skip to main content
10.1145/1660877.1660887acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespermisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessment of man-portable robots for law enforcement agencies

Published:28 August 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

This project has involved testing a Packbot Scout within a SWAT-unit for five months. This was done to explore the tactical benefits of the system and to test the robot's technical performance with end users. Another objective was to compare earlier results -- obtained by investigating military during training -- with results from deployment during true risk. The SWAT-team, equipped with and trained to use the robot, set a standard to bring it with them on regular missions. Using the robot during negotiation proved to be the most beneficial application. Other uses would be for long-term surveillances and deploying non-lethal weapons. Early results indicate that the Stockholm SWAT-unit, consisting of 80 active officers, could deploy the robot at least 20 times a year.

References

  1. Lundberg, C., Forthcoming: Assessment and evaluation of robots for dismounted high risk workers in urban settings, PhD Dissertation Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, October 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Birchall, P., The Longest Walk: The World of Bomb Disposal. London: Arms&Armour, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Schneider, F., European Land-Robot Trial (ELROB), FGAN, Hammelburg, Germany. Retrived Febuary 1, 2007 from: http://www.melrob.eu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carroll, D., Nguyen, C., Everett, H. R., and Frederick, B., Development and Testing for Physical Security Robots, SPIE Proc. 5804: Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, Orlando, FL, USA, March 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Barnes, M., Everett, H. R., and P. Rudakevych, ThrowBot: Design Considerations for a Man-Portable Throwable Robot, SPIE Proc. 5804: Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, Orlando, FL, USA, March 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ebert, K. A. and B. V. Stratton, Supporting the Joint Warfighter by Development, Training and Fielding of Man-Portable UGVs, SPIE Proc. 5804: Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, Orlando, FL, March 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. SPAWAR System Center San Diego, Man-Portable Robotic System, Retrieved March 7, 2007 from: http://www.nosc.mil/robots/land/mprs/mprs.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. U.S. Army, Future Combat System. Retrieved May 11, 2007 from: http://www.army.mil/fcs/sugv.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Department of Defense,. Report to congress: Development and Utilization of Robotics and Unmanned Ground Vehicles, USA. October 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ashley, J., FCS Update. Unmanned Systems, Vol 24, Nr 2, pp. 17--23, Mars/Apr 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith Detection, Smiths Supplies Lightweight Chemical Detector to Advanced CRBN Detection Robot, Retrieved February 5, 2007 from: http://www.smithsdetection.com/PressRelease.asp?autonum=114Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster-Miller, Inc., TALON Robots, Retrieved February 5, 2007 from: http://www.foster-miller.com/lemming.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner, C. W., Treado, P. J., Jochem, T. M., Gilbert, G. R., Demonstration of a Robot-based Raman Spectroscopic Detector for the Identification of CBE Threat Agents, Proceedings of 25th Army Science Conference, Orlando, USA, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. ROBOTIC FX, NEGOTIATOR, Tactical Surveillance Robot. Retrieved May 11, 2007 from: http://www.roboticfx.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy, R. R., Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, special issue on Human-Robot Interaction, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp: 125--137, May 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hisanori, A., Present Status and Problems of Fire Fighting Robots, Proceedings of Society of Instrument and Control Engineers Annual Conference, Osaka, Japan, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Matsuno, F., Tadokoro, S., Rescue Robots and Systems in Japan. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Shenyang, China, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Scholtz, J., Young, J., Drury, J. L., and Yanco, H. A., Evaluation of human-robot interaction awareness in search and rescue. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, New Orleans, USA, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yanco, H. Drury, J., and Scholtz, J., Beyond Usability Evaluation: Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction at a Major Robotics Competition, Human-Computer Interaction Journal, No 1, January 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. White, J., Harvey, H., Farnstrom, K., Testing of mobile surveillance robot at a nuclear power plant. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, NC, USA, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., Sakamoto, K., Tanie, K., Robot assisted activity at a health service facility for the aged for 17 months: an interim report of long-term experiment. Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, Nagoya, Japan, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Huttenrauch, H., Eklundh, K. S., Fetch-and-carry with CERO: observations from a long-term user study with a service robot. In Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Berlin, Germany, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Tomatis, N., Terrien, G., Piguet, R., Burnier, D., Bouabdallah, S. Arras, K. O., Siegwart, R., "Designing a secure and robust mobile interacting robot for the long term. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Leger, P. C., Trebi-Ollennu, A., Wright, J. R., Maxwell, S. A., Bonitz, R. G., Biesiadecki, J. J., Hartman, F. R., Cooper, B. K., Baumgartner, E. T., Maimone, M. W., Mars Exploration Rover surface operations: driving spirit at Gusev Crater. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumagai, J., Techno Cops - police robotic and electronic technology, Spectrum, IEEE, Vol 39, Issue 12, pp. 34--39, Dec 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Scheible, S., Robot helps end standoff: SWAT team uses new technology in arrest of Hingham man suspected of assault. Retrieved May 11, 2007 from: http://www.patriotledger.com/articles/2007/04/02/news/news01.txtGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Metacafe, Video: Robots Making Police Jobs Safer. Retrieved May 11, 2007 from: http://www.metacafe.com/watch/399031/robots_making_police_jobs_safer/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones, H. L., Rock S. M., Burns D.,&Morris, S., Autonomous robots in SWAT applications: Research, design, and operations challenges. In Proceedings of AUVSI International Conference on Unmanned Vehicles, Orlando, FL, USA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Nguyen, H., Bott, J., Robotics for Law Enforcement: Applications Beyond Explosive Ordnance Disposal, SPIE Proc. 4232: Technologies for Law Enforcement, Boston, MA, USA, November 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ciccimaro, D., Baker, W., Hamilton, I., Heikkila, L., Renick, J., MPRS (URBOT) Commercialization. Proceedings of SPIE Defence&Security Symposium, Orlando, FL, USA, April 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Mesa-Robotics, MATILDA Robotic Platform. Retrieved May 11, 2007 from: http://www.mesa-robotics.com/matilda.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. iRobot, Packbot. Retrieved May 11, 2007 from: http://www.irobot.com/sp.cfm?pageid=109Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Silverman, D., Interpreting Qualitative Data, SAGE Publications, London, Great Britain, pp. 291, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Lundberg, C., Reinhold, R., Christensen, H. I., Evaluation of robot deployment in live missions with the military, police, and fire brigade. Proceedings of SPIE Defence&Security Symposium, Orlando, FL, USA, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Assessment of man-portable robots for law enforcement agencies

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PerMIS '07: Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems
        August 2007
        293 pages
        ISBN:9781595938541
        DOI:10.1145/1660877

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 August 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader