skip to main content
10.1145/2342441.2342446acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Kandoo: a framework for efficient and scalable offloading of control applications

Published:13 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Limiting the overhead of frequent events on the control plane is essential for realizing a scalable Software-Defined Network. One way of limiting this overhead is to process frequent events in the data plane. This requires modifying switches and comes at the cost of visibility in the control plane. Taking an alternative route, we propose Kandoo, a framework for preserving scalability without changing switches. Kandoo has two layers of controllers: (i) the bottom layer is a group of controllers with no interconnection, and no knowledge of the network-wide state, and (ii) the top layer is a logically centralized controller that maintains the network-wide state. Controllers at the bottom layer run only local control applications (i.e., applications that can function using the state of a single switch) near datapaths. These controllers handle most of the frequent events and effectively shield the top layer. Kandoo's design enables network operators to replicate local controllers on demand and relieve the load on the top layer, which is the only potential bottleneck in terms of scalability. Our evaluations show that a network controlled by Kandoo has an order of magnitude lower control channel consumption compared to normal OpenFlow networks.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

hotsdn-i-04-kandoo.mp4

mp4

36.2 MB

References

  1. OpenFlow Switch Specification, Version 1.2 (Wire Protocol 0x03). http://tinyurl.com/84kelcj.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Station and Media Access Control Connectivity Discovery, IEEE Standard 802.1AB. http://tinyurl.com/6s739pe.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Alizadeh, A. Greenberg, D. A. Maltz, J. Padhye, P. Patel, B. Prabhakar, S. Sengupta, and M. Sridharan. Data center tcp (dctcp). In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2010 conference, pages 63--74, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. R. Curtis, W. Kim, and P. Yalagandula. Mahout: Low-overhead datacenter traffic management using end-host-based elephant detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2011 conference, pages 1629--1637, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. R. Curtis, J. C. Mogul, J. Tourrilhes, P. Yalagandula, P. Sharma, and S. Banerjee. DevoFlow: scaling flow management for high-performance networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2011 conference, pages 254--265, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Decasper and B. Plattner. DAN: distributed code caching for active networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM'98 conference, volume 2, pages 609--616, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Greenhalgh, F. Huici, M. Hoerdt, P. Papadimitriou, M. Handley, and L. Mathy. Flow processing and the rise of commodity network hardware. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 39(2):20--26, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. Koponen, M. Casado, N. Gude, J. Stribling, L. Poutievski, M. Zhu, R. Ramanathan, Y. Iwata, H. Inoue, T. Hama, and S. Shenker. Onix: a distributed control platform for large-scale production networks. In Proceedings of the 9th USENIX OSDI conference, pages 1--6, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. Lantz, B. Heller, and N. McKeown. A network in a laptop: rapid prototyping for software-defined networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM HotNets workshop, pages 19:1--19:6, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. C. A. B. Macapuna, C. E. Rothenberg, and F. Magalh. In-packet bloom filter based data center networking with distributed openow controllers. In Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Management of Emerging Networks and Services, pages 584--588, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. Pfaff, J. Pettit, T. Koponen, K. Amidon, M. Casado, and S. Shenker. Extending networking into the virtualization layer. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM HotNets workshop, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Schwartz, A. W. Jackson, W. T. Strayer, W. Zhou, R. D. Rockwell, and C. Partridge. Smart packets: applying active networks to network management. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 18(1):67--88, Feb. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. V. Sekar, N. Egi, S. Ratnasamy, M. K. Reiter, and G. Shi. Design and implementation of a consolidated middlebox architecture. In Proceedings of NSDI 12, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Sherwood, M. Chan, A. Covington, G. Gibb, M. Flajslik, N. Handigol, T. Huang, P. Kazemian, M. Kobayashi, J. Naous, S. Seetharaman, D. Underhill, T. Yabe, K. Yap, Y. Yiakoumis, H. Zeng, G. Appenzeller, R. Johari, N. McKeown, and G. Parulkar. Carving research slices out of your production networks with OpenFlow. SIGCOMM CCR, 40(1):129--130, Jan 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Shieh, S. Kandula, and E. G. Sirer. Sidecar: building programmable datacenter networks without programmable switches. In Proceedings of the ACM HotNets worksop, pages 21:1--21:6, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. M. Smith, D. J. Farber, C. A. Gunter, S. M. Nettles, D. C. Feldmeier, and W. D. Sincoskie. SwitchWare: accelerating network evolution (White paper). Technical report, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A.-W. Tam, K. Xi, and H. Chao. Use of devolved controllers in data center networks. In Processings of the IEEE Computer Communications Workshops, pages 596--601, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Tootoonchian and Y. Ganjali. Hyperow: a distributed control plane for openow. In Proceedings of the 2010 INM conference, pages 3--3, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. J. Wetherall, J. V. Guttag, and D. L. Tennenhouse. ANTS: a toolkit for building and dynamically deploying network protocols. In Proceedings of the IEEE Open Architectures and Network Programming conference, pages 117--129, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. D. J. Wetherall and D. L. Tennenhouse. The ACTIVE IP option. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGOPS European workshop on systems support for worldwide applications, pages 33--40, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Yu, J. Rexford, M. J. Freedman, and J. Wang. Scalable flow-based networking with DIFANE. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2010 conference, pages 351--362, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Kandoo: a framework for efficient and scalable offloading of control applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HotSDN '12: Proceedings of the first workshop on Hot topics in software defined networks
      August 2012
      142 pages
      ISBN:9781450314770
      DOI:10.1145/2342441

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 August 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate88of198submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader