skip to main content
article

FILA in gameland, a holistic approach to a problem of many dimensions

Published:01 October 2006Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Multiplayer online games have now become popular with millions across the globe, capturing the attention of both researchers and practitioners. Unfortunately, online games still have to deal with the limitations imposed by some unresolved issues. Interactivity, consistency, fairness, and scalability are the major requirements that need to be addressed efficiently in order to provide an appealing product to a huge number of potential customers worldwide. To answer this demand, we describe a holistic approach that can exploit the semantics of the game to satisfy the aforementioned requirements. We provide extensive and comparative results that demonstrate how our scheme copes efficiently with an elevated level of game traffic.

References

  1. Armitage, G. 2003. An experimental estimation of latency sensitivity in Multiplayer Quake 3. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON 2003, Sydney, Australia). 137-141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Borella, M. S. 2000. Source models for network game traffic. Comput. Commun. 23, 4 (2000), 403-410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cronin, E., Kurc, A. R., Filstrup, B., and Jamin, S. 2004. An efficient synchronization mechanism for mirrored game architectures. Multimedia Tools Appl. 23, 1 (2004), 7-30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Early MUD History. http://www.ludd.luth.se/mud/aber/mud-history.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Farber, J. 2002. Network game traffic modelling. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Network and System Support for Games (NetGames2002, Braunschweig, Germany). ACM, New York. 53-57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ferretti, S. and Roccetti, M. 2004. A novel obsolescence-based approach to event delivery synchronization in multiplayer games. Int. J. Intell. Games Simul. 3, 1 (2004), 7-19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferretti, S., Palazzi, C. E., Roccetti, M., Gerla, M., and Pau, G. 2006. Buscar el Levante por el Poniente: In search of fairness through interactivity in massively multiplayer online games. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Networking Issues in Multimedia Entertainment (NIME'06, CCNC, Las Vegas, NV, Jan.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fitzek, F., Schulte, G., and Reisslein, M. 2002. System architecture for billing of multiplayer games in a wireless environment using GSM/UMTS and WLAN services. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Network and System Support for Games (NetGames2002, Braunschweig, Germany). ACM, New York, 58-64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Floyd, S. and Jacobson, V. 1993. Random early detection gateways for congestion avoidance. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 1, 4 (1993), 397-413. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gautier, L. and Diot, C. 1998. Design and evaluation of MiMaze, a multiplayer game on the Internet. In Proceedings of IEEE Multimedia (ICMCS'98, Austin, TX). 233-236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jehaes, T., De Vleeschauwer, D., Coppens, T., Van Doorselaer, B., Deckers, E., Naudts, W., Spruyt, K., and Smets, R. 2003. Access network delay in networked games. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Network and System Support for Games (NetGames 2003, Redwood City, CA). ACM, New York, 63-71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kim, S., Kuester, F., and Kim, K. H. 2005. A global timestamp-Bbased Aapproach to Enhanced data consistency and fairness in collaborative virtual environments. Multimedia Syst. 10, 3 (2005), 220-229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mauve, M., Vogel, J., Hilt, V., and Effelsberg, W. 2004. Local-lag and timewarp: Providing consistency for replicated continuous applications. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 6, 1 (2004), 47-57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mills, D. L. 1991. Internet time synchronization: The network time protocol. IEEE Trans. Commun. 39, 10 (1991), 1482-1493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. MMOGCHART.COM. http://www.mmogchart.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Palazzi, C. E., Ferretti, S., Cacciaguerra, S., and Roccetti, M. 2004. On maintaining interactivity in event delivery: Synchronization for mirrored game architectures. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Workshop on Networking Issues in Multimedia Entertainment (NIME'04, GLOBECOM 2004. Dallas, TX). 157-165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Palazzi, C. E., Ferretti, S., Cacciaguerra, S., and Roccetti, M. 2005. A RIO-like technique for interactivity loss avoidance in fast-paced multiplayer online games. ACM J. Comput. Entertainment 3, 2 (2005), 1-11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Palazzi, C. E., Ferretti, S., Cacciaguerra, S., and Roccetti, M. Interactivity-loss avoidance in event delivery synchronization for mirrored game architectures. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 8, 4, (2006), 874-879. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pantel, L. and Wolf, L. C. 2002. On the impact of delay on real-time multiplayer games. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video (Miami, FL). 23-29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Park, K. and Willinger, W. 2000. Self-Similar Network Traffic and Performance Evaluation. 1st ed. Wiley-Interscience. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Quake Forge Project. http://www.quakeforge.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramanathan, P., Shin, K. G., and Butler, R. W. 1990. Fault tolerant clock synchronization in distributed systems. IEEE Computer 23, 10 (1990), 33-42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sheldon, N., Girard, E., Borg, S., Claypool, M., and Agu, E. 2003. The effect of latency on user performance in Warcraft III. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Network and System Support for Games (NetGames 2003, Redwood City, CA). ACM, New York. 3-14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Steinman, J. S. 1995. Scalable parallel and distributed military simulations using the SPEEDES framework. In Proceedings of the 2nd Electronic Simulation Conference (ELECSIM95).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Zander, S., Leeder, I., and Armitage, G. 2005. Achieving fairness in multiplayer network games through automated latency balancing. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE 2005, Valencia, Spain). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Zander, S. and Armitage, G. 2004. Empirically measuring the QoS sensitivity of interactive online game players. In Proceedings of Australian Telecommunications Networks & Applications Conference (ATNAC2004, Sydney, Australia). 511-518.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. FILA in gameland, a holistic approach to a problem of many dimensions

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format