ABSTRACT
Personalization of search results offers the potential for significant improvement in information retrieval performance. User interactions with the system and documents during information-seeking sessions provide a wealth of information about user preferences and their task goals. In this paper, we propose methods for analyzing and modeling user search behavior in search sessions to predict document usefulness and then using information to personalize search results. We generate prediction models of document usefulness from behavior data collected in a controlled lab experiment with 32 participants, each completing uncontrolled searching for 4 tasks in the Web. The generated models are then tested with another data set of user search sessions in radically different search tasks and constrains. The documents predicted useful and not useful by the models are used to modify the queries in each search session using a standard relevance feedback technique. The results show that application of the models led to consistently improved performance over a baseline that did not take account of user interaction information. These findings have implications for designing systems for personalized search and improving user search experience.
- Agichtein, E., Brill, E., Dumais, S., & Ragno, R. (2006). Learning user interaction models for predicting web search result preferences. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. (pp. 3--10). Seattle, Washington, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Belkin, N. J., Carballo, J. P., Cool, C., Lin, S., Park, S. Y., Rieh, S. Y., et al. (1998). Rutgers' TREC-6 interactive track experience. Proceedings of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference, 597--610.Google Scholar
- Bierig, R., Cole., M.J., & Gwizdka, J. (2009). A user centered experiment and logging framework for interactive information retrieval. In N.J. Belkin, R. Bierig, G. Buscher, L. van Elst, J. Gwizdka, J. Jose, et al. (Eds), CEUR Workshop Proceedings: 512. Proceedings of the SIGIR 2009 Workshop on Understanding the User: Logging and interpreting user interactions in information search and retrieval, UIIR'2009 (pp. 8--11). Aachen, Germany: CEUR Workshop Proceedings.Google Scholar
- Borlund, P. (2003). The IIR evaluation model: A framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Information Research, 8(3), paper no. 152. Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/8--3/paper152.html.Google Scholar
- Breiman, L. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
- Chapelle, O., Metzler, D., Zhang, Y., and Grinspan, P. (2009). Expected reciprocal rank for graded relevance. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), 2009, 621--630. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fox, S., Karnawat, K., Mydland, M., Dumais, S., & White, T. (2005). Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 23(2), 147--168. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kanoulas, E., Hall, M. Clough, P. Carterette, B., & Sanderson, M. (2012) Overview of the TREC Session Track. In: The Twentieth Text REtrieval Conference Proceedings (TREC 2011). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved on 20 May 2012 at http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec20/t20.proceedings.html.Google Scholar
- Kelly, D. (2005). Implicit feedback: Using behavior to infer relevance. In A. Spink and C. Cole (Eds.) New Directions in Cognitive Information Retrieval (pp.169--186). Netherlands: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
- Kelly, D. & Belkin, N.J. (2004). Display time as implicit feedback: Understanding task effects. In Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 377--384. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1008992.1009057 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kelly, D. & Teevan, J. (2003). Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: A bibliography. SIGIR Forum, 37(2), 18--28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li, Y. & Belkin, N.J. (2008). A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking. Inf. Process. Manage. 44, 6 (November 2008), 1822--1837. DOI=10.1016/j.ipm.2008.07.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2008.07.005 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liu, C., Gwizdka, J., & Liu, J. (2010). Helping identify when users find useful documents: examination of query reformulation intervals. In Proceeding of the third symposium on Information interaction in context (IIiX '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 215--224. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1840784.1840816 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liu, J. & Belkin, N.J. (2010). Personalizing information retrieval for multi-session tasks: The roles of task stage and task type. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development on Information Retrieval (SIGIR '10). Geneva, Switzland, July 19--23, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Loper, E. and Bird, S. (2002). NLTK: The Natural Language Toolkit. Proceedings of the ACL02 Workshop on Effective tools and methodologies for teaching natural language processing and computational linguistics, Volume 1, July, 2002 Association for Computational Linguistics. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Teevan, J., Dumais, S.T., and Horvitz, E. (2010). Potential for personalization. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 17, 1, 1--31. Google ScholarDigital Library
- White, R. W. & Kelly, D. (2006). A study on the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback performance. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (pp. 297--306). Arlington, Virginia, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- White, R.W., Ruthven, I., and Jose, J.M. (2005). A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback. In Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 35--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Personalization of search results using interaction behaviors in search sessions
Recommendations
Implicit acquisition of context for personalization of information retrieval systems
CaRR '11: Proceedings of the 2011 Workshop on Context-awareness in Retrieval and RecommendationOne major problem of most current information retrieval systems is that they provide uniform access and retrieval results to all users solely based on the query terms users issued to the system. In this paper, we propose a model to personalize the ...
Search behaviors in different task types
JCDL '10: Proceedings of the 10th annual joint conference on Digital librariesPersonalization of information retrieval tailors search towards individual users to meet their particular information needs by taking into account information about users and their contexts, often through implicit sources of evidence such as user ...
The effect of task type and topic familiarity on information search behaviors
IIiX '10: Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in contextThe paper describes results from a task-driven experiment on Web users' search behaviors. Subjects' search behavior and search experience in three types of search tasks (Fact Finding, Hierarchical Information Gathering, and Parallel Information ...
Comments