skip to main content
10.1145/1125451.1125693acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Usability of interaction patterns

Published:21 April 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interaction patterns are becoming an important method for bridging the gap between analysis and design in user-centered design. Recent studies, however, have indicated problems in their usability. Our overall research goal is to improve the usability of interaction patterns. In the first part of the research -- discussed in this paper -- we have empirically evaluated the usability of interaction patterns and outline proposals for improvements.

References

  1. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I. and Angel, S. A Pattern Language: Towns, Building, Constructions. Oxford University Press (1977), New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Deng, J., Kemp, E., Todd, E.G., Managing UI Pattern Collections. ACM International Conference Proc. Series, Vol. 94 (2005), 31--38.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jokela, T. The KESSU Usability Design Process Model. Version 2.1. Oulu University (2004). http://www.tol.oulu.fi/~tjokela/KESSUUDProcessModel2.1.pdf]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Seffah, A. & Javahery, H. On the Usability of Usability Patterns: "What can make patterns usable for common developers". Chi 2002-workshop. (2002). http://www.welie.com/patterns/chi2002-workshop/Seffah_chi2002.pdf]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Shalloway A. & Trott, J.R. Design Patterns Explained: A new perspective on Object-Oriented Design. 1st ed. Addison-Wesley Professional (2001).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Tidwell, J. Common Ground: A Pattern Language for Human-Computer Interface Design. (1999). http://www.mit.edu/~jtidwell/interaction_patterns.html]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Welie, M.v. Patterns in Interaction Design. http://www.welie.com/index.html]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Welie, M.v., Veer, G.C.v.d. Pattern Languages in Interaction Design: Structure and Organization. Vrije Universiteit, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Computer Science. Published at Interact (2003). http://www.welie.com/papers/Welie-Interact2003.pdf]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Welie, M.v. Task-Based User Interface Design. SIKS Dissertation Series No. 6., 72, (2001)93--99. http://www.cs.vu.nl/~martijn/gta/docs/Welie-PhD-Thesis.pdf]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yin, R. K. Case study research. Design and methods. 3rd ed. Applied Social Methods Series, Vol.5. Sage Publications Inc. (2003).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Usability of interaction patterns

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '06: CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2006
      1914 pages
      ISBN:1595932984
      DOI:10.1145/1125451

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader