skip to main content
10.1145/1935701.1935703acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

User-interfaces based on the water-hammer effect: water-hammer piano as an interactive percussion surface

Published:22 January 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Water hammer, a well known phenomenon occurring in water pipes and plumbing fixtures, is generally considered destructive and undesirable. We propose the use of water hammer for a musical instrument akin to hammered percussion instruments like hammered dulcimer, piano, etc. In one embodiment, the instrument comprises an array of mouths each for being struck with the open palm or fingers, each mouth connected to a separate hydraulic resonator. In another embodiment, we use a basin or pool of water as a multitouch user-interface where sounds made by water are acoustically sensed by an array of hydrophones (underwater listening devices). Using water itself as a touch surface creates a fun and playful user interface medium that captures the fluidity of the water's ebb and flow.

References

  1. M. B. Alonso and D. V. Keyson. MusicCube: making digital music tangible. ACM CHI, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. E. B. Baker. The Mathematical Theory of Huygens Principle. Oxford Univ. Press, London, 2 edition, 1950.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. Bouwkamp. Diffraction theory. Rep. Prog. Phys., 17:35--100, 1954.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. P. Clemmow. The Plane Wave Spectrum Representation of Electromagnetic Fields. Pergammon Press, London, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. W. Goodman. Introduction to Fourier Optics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Ishii. Bottles: A transparent interface as a tribute to mark weiser. IEICE Trans. on Info. and Systems, pages Vol. E87-D, No. 6, pp. 1299--1311, June 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Janzen and S. Mann. Arrays of water jets as user interfaces: Detection and estimation of flow by listening to turbulence signatures using hydrophones. In Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, September 24-29, Augsburg, Germany, pages 505--8, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. J. Kartomi. On Concepts and Classifications of Musical Instruments. Chicago Studies in Ethnomusicology (CSE). University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. E. W. M. Born. Principles of Optics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 6 edition, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. Machover. Hyperinstruments: A composer's approach to the evolution of intelligent musical instruments. In W. Freeman, editor, Cyberarts. Spartan Books, San Francisco, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Mann. Physiphones... In Proc. New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Mann, R. Janzen, R. Lo, and C. Aimone. Inventing new instruments based on a computational "hack" to make a badly tuned or unpitched instrument play in perfect harmony. In Proc. International Computer Music Conference, ICMC '07, August 27-31, Copenhagen, Denmark, volume 1, pages 105--112, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Mann, R. Janzen, and M. Post. Hydraulophone design considerations: Absement, displacement, and velocity-sensitive music keyboard in which each key is a water jet. In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM international conference on Mu ltimedia, October 23-27, Santa Barbara, USA., pages 519--528, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. V. D. Mark Ellingham, Orla Duane, editor. World Music: The Rough Guide (Africa, Europe and the Middle East). London: Rough Guides, Ltd., dist. by Penguin, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. K. R. D. B. NK. Effects of a water-based program on women 65 years and over: a randomised controlled trial. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 52(2):102--8, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Richards. The Wave Organ. Exploratorium. http://www.exploratorium.edu/visit/wave organ.html, Accessed 2005-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. C. Sachs. The History of Musical Instruments. Norton, New York, 1940.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. K. van Mensvoort. Datafountain: Money translated to water. Online documentation by the inventor. http://www.koert.com/work/datafountain/, 2005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. R. Vertegaal and I. Poupyrev. Organic user interfaces. Communications of the ACM, 51:26--30, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. W. Young. Terminology for logarithmic frequency units. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 11(1):134--139, July 1939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. User-interfaces based on the water-hammer effect: water-hammer piano as an interactive percussion surface

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader