealization, reunions, and stability in long-distance dating relationships. J. Social Personal Relationships 24, 1, 37--54.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stafford, L. and Reske, J. R. 1990. Idealization and communication in long-distance premarital relationships. Family Relations 39, 274--279.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sternberg, R. J. 1986. A triangular theory of love. Psych. Rev. 93, 119--135.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Strong, R. and Gaver, W. W. 1996. Feather, scent and shaker: Supporting simple intimacy. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, New York, NY, 443--444.Google Scholar
- Taylor, A. S. and Harper, R. 2002. Age-old practices in the ‘New World’: A study of gift-giving between teenage mobile phone users. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 439--446. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tollmar, K. and Persson, J. 2002. Understanding remote presence. In Proceedings of the Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 41--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tollmar, K., Junestrand, S., and Torgny, O. 2000. Virtually living together. Using multiple-method design in the search for telematic emotional communication. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 83--91. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tsujita, H., Siio, I., and Tsukada, K. 2007. SyncDecor: Appliances for sharing mutual awareness between lovers separated by distance. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 2699--2704. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tsujita, H., Tsukada, K., and Siio, I. 2009. InPhase: A communication system focused on “happy coincidences” of daily behaviors. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 3401--3406. Google ScholarDigital Library
- van Baren, J., Ijsselsteijn, W. A., Markopoulos, P., Romero, N., and de Ruyter, B. 2004. Measuring affective benefits and costs of awareness systems supporting intimate social networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Social Intelligence Design. CTIT Workshop Proceedings Series WP04-02, 13--19.Google Scholar
- Vetere, F., Gibbs, M., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., Mueller, F., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K., and Bunyan, M. 2005. Mediating intimacy: Designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 471--480. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vetere, F., Nolan, M., and Raman, R. A. 2006. Distributed hide-and-seek. In Proceedings of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. ACM, New York, NY, 325--328. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Werner, J., Wettach, R., and Hornecker, E. 2008. United-pulse: Feeling your partner’s pulse. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, New York, NY, 535--538. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wisneski, C., Ishii, H., Dahley, A., Gorbet, M., Brave, S., Ullmer, B., and Yarin, P. 1998. Ambient displays: Turning architectural space into an interface between people and digital information. In Cooperative Buildings: Integrating Information, Organization, and Architecture, N. Streitz, S. Konomi, and H. Burkhardt Eds., Springer, 22--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wood, J. T. and Inman, C. 1993. In a different mode: Masculine styles of communicating closeness. J. Appl. Comm. Resear. 21, 279--295.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yarosh, S., Chew, Y. C., and Abowd, G. D. 2009. Supporting parent-child communication in divorced families. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 67, 192--203. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- All You Need is Love: Current Strategies of Mediating Intimate Relationships through Technology
Recommendations
Positive user experience and medical adherence
DPPI '03: Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfacesNonadherence with medical regimens is a life-threatening problem. This paper discusses how designing positive user experiences can lead to increased patient adherence to medical regimens.The importance of positive affect in relationship to medical ...
A Study of Emotional Communication of Emoticon Based on Russell’s Circumplex Model of Affect
Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design Philosophy and TheoryAbstractWith the rapid spread of the Internet, there are more and more people being fond of using emoticons to convey emotions on the Internet. However, due to the high abstraction of real things and expressions and the arbitrariness in the production of ...
Connecting across the miles: mediating emotional communication for distant loved ones through unconventional artifacts
MobileHCI '18: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services AdjunctAdvances in technologies have enabled a variety of convenient channels for couples in long-distance relationships to communicate and interact over vast distances. However, the hyper-connectivity can be a double-edged sword. Prior research has pointed ...
Comments