skip to main content
10.1145/1409635.1409656acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using wearable sensors and real time inference to understand human recall of routine activities

Published:21 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Users' ability to accurately recall frequent, habitual activities is fundamental to a number of disciplines, from health sciences to machine learning. However, few, if any, studies exist that have assessed optimal sampling strategies for in situ self-reports. In addition, few technologies exist that facilitate benchmarking self-report accuracy for routine activities. We report on a study investigating the effect of sampling frequency of self-reports of two routine activities (sitting and walking) on recall accuracy and annoyance. We used a novel wearable sensor platform that runs a real time activity inference engine to collect in situ ground truth. Our results suggest that a sampling frequency of five to eight times per day may yield an optimal balance of recall and annoyance. Additionally, requesting self-reports at regular, predetermined times increases accuracy while minimizing perceived annoyance since it allows participants to anticipate these requests. We discuss our results and their implications for future studies.

References

  1. Adams, S. A., Matthews, C. E., Ebbeling, C. B., Moore, C. G., Cunningham, J. E., Fulton, J. and Herbert, J. R. The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity. American Journal of Epidemiology, 161, 4, (2005), 389--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ainsworth, B. E., Sternfeld, B., Slattery, M. L., Dagulsé, V. and Zahrn, S. H. Physical activity and breast cancer: Evaluation of physical activity assessment methods. Cancer, 83, 3S, (1998), 611--620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Alevizos, A., Lentzas, J., Kokkoris, S., Mariolis, A. and Korantzopoulos, P. Physical activity and stroke risk. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 59, 8, (2005), 922--930.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. American College of Sports Medicine American College of Sports Medicine position stand: Osteoporosis and exercise. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 27, 4, (1995), i--vii.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop, C. M. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, New York, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Blair, S. N. and Connelly, J. C. How much physical activity should we do? The case for moderate amounts and intensities of physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 2, (1996), 193--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Consolvo, S. and Walker, M. Using the Experience Sampling Method to Evaluate Ubicomp Applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing Magazine: The Human Experience, 2, 2, (2003), 24--31 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Larson, R. Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 9, (1987), 526--536.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Durante, R. and Ainsworth, B. E. The recall of physical activity: Using a cognitive model of the question-answering process. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 28, 10, (1996), 1282--1291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Froehlich, J., Chen, M. Y., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., & Landay, J. A. MyExperience: A system for in situ tracing and capturing of user feedback on mobile phones. In Proc MobiSys '07, (2007), 57--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hakim, A. A., Curb, J. D., Petrovitch, H., Rodriguez, B. L., Yano, K., Ross, G. W., White, L. R. and Abbott, R. D. Effects of walking on coronary heart disease in elderly men: The Honolulu Heart Program. Circulation, 100, 1, (1999), 9--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hektner, J. M. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. The experience sampling method: Measuring the context and content of lives. In Bechtel, R. B. and Churchman, A. eds. Handbook of environmental psychology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2002, 233--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Helmrich, S. P., Ragland, D. R., W., L. R. and Paffenbarger, R. S., Jr. Physical activity and reduced occurrence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New England Journal of Medicine, 325, 3, (1991), 147--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Intille, S. S., Rondoni, J., Kukla, C., Ancona, I., and Bao, L. Context-aware experience sampling tool. In Proc CHI 2003, (2003), 972--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lee, I.-M. and Skerrett, P. J. Physical activity and all-cuase mortality: What is the dose-response relationship? Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 33, 6, Suppl., (2001), S549--471.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lester, J. Choudhury, T., & Borriello, G. A practical approach to recognizing physical activities. Proc Pervasive '06, (2006), 1--16 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Livingstone, M. B. E., Robson, P. J., Wallace, J. M. W. and McKinley, M. C. How active are we? Levels of physical activity in children and adults. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 62, (2003), 681--701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Paffenbarger, R. S., Jr., Wing, A. L., Hyde, R. T. and Jung, D. L. Physical activity and incidence of hypertension in college alumni. American Journal of Epidemiology, 117, 3, (1983), 245--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Sallis, J. F. and Saelens, B. E. Assessment of physical activity by self-report: Status, limitations, and future directions. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 2, (2000), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Salmon, P. Effects of physical exercise on anxiety, depression, and sensitivity to stress: A unifying theory. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 1, (2000), 33--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Shephard, R. J. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 37, (2003), 197--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Wheeler, L. and Reis, H. T. Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. Journal of Personality, 59, 3, (1991), 339--354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    UbiComp '08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing
    September 2008
    404 pages
    ISBN:9781605581361
    DOI:10.1145/1409635

    Copyright © 2008 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 21 September 2008

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader