skip to main content
10.1145/2001576.2001609acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evolution of neural symmetry and its coupled alignment to body plan morphology

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 July 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Body morphology is thought to have heavily influenced the evolution of neural architecture. However, the extent of this interaction and its underlying principles are largely unclear. To help us elucidate these principles, we examine the artificial evolution of a hypothetical nervous system embedded in a fish-inspired animat. The aim is to observe the evolution of neural structures in relation to both body morphology and required motor primitives. Our investigations reveal that increasing the pressure to evolve a wider range of movements also results in higher levels of neural symmetry. We further examine how different body shapes affect the evolution of neural structure; we find that, in order to achieve optimal movements, the neural structure integrates and compensates for asymmetrical body morphology. Our study clearly indicates that different parts of the animat - specifically, nervous system and body plan - evolve in concert with and become highly functional with respect to the other parts. The autonomous emergence of morphological and neural computation in this model contributes to unveiling the surprisingly strong coupling of such systems in nature.

References

  1. T. Bäck and H.-P. Schwefel. An overview of evolutionary algorithms for parameter optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 1(1):1--23, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Blynel and D. Floreano. Levels of dynamics and adaptive behavior in evolutionary neural controllers. In From animals to animats: The seventh international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior, pages 272--281, Cambridge, MA, 2002. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Bongard. Morphological change in machines accelerates the evolution of robust behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(4):1234--1239, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. Bongard and R. Pfeifer. Evolving complete agents using artificial ontogeny. In Morpho-functional Machines: The New Species (Designing Embodied Intelligence), pages 237--258. Springer, Berlin, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J.C. Bongard. Incremental Approaches to the Combined Evolution of a Robot's Body and Brain. PhD thesis, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich, Zürich, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J.C. Bongard and C. Paul. Investigating morphological symmetry and locomotive efficiency using virtual embodied evolution. In From Animals to Animats: The Sixth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, Cambridge, MA, 2000. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. V. Braitenberg. Vehicles: Experiments in synthetic psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Broun, S. Sokol, and H.R. Bode. Cngsc, a homologue of goosecoid, participates in the patterning of the head, and is expressed in the organizer region of Hydra. Development, 126:5245--5254, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J.R. Finnerty. The origins of axial patterning in the metazoa: how old is bilateral symmetry? International Journal of Developmental Biology, 47(7--8):523--529, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Ghysen. The origin and evolution of the nervous system. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 47(8):555--562, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. N.D. Holland. Early central nervous systems evolution: an era of skin brains? Nature reviews, 4(8):617--627, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Jones. The Evolutionary Emergence of Neural Organisation in Computational Models of Primitive Organisms. PhD thesis, Computer Science, University of Bimringham, Birmingham, UK, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. B. Jones, Y. Jin, B. Sendhoff, and X. Yao. Evolving functional symmetry in a three dimensional model of an elongated organism. In Artificial Life XI: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems, pages 305--312, Cambridge, MA, 2008. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. B. Jones, Y. Jin, X. Yao, and B. Sendhoff. Evolution of neural organization in a hydra-like animat. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Neural Information Processing of the Asia-Pacific Neural Network Assembly, volume 1, pages 216--223, Berlin, 2008. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Manuel. Early evolution of symmetry and polarity in metazoan body plans. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 332(2--3):184--209, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M.Q. Martindale, J.R. Finnerty, and J.Q. Henry. The Radiata and the evolutionary origins of the bilaterian body plan. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 24(3):358--365, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. H. Meinhardt. The radial-symmetric hydra and the evolution of the bilateral body plan: an old body become a young brain. BioEssays, 24:181--191, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. H. Meinhardt. Different strategies for midline formation in bilaterians. Nature, 5:502--510, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Y. Murakami, K. Uchida, F.M. Rijli, and S. Kuratani. Evolution of the brain developmental plan: insights from agnathans. Developmental Biology, 280(2):249--259, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. R.W. Paine and J. Tani. How hierarchical control self-organizes in artificial adaptive systems. Adaptive Behavior, 13(3):211--225, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. Sarma and K. De Jong. An analysis of the effects of neighborhood size and shape on local selection algorithms. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature -- PPSN IV, volume 1141, pages 236--244, Berlin, 1996. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. L. Schramm, Y. Jin, and B. Sendhoff. Emerged coupling of motor control and morphological development in evolution of multi-cellular animats. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Artificial Life, pages 25--32, Berlin, 2009. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M. Sfakiotakis and D.P. Tsakiris. Simuun: A simulation environment for undulatory locomotion. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 26(4):350--358, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. M.A. Shenk, H.R. Bode, and R.E. Steele. Expression of Cnox-2, a HOM/HOX homeobox gene in hydra, is correlated with axial pattern formation. Development, 117:657--667, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. K. Sims. Evolving 3D morphology and behavior by competition. Artificial Life, 1(4):353--372, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Soltoggio, J.A. Bullinaria, C. Mattiussi, P. Dürr, and D. Floreano. Evolutionary Advantages of Neuromodulated Plasticity in Dynamic, Reward-based Scenarios. In Artificial Life XI: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems, pages 569--576, Cambridge, MA, 2008. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. K.O. Stanley, D.B. D'Ambrosio, and J. Gauci. A hypercube-based encoding for evolving large-scale neural networks. Artificial Life, 15(2):185--212, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. L. Steels and R. Brooks, editors. The Artificial Life Route to Artificial Intelligence: Building Embodied, Situated Agents. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evolution of neural symmetry and its coupled alignment to body plan morphology

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '11: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
      July 2011
      2140 pages
      ISBN:9781450305570
      DOI:10.1145/2001576

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 July 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader