skip to main content
10.1145/1631144.1631148acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tweet the debates: understanding community annotation of uncollected sources

Published:23 October 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We investigate the practice of sharing short messages (microblogging) around live media events. Our focus is on Twitter and its usage during the 2008 Presidential Debates. We find that analysis of Twitter usage patterns around this media event can yield significant insights into the semantic structure and content of the media object. Specifically, we find that the level of Twitter activity serves as a predictor of changes in topics in the media event. Further we find that conversational cues can identify the key players in the media object and that the content of the Twitter posts can somewhat reflect the topics of discussion in the media object, but are mostly evaluative, in that they express the poster's reaction to the media. The key contribution of this work is an analysis of the practice of microblogging live events and the core metrics that can leveraged to evaluate and analyze this activity. Finally, we offer suggestions on how our model of segmentation and node identification could apply towards any live, real-time arbitrary event.

References

  1. S. Ahern, M. Naaman, R. Nair, and J. H.-I. Yang. World explorer: visualizing aggregate data from unstructured text in geo-referenced collections. In JCDL '07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, pages 1--10, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. The 3rd annual workshop on weblogging ecosystem: Aggregation, analysis, and dynamics. 15th world wide web conference, May 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Bonacich. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1):113--120, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. P. Cesar, D. C. Bulterman, D. Geerts, J. Jansen, H. Knoche, and W. Seager. Enhancing social sharing of videos: fragment, annotate, enrich, and share. In MM '08: Proceeding of the 16th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 11--20, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. CSPAN. Cspan debate hub. http://debatehub.c-span.org/index.php/debate-1/, 2008. Accessed July 2, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. CSPAN. First 2008 presidential debate (full video). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F--nNIEduEOw, September 2008. Accessed July 2, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Current TV. http://www.current.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Current TV: Hack the Debate. http://current.com/topics/88834922_hack-the-debate/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Flickr. http://www.flickr.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. E. Gilbert and K. Karahalios. Predicting tie strength with social media. In CHI '09: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 211--220, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Granovetter. The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6):1360, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H. Hotelling. Simplified calculation of principal components. Psychometrika, 1(1):27--35, 1936.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07: Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis, pages 56--65, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. B. Krishnamurthy, P. Gill, and M. Arlitt. A few chirps about twitter. In WOSP '08: Proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks, pages 19--24, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Newton's method. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_method. Accessed July 2, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. G. Salton, A. Wong, and C. S. Yang. A vector space model for automatic indexing. Communcations of the ACM, 18:613--620, 1975. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. A. Shamma and Y. Liu. Social Interactive Television: Immersive Shared Experiences and Perspectives, chapter Zync with Me: Synchronized Sharing of Video through Instant Messaging, pages 273--288. Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA, USA, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. D. A. Shamma, R. Shaw, P. L. Shafton, and Y. Liu. Watch what i watch: using community activity to understand content. In MIR '07: Proceedings of the international workshop on Workshop on multimedia information retrieval, pages 275--284, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. X. Shi, B. Tseng, and L. Adamic. Looking at the blogosphere topology through different lenses. Ann Arbor, 1001:48109, May 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. Spinuzzi. Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Mit Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Twitter. http://www.twitter.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social Network Analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. D. Williams, M. F. Ursu, P. Cesar, K. Bergström, I. Kegel, and J. Meenowa. An emergent role for tv in social communication. In EuroITV '09: Proceedings of the seventh european conference on European interactive television conference, pages 19--28, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. L. Wu, X.-S. Hua, N. Yu, W.-Y. Ma, and S. Li. Flickr distance. In MM '08: Proceeding of the 16th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 31--40, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. You Tube. http://www.youtube.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Tweet the debates: understanding community annotation of uncollected sources

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  WSM '09: Proceedings of the first SIGMM workshop on Social media
                  October 2009
                  104 pages
                  ISBN:9781605587592
                  DOI:10.1145/1631144
                  • General Chairs:
                  • Susanne Boll,
                  • Steven C.H. Hoi,
                  • Jiebo Luo,
                  • Program Chairs:
                  • Rong Jin,
                  • Irwin King,
                  • Dong Xu

                  Copyright © 2009 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 23 October 2009

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article

                  Upcoming Conference

                  MM '24
                  MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
                  October 28 - November 1, 2024
                  Melbourne , VIC , Australia

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader