skip to main content
10.1145/1566374.1566376acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the complexity of nash dynamics and sink equilibria

Published:06 July 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Studying Nash dynamics is an important approach for analyzing the outcome of games with repeated selfish behavior of self-interested agents. Sink equilibria has been introduced by Goemans, Mirrokni, and Vetta for studying social cost on Nash dynamics over pure strategies in games. However, they do not address the complexity of sink equilibria in these games. Recently, Fabrikant and Papadimitriou initiated the study of the complexity of Nash dynamics in two classes of games. In order to completely understand the complexity of Nash dynamics in a variety of games, we study the following three questions for various games: (i) given a state in game, can we verify if this state is in a sink equilibrium or not? (ii) given an instance of a game, can we verify if there exists any sink equilibrium other than pure Nash equilibria? and (iii) given an instance of a game, can we verify if there exists a pure Nash equilibrium (i.e, a sink equilibrium with one state)?

In this paper, we almost answer all of the above questions for a variety of classes of games with succinct representation, including anonymous games, player-specific and weighted congestion games, valid-utility games, and two-sided market games. In particular, for most of these problems, we show that (i) it is PSPACE-hard to verify if a given state is in a sink equilibrium, (ii) it is NP-hard to verify if there exists a pure Nash equilibrium in the game or not, (iii) it is PSPACE-hard to verify if there exists any sink equilibrium other than pure Nash equilibria. To solve these problems, we illustrate general techniques that could be used to answer similar questions in other classes of games.

References

  1. H. Ackermann, H. Röglin, and B. Vöcking. Pure Nash equilibria in player-specific and weighted congestion games. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE), pages 50--61, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Heiner Ackermann and Alexander Skopalik. On the complexity of pure Nash equilibria in player-specific network congestion games. In Proceedings of 3nd International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE), pages 419--430, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Felix Brandt, Felix A. Fischer, and Markus Holzer. Symmetries and the complexity of pure nash equilibrium. In Wolfgang Thomas and Pascal Weil, editors, STACS, volume 4393 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 212--223. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Xi Chen and Xiaotie Deng. Settling the complexity of two-player nash equilibrium. In FOCS, pages 261--272, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Xi Chen, Xiaotie Deng, and Shang-Hua Teng. Computing nash equilibria: Approximation and smoothed complexity. In FOCS, pages 603--612, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Daskalakis and C.H. Papadimitriou. Computing equilibria in anonymous games. In IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Daskalakis and C.H. Papadimitriou. On the exhaustive algorithm for nash equilibria. page Unpublished Manuscript, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Constantinos Daskalakis, Paul W. Goldberg, and Christos H. Papadimitriou. The complexity of computing a nash equilibrium. In STOC, pages 71--78, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Juliane Dunkel and Andreas S. Schulz. On the complexity of pure-strategy Nash equilibria in congestion and local-effect games. In Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE), pages 62--73, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Fabrikant, C. Papadimitriou, and K. Talwar. On the complexity of pure equilibria. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pages 604--612, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Alex Fabrikant and Christos H. Papadimitriou. The complexity of game dynamics: Bgp oscillations, sink equilibria, and beyond. In SODA '08: Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, pages 844--853, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2008. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. L. Fleischer, M. Goemans, V.S. Mirrokni, and M. Sviridenko. Tight approximation algorithms for maximum general assignment problems. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 611--620, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Gale and L. Shapley. College admissions and the stability of marriage. American Mathematical Monthly, 69:9--15, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Goemans, L. Li, V.S. Mirrokni, and M. Thottan. Market sharing games applied to content distribution in ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), pages 1020--1033, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Goemans, V.S. Mirrokni, and A. Vetta. Sink equilibria and convergence. In FOCS, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Albert Xin Jiang and Kevin Leyton-Brown. Computing pure nash equilibria in symmetric Action-Graph Games. In Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 79--85, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. F. Kojima and Ü. Unver. Random paths to pairwise stability in many-to-many matching problems: a study on market equilibration. International Journal of Game Theory, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. I. Milchtaich. Congestion games with player-specific payoff functions. Games and Economics Behavior, 13:111--124, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. R.W. Rosenthal. A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria. International Journal of Game Theory, 2:65--67, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A.E. Roth and J.H. Vande Vate. Random paths to stability in two-sided matching. Econometrica, 58(6):1475--1480, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Alexander Skopalik and Berthold Vöcking. Inapproximability of pure Nash equilibria. In STOC '08: Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 355--364, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. Vetta. Nash equilibria in competitive societies, with applications to facility location, traffic routing and auctions. In 43rd Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 416--425, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On the complexity of nash dynamics and sink equilibria

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EC '09: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Electronic commerce
      July 2009
      376 pages
      ISBN:9781605584584
      DOI:10.1145/1566374
      • General Chair:
      • John Chuang,
      • Program Chairs:
      • Lance Fortnow,
      • Pearl Pu

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 July 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate664of2,389submissions,28%

      Upcoming Conference

      EC '24
      The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
      July 8 - 11, 2024
      New Haven , CT , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader