ABSTRACT
This project has involved testing a Packbot Scout within a SWAT-unit for five months. This was done to explore the tactical benefits of the system and to test the robot's technical performance with end users. Another objective was to compare earlier results -- obtained by investigating military during training -- with results from deployment during true risk. The SWAT-team, equipped with and trained to use the robot, set a standard to bring it with them on regular missions. Using the robot during negotiation proved to be the most beneficial application. Other uses would be for long-term surveillances and deploying non-lethal weapons. Early results indicate that the Stockholm SWAT-unit, consisting of 80 active officers, could deploy the robot at least 20 times a year.
- Lundberg, C., Forthcoming: Assessment and evaluation of robots for dismounted high risk workers in urban settings, PhD Dissertation Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, October 2007.Google Scholar
- Birchall, P., The Longest Walk: The World of Bomb Disposal. London: Arms&Armour, 1997.Google Scholar
- Schneider, F., European Land-Robot Trial (ELROB), FGAN, Hammelburg, Germany. Retrived Febuary 1, 2007 from: http://www.melrob.eu/Google Scholar
- Carroll, D., Nguyen, C., Everett, H. R., and Frederick, B., Development and Testing for Physical Security Robots, SPIE Proc. 5804: Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, Orlando, FL, USA, March 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barnes, M., Everett, H. R., and P. Rudakevych, ThrowBot: Design Considerations for a Man-Portable Throwable Robot, SPIE Proc. 5804: Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, Orlando, FL, USA, March 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ebert, K. A. and B. V. Stratton, Supporting the Joint Warfighter by Development, Training and Fielding of Man-Portable UGVs, SPIE Proc. 5804: Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, Orlando, FL, March 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- SPAWAR System Center San Diego, Man-Portable Robotic System, Retrieved March 7, 2007 from: http://www.nosc.mil/robots/land/mprs/mprs.htmlGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Army, Future Combat System. Retrieved May 11, 2007 from: http://www.army.mil/fcs/sugv.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Department of Defense,. Report to congress: Development and Utilization of Robotics and Unmanned Ground Vehicles, USA. October 2006.Google Scholar
- Ashley, J., FCS Update. Unmanned Systems, Vol 24, Nr 2, pp. 17--23, Mars/Apr 2006.Google Scholar
- Smith Detection, Smiths Supplies Lightweight Chemical Detector to Advanced CRBN Detection Robot, Retrieved February 5, 2007 from: http://www.smithsdetection.com/PressRelease.asp?autonum=114Google Scholar
- Foster-Miller, Inc., TALON Robots, Retrieved February 5, 2007 from: http://www.foster-miller.com/lemming.htmGoogle Scholar
- Gardner, C. W., Treado, P. J., Jochem, T. M., Gilbert, G. R., Demonstration of a Robot-based Raman Spectroscopic Detector for the Identification of CBE Threat Agents, Proceedings of 25th Army Science Conference, Orlando, USA, 2006.Google Scholar
- ROBOTIC FX, NEGOTIATOR, Tactical Surveillance Robot. Retrieved May 11, 2007 from: http://www.roboticfx.com/Google Scholar
- Murphy, R. R., Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, special issue on Human-Robot Interaction, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp: 125--137, May 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hisanori, A., Present Status and Problems of Fire Fighting Robots, Proceedings of Society of Instrument and Control Engineers Annual Conference, Osaka, Japan, 2002.Google Scholar
- Matsuno, F., Tadokoro, S., Rescue Robots and Systems in Japan. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Shenyang, China, 2004.Google Scholar
- Scholtz, J., Young, J., Drury, J. L., and Yanco, H. A., Evaluation of human-robot interaction awareness in search and rescue. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, New Orleans, USA, 2004.Google Scholar
- Yanco, H. Drury, J., and Scholtz, J., Beyond Usability Evaluation: Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction at a Major Robotics Competition, Human-Computer Interaction Journal, No 1, January 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- White, J., Harvey, H., Farnstrom, K., Testing of mobile surveillance robot at a nuclear power plant. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, NC, USA, 1987.Google Scholar
- Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., Sakamoto, K., Tanie, K., Robot assisted activity at a health service facility for the aged for 17 months: an interim report of long-term experiment. Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, Nagoya, Japan, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Huttenrauch, H., Eklundh, K. S., Fetch-and-carry with CERO: observations from a long-term user study with a service robot. In Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Berlin, Germany, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tomatis, N., Terrien, G., Piguet, R., Burnier, D., Bouabdallah, S. Arras, K. O., Siegwart, R., "Designing a secure and robust mobile interacting robot for the long term. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, 2003.Google Scholar
- Leger, P. C., Trebi-Ollennu, A., Wright, J. R., Maxwell, S. A., Bonitz, R. G., Biesiadecki, J. J., Hartman, F. R., Cooper, B. K., Baumgartner, E. T., Maimone, M. W., Mars Exploration Rover surface operations: driving spirit at Gusev Crater. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 2005.Google Scholar
- Kumagai, J., Techno Cops - police robotic and electronic technology, Spectrum, IEEE, Vol 39, Issue 12, pp. 34--39, Dec 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scheible, S., Robot helps end standoff: SWAT team uses new technology in arrest of Hingham man suspected of assault. Retrieved May 11, 2007 from: http://www.patriotledger.com/articles/2007/04/02/news/news01.txtGoogle Scholar
- Metacafe, Video: Robots Making Police Jobs Safer. Retrieved May 11, 2007 from: http://www.metacafe.com/watch/399031/robots_making_police_jobs_safer/Google Scholar
- Jones, H. L., Rock S. M., Burns D.,&Morris, S., Autonomous robots in SWAT applications: Research, design, and operations challenges. In Proceedings of AUVSI International Conference on Unmanned Vehicles, Orlando, FL, USA, 2002.Google Scholar
- Nguyen, H., Bott, J., Robotics for Law Enforcement: Applications Beyond Explosive Ordnance Disposal, SPIE Proc. 4232: Technologies for Law Enforcement, Boston, MA, USA, November 2000.Google Scholar
- Ciccimaro, D., Baker, W., Hamilton, I., Heikkila, L., Renick, J., MPRS (URBOT) Commercialization. Proceedings of SPIE Defence&Security Symposium, Orlando, FL, USA, April 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mesa-Robotics, MATILDA Robotic Platform. Retrieved May 11, 2007 from: http://www.mesa-robotics.com/matilda.htmlGoogle Scholar
- iRobot, Packbot. Retrieved May 11, 2007 from: http://www.irobot.com/sp.cfm?pageid=109Google Scholar
- Silverman, D., Interpreting Qualitative Data, SAGE Publications, London, Great Britain, pp. 291, 2006.Google Scholar
- Lundberg, C., Reinhold, R., Christensen, H. I., Evaluation of robot deployment in live missions with the military, police, and fire brigade. Proceedings of SPIE Defence&Security Symposium, Orlando, FL, USA, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Assessment of man-portable robots for law enforcement agencies
Recommendations
Integrated security infrastructures for law enforcement agencies
This paper provides an overview of the security architecture for Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs) designed by the INDECT project, and in particular the security infrastructures that have been deployed so far. These security infrastructures can be ...
Law Enforcement Agencies' activities in the cloud environment: a European legal perspective
The paper aims at discussing some major issues in relation to the complex and highly debated relationship between Cloud Service Providers ‘CSPs’ and government agency responsible for the enforcement of the laws Law Enforcement Agencies – ‘LEAs’. Our ...
Collision risk assessment and automatic obstacle avoidance strategy for teleoperation robots
Highlights- Collision risk models take into account distance, speed and some indirect factors.
AbstractTeleoperation robots have been paid more attention in aerospace, medical domain, and other fields because of their high precision and maneuverability. However, the working environments in these fields are characterized by danger or ...
Comments