skip to main content
research-article

The Field Evaluation of a Mobile Digital Image Communication Application Designed for People with Aphasia

Published:01 May 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

PhotoTalk is an application for a mobile device that allows people with aphasia to capture and manage digital photographs to support face-to-face communication. Unlike any other augmentative and alternative communication device for people with aphasia, PhotoTalk focuses solely on image capture and organization and is designed to be used independently. Our project used a streamlined process with three phases: (1) a rapid participatory design and development phase with two speech-language pathologists acting as representative users, (2) an informal usability study with five aphasic participants, which caught usability problems and provided preliminary feedback on the usefulness of PhotoTalk, and (3) a one-month field evaluation with two aphasic participants followed by a one-month secondary field evaluation with one aphasic participant, which showed that they all used it regularly and relatively independently, although not always for its intended communicative purpose. Our field evaluations demonstrated PhotoTalk's promise in terms of its usability and usefulness in everyday communication.

References

  1. Allen, M., Leung, R., McGrenere, J., and Purves, B. 2008. Involving domain experts in assistive technology research. In Universal Access in the Information Society, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Allen, M., McGrenere, J., and Purves, B. 2007. The design and field evaluation of PhotoTalk: a digital image communication application for people with aphasia. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ACM, New York, pp. 187--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Aphasia Project. 2007. Aphasia Project. http://www.cs.ubc.ca/projects/Aphasia/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. AphasiaHelp.Org. Aphasia and dysphasia. http://www.aphasiahelp.org/information/aphasia/11_aphasiadysphasia/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyd-Graber, J., Nikolova, S., Moffatt, K., Kin, K., Lee, J., Mackey, L., Tremaine, M., and Klawe, M. 2006. Participatory design with proxies: Developing a desktop-PDA system to support people with aphasia. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, pp. 151--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cohene, T., Baecker, R., and Marziali, E. 2005. Designing interactive life story multimedia for a family affected by Alzheimer's disease: A case study. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, pp. 1300--1303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Daeman, E., Dadlani, P., Du, J., Li, Y., Erik-Paker, P., Martens, J., and De Ruyter, B. 2007. Designing a free style, indirect, and interactive storytelling application for people with aphasia. INTERACT, 221--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Davies, R. 2004. The ethnographically informed participatory design of a PDA application to support communication. Masters thesis, University of British Columbia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies, R., Marcella, S., McGrenere, J., and Purves, B. 2004. The ethnographically informed participatory design of a PD application to support communication. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ACM, New York, pp. 153--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dawe, M. 2006. Desperately seeking simplicity: How young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technologies. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, pp. 1143--1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dynavox Technologies. http://www.dynavoxtech.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Garrett, K. and Kimelman, M. 2000. AAC and aphasia: Cognitive-linguistic considerations. In Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Adults with Acquired Neurologic Disorders, Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore, MD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gus Communications. Gus! Multimedia Speech System. http://www.gusinc.com/speechsystem.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hux, K., Manasse, N., Weiss, A., and Beukelman, D. R. 2001. Augmentative and alternative communication for persons with aphasia. Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia. R. Chapey, Ed. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 675--687.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kertesz, A. 1982. The Western Aphasia Battery. Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lasker, J. P. and Bedrosian, J. L. 2000. Acceptance of AAC by adults with acquired disorders. Augmentative Communication for Adults with Neurogenic and Neuromuscular Disabilities, D. R. Beukelman, K. M. Yorkston and J. Reichle, Eds. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore, MD, pp. 107--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Light, J. 1988. Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, Taylor & Francis, pp. 66--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lingraphicare Inc. Lingraphica. http://www.aphasia.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lumsden, J., Leung, R., and Fritz, J. 2005. Designing a mobile transcriber application for adult literacy education: A case study. In Proceedings of IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning 2005. ACM, New York, pp. 16--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., Purves, B., and Klawe, M. 2004. The participatory design of a sound and image enhanced daily planner for people with aphasia. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, pp. 407--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. National Aphasia Association. Aphasia: The Facts. http://www.aphasia.org/naa_materials/aphasia_facts.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. OneWrite Company. Cyrano Communicator - An Augmentative and Alternative Communication Device. http://www.cyranocommunicator.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Paul, D. R., Frattali, C. M., Holland, A. L., Thompson, C. K., Caperton, C. J., and Slater, S. C. 2004. Quality of Communication Life Scale. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, MD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rostron, A., Ward, S., and Plant, R. 1996. Computerised augmentative communication devices for people with dysphasia: design and evaluation. Europ. J. Disord. Communicat. 31, 1, 11--30, England.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Thorburn, L., Newhoff, M., and Rubin, S. S. 1995. Ability of subjects with aphasia to visually analyze written language, pantomime, and iconographic symbols. Amer. J. Speech-Lang. Path. 4, 4, 174--179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. van de Sandt-Koenderman, M., Wiegers, J., and Hardy, P. 2005. A computerised communication aid for people with aphasia. Disabil. Rehab. 27, 9, 529--533.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Waller, A., Dennis, F., Brodie, J., and Cairns, A. Y. 1998. Evaluating the use of TalksBac, a predictive communication device for nonfluent adults with aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 33, 1, England 45--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu, M., Richards, B., and Baecker, R. 2004. Participatory design with individuals who have amnesia. In Proceedings of the 8th conference on Participatory Design, ACM, New York, pp. 214--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Field Evaluation of a Mobile Digital Image Communication Application Designed for People with Aphasia

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
              ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 1, Issue 1
              May 2008
              124 pages
              ISSN:1936-7228
              EISSN:1936-7236
              DOI:10.1145/1361203
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 2008 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 May 2008
              • Accepted: 1 April 2008
              • Revised: 1 March 2008
              • Received: 1 October 2007
              Published in taccess Volume 1, Issue 1

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader