skip to main content
10.1145/2044354.2044378acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SPEED: prédiction de cibles

Published:24 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the SPEED method to predict endpoints, based on analysis of the kinetic characteristics of the pointing gesture. Our model splits the gesture into an acceleration phase and a deceleration phase to precisely detect target. The first phase allows us to identify a velocity peak that marks the beginning of the second phase. This phase is approached with a quadratic model to predict gesture endpoint. A pilot study shows that SPEED predicts a target more precisely than other existing methods, for 1D tasks without distractors.

References

  1. J. Accot and S. Zhai. Refining fitts' law models for bivariate pointing. In Proc. ACM SIGCHI, pages 193--200, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. Appert, O. Chapuis, and M. Beaudoin-Lafon. Evaluation of Pointing Performance on Screen Edges. In Proc. ACM AVI, Napoli, Italy, May 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. Asano, E. Sharlin, Y. Kitamura, K. Takashimai, and F. Kishino. Predictive Interaction using the Delphian Desktop. In Proc. ACM UIST, pages 133--141, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Baudisch, E. Cutrell, D. Robbins, M. Czewinski, P. Tandler, B. Bederson, and A. Zierlinger. Drag-and-Pop and Drag-and-Pick: techniques for accessing remote screen content on touch- and pen-operated systems. In Proc. of Interact 2003, pages 57--64, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. Bizzi, N. Accornero, W. Chapple, and N. Hogan. Posture Control and Trajectory Formation during Arm Movement. Journal of Neuroscience, 4(11):2738--2744, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R. Blanch and M. Ortega. Benchmarking Pointing Techniques with Distractors: Adding a Density Factors to Fitt's Pointing Paradigm. In Proc. ACM CHI, Vancouver, Canada, May 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Elliott, W. F. Helsen, and R. Chua. A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two component-model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological bulletin, 127(3):342--357, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. P. M. Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47:381--391, 1954.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. R. Flanagan and D. J. Ostry. Trajectories of Human Multi-Joint Arm Movements: Evidence of Joint Level Planning, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. Grossman and R. Balakrishnan. Pointing at Trivariate Targets in 3d Environments. In Proc. ACM SIGCHI, pages 447--454, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Guiard, R. Blanch, and M. Beaudoin-Lafon. Object Pointing: A Complement to Bitmap Pointing in GUIs. In Proc. Graphic Interfaces '04, pages 9--16, May 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. N. Hogan. An organizing principle for a class of volountary movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 4(11):2745--2754, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. H. Iwase and A. Murata. Modelling of human's three-dimensional movement - extending fitts' model to three-dimensional pointing task-. In Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 594--599, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. T. Kang, J. He, and S. I. H. Tillery. Determining natural arm configuration along a reaching trajectory. In Proc. IEEE Engineering in Medecine and Biology Society, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. E. Lank, Y.-C. N. Cheng, and J. Ruiz. Endpoint Predictions Using Motion Kinematics. In Proc. ACM SIGCHI, pages 637--646, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. I. S. MacKenzie and W. Buxton. Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks. In Proc. ACM SIGCHI, pages 219--226, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. J. McGuffin and R. Balakrishnan. Fitts Law and Expanding Targets: Experimental Studies and Designs for User Interfaces. ACM ToCHI, 12(4):338--422, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Ruiz and E. Lank. Effects of Target Size and Distance on Kinematics Endpoint Prediction. Technical report, Univ. of Waterloo, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J. Ruiz and E. Lank. Speeding Pointing in Tiled Widgets: Understanding the Effects of Target Expansion and Misprediction. In Proc. ACM IUI, Hong Kong, China, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. SPEED: prédiction de cibles

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        IHM '11: Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine
        October 2011
        169 pages
        ISBN:9781450308229
        DOI:10.1145/2044354

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 October 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate103of199submissions,52%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader