skip to main content
10.1145/1397735.1397737acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Do social networks improve e-commerce?: a study on social marketplaces

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 August 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social networks have made a significant impact on how Internet users communicate, search for and share data today. Numerous proposals have been made to improve existing distributed systems by leveraging the inherent trust built into social links. For example, many believe that by augmenting online marketplaces with social networking, we can improve trust between transaction partners and increase user satisfaction. In this paper, we perform a detailed study of Overstock Auctions, an auction site that has recently integrated social links into user profiles. Using data on connections between roughly 400,000 Overstock users, we evaluate the impact of social connections on business transactions. Our results show that while the majority of users do not engage in social networking, those who transact with friends from their social network generally obtain significant benefits in the form of higher user satisfaction.

References

  1. AHN, Y.-Y., HAN, S., KWAK, H., MOON, S., AND JEONG, H. Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services. In Proc. of World Wide Web (Banff, Canada, 2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. AMARAL, L. A. N., SCALA, A., BARTHELEMY, M., AND STANLEY, H. E. Classes of small-world networks. In Proc. of National Academy of Sciences (2000), pp. 11149--11152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BHATTACHARJEE, R., AND GOEL, A. Avoiding ballot stuffing in ebay-like reputation systems. In Proc. of P2PEcon (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. DOMINGOS, P. Mining social networks for viral marketing. IEEE Intelligent Systems 20, 1 (2005), 80--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. DONATH, J., AND BOYD, D. Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal 22, 4 (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. DOUCEUR, J. R. The Sybil attack. In Proc. of IPTPS (March 2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. GRANOVETTER, M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, 3 (November 1985), 481--510.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. HOGG, T., AND ADAMIC, L. Enhancing reputation mechanisms via online social networks. In Proc. of ACM Conference on Electronic commerce (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. JENSEN, C., DAVIS, J., AND FARNHAM, S. Finding others online: reputation systems for social online spaces. In Proc. of CHI (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. KALI, R. Social embeddedness and economic governance: A small world approach. Tech. rep., University of Arkansas, November 2003. http://ssrn.com/abstract=462560 .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. KUMAR, R., NOVAK, J., AND TOMKINS, A. Structure and evolution of online social networks. In Proc. of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. LIAN, Q., ZHANG, Z., YANG, M., ZHAO, B. Y., DAI, Y., AND LI, X. An empirical study of collusion behavior in the maze p2p file-sharing system. In Proc. of ICDCS (June 2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. MILGRAM, S. The small world problem. Psychology Today 6 (1967), 62--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. MISLOVE, A., GUMMADI, K. P., AND DRUSCHEL, P. Exploiting social networks for internet search. In Proc. of HotNets (Nov. 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. MISLOVE, A., MARCON, M., GUMMADI, K. P., DRUSCHEL, P., AND BHATTACHARJEE, B. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In Proc. of IMC (Oct 2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. RICHARDSON, M., AND DOMINGOS, P. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In Proc. of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. TONG, Q. Embeddedness of social networks in formal organizational structures. In Meeting of the American Sociological Association (Atlanta, GA, August 2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. YU, H., KAMINSKY, M., GIBBONS, P. B., AND FLAXMAN, A. Sybilguard: Defending against sybil attacks via social networks. In Proc. of SIGCOMM (Pisa, Italy, September 2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Do social networks improve e-commerce?: a study on social marketplaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WOSN '08: Proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks
      August 2008
      92 pages
      ISBN:9781605581828
      DOI:10.1145/1397735

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 August 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate12of36submissions,33%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader