skip to main content
article
Free Access

Separation for boundary to CSG conversion

Published:02 January 1993Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1 BROWN, C. K. PADL-2: A technical summary. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 2, 2 (Mar. 1982), 69-84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 COLLINS, G.E. Quantifier elimination for real closed fields by cylindrical algebraic decomposition. In Proceedings of the 2nd GI Conference on Automata Theory and Formal Languages. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 33, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975, pp. 134-183. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 COSTE, M., A~O ROY, M. F. Thom's lemma, the coding of real algebraic numbers and the computation of the topology of semi-algebraic sets. J. Symbolic Comput. 5, 1 (1988), 121-129. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 DO CARMO, M.P. Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 G^RRIT~, T., ^NO WARREN, J. Geometric continuity. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 8, 1 (Feb. 1991), 51-65. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 Gmcog'~v, D.Y. Complexity of deciding Tarski algebra. J. Symbolic Comput. 5, i (1988), 65-108. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 GUILLEMIN, V., AND POLLACK, A. Topology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 HEtNTZ, J. Definability and fast quantifier elimination in algebraically closed fields. Theor. Comput. Sci. 24 (1983), 239-277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 HOFFMANN, C. H. Geometric and Solid Modeling. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, Calif., 1989. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 HOPF, H. Differential Geometry in the Large. 2nd ed. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1000. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 KENI)IG, K. Elementary Algebraic Geometry. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 KUI~TOWSKI, K., AND MOSTOWSKI, A. Set Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 M~, M. An Introduction to Solid Modeling. Computer Science Press, Rockville, Md., 1988. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 M^SSEY, S.W. A Basic Course in Algebraic Topology. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 McKINsEY, J. C. C,, AND TARSKI, A. On closed elements in closure algebras. Ann. Math. 47, 1 (Jan. 1946), 122-162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 MmLER, J. R. Architectural issues in solid modelers. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 9, 5 (Sept. 1989) 72-87. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 PATRIKALAg~S, N. M., ANo KRIEZlS, G.A. Representation of piecewise continuous algebraic surfaces in terms of B-splines. Vis. Comput. 5, (1989), 360-374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 REQUIC~, A. A.G. Mathematical models of rigid solid objects. Tech. Memo 28, Production Automation Project, Univ. of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y., Nov. 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 REQUICHA, A. A. G. Representations for rigid solids: Theory, methods, and systems. Cornput. Surv. (ACM) 12, 4 (Dec. 1980), 437-464. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20 REQUICHA, A. A. G., AND TILOVE, R. B. Mathematical foundations of constructive solid geometry: General topology of closed regular sets. Tech. Memo 27a, Production Automation Project, Univ. of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y., June 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 REQWCHA, A. A. G., AND VO~LCKER, H.B. Constructive solid geometry. Tech. Memo 25, Production Automation Project, Univ. of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y., 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22 REQUICHA, A. A. G., AND VOELCKER, H.B. Boolean operations in solid modeling: Boundary evaluation and merging algorithms. Proc. IEEE 73, 1 (Jan. 1985), 30-44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23 SEI)ERBERG, T.W. Piecewise algebraic surface patches. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 2, 1-3 (Sept. 1985), 53-59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24 S~Pmo, V. Representations of semi-algebraic sets in finite algebras generated by space decompositions. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell Programmable Automation, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y., Feb. 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25 SHAPIRO, V., AND VOSSLER, D. L. Construction and optimization of CSG representations. Comput.-Aided Des. 23, 1 (Jam/Feb. 1991), 4-20. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26 SHAPIRO, V., AND VOSSLER, D. L. Boundary-based separation for Brep ~ CSG conversion. Tech. Rep. 91-1222, Dept. of Computer Science, Cornell Univ., Aug. 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27 SH^mm), V., ANt) VOSSI,ER, D. L. Efficient CSG representations of two-dimensional solids. Trans. ASME, J. Mech. Des. 113, 3 (Sept. 1991), 292-305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28 Sn,v^, C. E. Alternative definitions of faces in boundary representations of solid objects. Tech. Memo 36, Production Automation Project, Univ. of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y., 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29 SNYI)ER, V., AND SISAM, C.H. Analytic Geometry of Space. Henry Holt, New York, 1914.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Separation for boundary to CSG conversion

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader