skip to main content
article

MANET simulation studies: the incredibles

Published:01 October 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Simulation is the research tool of choice for a majority of the mobile ad hoc network (MANET) community. However, while the use of simulation has increased, the credibility of the simulation results has decreased. To determine the state of MANET simulation studies, we surveyed the 2000-2005 proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). From our survey, we found significant shortfalls. We present the results of our survey in this paper. We then summarize common simulation study pitfalls found in our survey. Finally, we discuss the tools available that aid the development of rigorous simulation studies. We offer these results to the community with the hope of improving the credibility of MANET simulation-based studies.

References

  1. R. Bagrodia and M. Takai. Position paper on validation of network simulation models. Computer Science Department of University of California, Los Angeles, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. O. Balci. Validation, verification, and testing techniques throughout the lifecycle of a simulation study. In Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Winter Simulation, pages 215--220, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. O. Balci. Verification, validation and accreditation of simulation models. In Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Winter Simulation, pages 135--141, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Barton. Design of experiments: designing simulation experiments. In Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Winter Simulation, pages 47--52, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J.-Y. Le Boudec and M. Vojnovic. Perfect simulation and stationarity of a class of mobility models. In Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Symposium on Simulation, pages 72--79, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Brakmo and L. Peterson. Experiences with network simulation. In Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems (SIGMETRICS), pages 80--90, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Briesemeister and G. Hommel. Role-based multicast in highly mobile but sparsely connected ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), pages 45--50, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. Dyer and R. Boppana. A comparison of TCP performance over three routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (Mobi-Hoc), pages 56--66, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Association for Computing Machinery. The ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). URL: http://www.sigmobile.org/mobihoc. Page accessed on April 23, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D. Goldsman and G. Tokol. Output analysis: output analysis procedures for computer simulations. In Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Winter Simulation, pages 39--45, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Akaroa Research Group. Akaroa2. URL: http://www.tkn.tu-berlin.de/research/ns2_akaroa-2/ns.html. Page accessed on April 21, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. The VINT Group. Ns-users mailing list. http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/nsusers. Page accessed on April 23, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Heidemann, S. Kumar, and K. Mills. Expanding confidence in network simulations. IEEE Network, September/October:58--63, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. X. Hong, M. Gerla, G. Pei, and C. Chiang. A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM), pages 53--60, August 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. Hu and D. Johnson. Implicit source routes for on-demand ad hoc network routing. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), pages 1--10, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Johnson and D. Maltz. Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In Mobile Computing, pages 153--181. 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. S. Kurkowski, T. Camp, and M. Colagrosso. A visualization and animation tool for NS-2 wireless simulations: iNSpect. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Law and W. Kelton. Simulation modeling and analysis. McGraw-Hill, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. P. L'Ecuyer and R. Simard. On the performance of birthday spacing tests for certain families of random number generators. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, pages 131--137, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Lee and C. Kim. Neighbor supporting ad hoc multicast routing protocol. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), pages 37--44, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Liu, L. F. Perrone, Y. Yuan, and D. Nicol. The simulator for wireless ad hoc networks (SWAN). URL: http://www.eg.bucknell.edu/swan/. Page accessed on August 19, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Tommaso Melodia, Dario Pompili, Vehbi C. Gungor, and Ian F. Akyildiz. A distributed coordination framework for wireless sensor and actor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing (MobiHoc), pages 99--110, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Midkiff. Simulation: Methodology. Presentation to ECE590 class. URL: http://fiddle.visc.vt.edu/courses/ece5984net2/lectures/09_sim.pdf. Page accessed on April 15, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. D. Montgomery. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. E. Mota, A. Wolisz, and K. Pawlikowski. Experience with Akaroa: speeding up stochastic simulation using parallel replications. In Proceedings of the High Performance Computing and Advanced Simulation Technologies Conference, pages 296--301, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. W. Navidi and T. Camp. Stationary distributions for the random waypoint mobility model. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, pages 99--108, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. The NS manual: formerly known as notes and documentation, 2003. URL: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/. Page accessed on April 21, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. K. Pawlikowski. Do not trust all simulation studies of telecommunications networks. International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), pages 899--908, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. K. Pawlikowski, J. Jeong, and R. Lee. On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, pages 132--139, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. K. Pawlikowski, J. Jeong, and R. Lee. Letters to the editor. IEEE Communications Magazine, pages 132--139, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. K. Pawlikowski and V. Yau. Akaroa-2 Manual, 1995. Department of Computer Science, University of Canterbury, ChristChurch New Zealand. URL: http://www.tkn.tu-berlin.de/research/ns2_akaroa-2. Page accessed on April 21, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. G. Pei, M. Gerla, X. Hong, and C. Chiang. A wireless hierarchical routing protocol with group mobility. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pages 1538--1542, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. L. F. Perrone, Y. Yuan, and D. Nicol. Modeling and simulation best practices for wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Winter Simulation, pages 685--693, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. The CMU Monarch Project. The CMU monarch extensions to the ns simulator. URL: http://www.monarch.cs.cmu.edu/. Page accessed on April 25, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. The SEACORN Project. SEACORN simulation tools. URL: http://seacorn.ptinovacao.pt/sim_tools.html. Page accessed on April 23, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. E. Royer, P. M. Melliar-Smith, and L. Moser. An analysis of the optimum node density for ad hoc mobile networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pages 857--861, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. N. Sadagopan, F. Bai, B. Kishuamachori, and A. Helmy. PATHS analysis of path duration statistics and their impact on reactive manet routing protocols. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), pages 245--256, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. S. Sanchez. Output modeling: abc's of output analysis. In Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Winter Simulation, pages 30--38, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. R. Sargent. Verification, validation, and accreditation of simulation models. In Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Winter Simulation, pages 50--59, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. L. Schruben. Detecting initialization bias in simulation output. Operations Research, pages 569--590, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. R. Zheng, J. Hou, and L. Sha. Asynchronous wakeup for ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (Mobi-Hoc), pages 35--45, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. MANET simulation studies: the incredibles

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review
            ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review  Volume 9, Issue 4
            Special Issue on Medium Access and Call Admission Control Algorithms for Next Generation Wireless Networks.
            October 2005
            61 pages
            ISSN:1559-1662
            EISSN:1931-1222
            DOI:10.1145/1096166
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2005 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 October 2005

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader