skip to main content
10.1145/1978942.1979078acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Homebrew databases: complexities of everyday information management in nonprofit organizations

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many people manage a complex assortment of digital information in their lives. Volunteer coordinators at nonprofit organizations are no exception; they collectively manage information about millions of volunteers every year. Yet current information management systems are insufficient for their needs. In this paper, we present results of a qualitative study of the information management practices of volunteer coordinators. We identify the resource constraints and the diverse and fluid information needs, stakeholders, and work contexts that motivate their information management strategies. We characterize the assemblages of information systems that volunteer coordinators have created to satisfice their needs as 'homebrew databases.' Finally, we identify additional information management challenges that result from the use of these 'homebrew databases,' highlighting deficiencies in the appropriateness and usability of databases and information management systems, more generally.

References

  1. Barreau, D. and Nardi, B.A. Finding and reminding: File organization from the desktop. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 27, 3 (1995), 39--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bellotti, V., Ducheneaut, N., Howard, M., Smith, I. and Grinter, R.E. Quality versus quantity: E-mail-centric task management and its relation with overload. Human-Computer Interaction 20, 1 (2005), 89--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bergman, O., Beyth-Maron, R. and Nachmias, R. The project fragmentation problem in personal information management. Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 271--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Boardman, R. and Sasse, M.A. "Stuff goes into the computer and doesn't come out": A cross-tool study of personal information management. Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 583--590. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brudney, J.L. Designing and managing volunteer programs. In R.D. Herman (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1994), 279--302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. Volunteering in the United States-2009. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/volun.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Burt, E. and Taylor, J.A. Information and communication technologies: Reshaping voluntary organizations? Nonprofit Management & Leadership 11, 2 (2000), 131--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.) Sage Publications, Los Angeles, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Date, C.J. Database usability. ACM SIGMOD Record 13, 4 (1983), 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Goecks, J., Voida, A., Voida, S. and Mynatt, E.D. Charitable technologies: Opportunities for collaborative computing in nonprofit fundraising. Proc. CSCW 2008, ACM Press (2008), 689--698. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jagadish, H.V., Chapman, A., Elkiss, A., Jayapandian, M., Li, Y., Nandi, A. and Yu, C. Making database systems usable. Proc. SIGMOD 2007, ACM Press (2007), 13--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kidd, A. The marks are on the knowledge worker. Proc. CHI 1994, ACM Press (1994), 186--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Le Dantec, C.A. and Edwards, W.K. Across boundaries of influence and accountability: The multiple scales of public sector information systems. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 113--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Le Dantec, C.A. and Edwards, W.K. The view from the trenches: Organization, power, and technology at two nonprofit homeless outreach centers. Proc. CSCW 2008, ACM Press (2008), 589--598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mackay, W.E. Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction 6, 4 (1999), 311--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. McPhail, B., Constantino, T., Bruckmann, D., Barclay, R. and Clement, A. CAVEAT exemplar: Participatory design in a non-profit volunteer organisation. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 7, 3--4 (1998), 223--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Merkel, C., Farooq, U., Xiao, L., Ganoe, C., Rosson, M.B. and Carroll, J.M. Managing technology use and learning in nonprofit community organizations: Methodological challenges and opportunities. Proc. CHIMIT 2007, ACM Press (2007), Article 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. National Center for Charitable Statistics. National taxonomy of exempt entities. http://nccs.urban.org/ classification/NTEE.cf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Palen, L. Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems. Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sease, R. and McDonald, D.W. Musical fingerprints: Collaboration around home media collections. Proc. GROUP 2009, ACM Press (2009), 331--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sellen, A.J. and Harper, R.H.R. The myth of the paperless office. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Shneiderman, B. Improving the human factors aspect of database interactions. ACM Trans. Database Systems 3, 4 (1978), 417--439. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Stoll, J., Edwards, W.K. and Mynatt, E.D. Interorganizational coordination and awareness in a nonprofit ecosystem. Proc. CSCW 2010, ACM Press (2010), 51--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Urban Institute. Volunteer management capacity in America's charities and congregations: A briefing report, 2004. http://www.urban.org/publications/410963.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Whittaker, S. and Sidner, C. Email overload: Exploring personal information management of email. Proc. CHI 1996, ACM Press (1996), 276--283.. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Homebrew databases: complexities of everyday information management in nonprofit organizations
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 2011
            3530 pages
            ISBN:9781450302289
            DOI:10.1145/1978942

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 May 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI '11 Paper Acceptance Rate410of1,532submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader