skip to main content
10.1145/2245276.2245445acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Model Management Systems vs. Model Driven Engineering: a case study

Published:26 March 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research in the field of Model-Driven Development follows two main approaches: Model Management Systems and Model-Driven Engineering. The former comes from the field of Databases whereas the latter has its roots in the Software Engineering community. This paper presents a practical comparison of the two approaches in order to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each one. More specifically, we have compared MIDST and ATL, as representative technological solutions for a Model Management System and Model-Driven Engineering respectively. This has been achieved by carrying out a case study based on the transformation of Entity-Relationship schemas into Object-Relational schemas. The conclusion reached is that, although the use of MIDST is, in general, more complex, in data model domains the benefits of its use compensate for its complexity. However, in other domains, such as those which are Service-Oriented, ATL may be more intuitive.

References

  1. Atzeni, P., Cappellari, P., Bernstein, P. A.: Model-independent schema and data translation. In: Ioannidis, Y., Scholl, M. H., Schmidt, J. W., Matthes, F., Hatzopoulos, M., Bohm, K., Kemper, A., Grust, T., Böhm, C. (eds.) EDBT. LNCS, vol. 3896, pp. 368--385. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Atzeni, P., Cappellari, P., Torlone, R., Bernstein, P. A., Gianforme, G.: Model Independent schema translation. VLDB J. 17(6), 1347--1370 (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Atzeni, P., Bellomarini, L., Bugiotti, F. and Gianforme, G.: A runtime approach to model-independent schema and data translation. EDBT -- ACM. March, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bernstein, P. A.: Applying model management to classical meta data problems. In: CIDR, pp. 209--220 (2003)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein, P. A., Melnik, S.: Model management 2.0: manipulating richer mappings. In: SIGMOD Conference, pp. 1--12. ACM, New York (2007) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bézivin, J. (2004). In search of a Basic Principle for Model Driven Engineering. Novatica/Upgrade, V(2), 21--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bezivin, J., Jouault, F., Touzet, D. (2005). An introduction to the ATLAS Model Management Architecture (LINA Research Report N°05.01). Nantes: University of Nantes. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://www.sciences.univ-nantes.fr/lina/atl/www/papers/RR-LINA2005-01.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Budinsky, F., Merks, E., & Steinberg, D. (2008). Eclipse Modeling Framework 2.0 (2nd Edition): Addison-Wesley Professional.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cáceres, P., De Castro, V., Vara, J. M. and Marcos, E. Model Transformations for Hypertext Modeling on Web Information Systems. In: SAC '06. Proc. of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM Press, New York, pp. 1232--1239, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jouault, F., & Kurtev, I. (2006). Transforming Models with ATL. In Satellite Events at the MoDELS 2005 Conference (pp. 128--138). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. OMG. MDA Guide Version 1.0. Document number omg/2003-05-01. Ed.: Miller, J. and Mukerji, J. Retrieved from: http://www.omg.com/mda, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. OMG, Object Constraint Language Specification (OCL), version 2.0. OMG Document - formal/2006-05-01Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. OMG. The Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification, Version 2.0. OMG Document - formal/06-01-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Vara, J. M, M2DAT: a Technical Solution for Model-Driven Development of Web Information Systems. PhD Thesis. University Rey Juan Carlos, November 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Model Management Systems vs. Model Driven Engineering: a case study

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SAC '12: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
              March 2012
              2179 pages
              ISBN:9781450308571
              DOI:10.1145/2245276
              • Conference Chairs:
              • Sascha Ossowski,
              • Paola Lecca

              Copyright © 2012 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 26 March 2012

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              SAC '12 Paper Acceptance Rate270of1,056submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader