skip to main content
10.1145/1363686.1363714acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Data sharing vs. message passing: synergy or incompatibility?: an implementation-driven case study

Published:16 March 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

One reasonable categorization of coordination models is into data sharing or message passing, based on whether the information necessary to coordination is persistently stored and shared, or instead is only transiently available during communication. Generally speaking, approaches based on data sharing are more expressive and provide full decoupling in space and time. The alternative approach requires the simultaneous presence of the coordinated parties, but is typically more scalable. Prominent examples are, respectively, tuple spaces and publish-subscribe.

An open research question is whether it is possible to exploit in synergy the best of these two approaches, e.g. by implementing the more complex data sharing coordination on top of the more lightweight message passing one. In this paper, we seek an answer to this question in a pragmatic way: we analyze an implementation of the Lime tuple space middleware on top of REDS, an open source publish-subscribe system. Our implementation-driven style of investigation forces us to face details that do not surface when reasoning in the abstract about the nature and expressiveness of the models. We report about lessons we learned in this experience, and propose an extension to the publish-subscribe model that, albeit useful per se, constitutes a more effective foundation for data sharing coordination models.

References

  1. I. M. Arntzen and D. Johansen. A stateful and open publish-subscribe structure for online marketplalces. In Proc. of the 25th Int. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems Wkshp.s, pages 431--437. IEEE Computer Society, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Busi and G. Zavattaro. Publish/subscribe vs. shared dataspace coordination infrastructures. In Proc. of 10th IEEE Int. Wkshp.s on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE), pages 328--333. IEEE Press, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Carzaniga, D. S. Rosenblum, and A. L. Wolf. Design and evaluation of a wide-area event notification service. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 19(3):332--383, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. K. M. Chandy and L. Lamport. Distributed snapshots: determining global states of distributed systems. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 3(1):63--75, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. Cugola and G. P. Picco. REDS: a reconfigurable dispatching system. In Proc. of the 6th Int. Wkshp. on Software engineering and middleware (SEM), pages 9--16, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. J. Demers, J. Gehrke, M. Hong, M. Riedewald, and W. M. White. Towards expressive publish/subscribe systems. In Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Extending Database Technology (EDBT), pages 627--644, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. T. Eugster, P. A. Felber, R. Guerraoui, and A.-M. Kermarrec. The many faces of publish/subscribe. ACM Comput. Surv., 35(2):114--131, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. Fidler, H.-A. Jacobsen, G. Li, and S. Mankovski. The PADRES distributed publish/subscribe system. In Int. Conf. on Feature Interactions in Telecommunications and Software Systems, pages 12--30, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Gelernter. Generative communication in Linda. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 7(1):80--112, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Heimbigner. Adapting publish/subscribe middleware to achieve Gnutella-like functionality. In Proc. of the 2001 ACM Symp. on Applied computing (SAC), pages 176--181, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G. Mühl, L. Fiege, and P. R. Pietzuch. Distributed Event-Based Systems. Springer, Aug. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. L. Murphy, G. P. Picco, and G.-C. Roman. Lime: A coordination model and middleware supporting mobility of hosts and agents. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 15(3):279--328, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. G. A. Papadopoulos and F. Arbab. Coordination models and languages. Advances in Computers, 46:330--401, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Spezialetti and P. Kearns. Efficient distributed snapshots. In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pages 382--388, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Data sharing vs. message passing: synergy or incompatibility?: an implementation-driven case study

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SAC '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing
          March 2008
          2586 pages
          ISBN:9781595937537
          DOI:10.1145/1363686

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 March 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader