skip to main content
10.1145/1014052.1014129acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Clustering moving objects

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 August 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Due to the advances in positioning technologies, the real time information of moving objects becomes increasingly available, which has posed new challenges to the database research. As a long-standing technique to identify overall distribution patterns in data, clustering has achieved brilliant successes in analyzing static datasets. In this paper, we study the problem of clustering moving objects, which could catch interesting pattern changes during the motion process and provide better insight into the essence of the mobile data points. In order to catch the spatial-temporal regularities of moving objects and handle large amounts of data, micro-clustering [20] is employed. Efficient techniques are proposed to keep the moving micro-clusters geographically small. Important events such as the collisions among moving micro-clusters are also identified. In this way, high quality moving micro-clusters are dynamically maintained, which leads to fast and competitive clustering result at any given time instance. We validate our approaches with a through experimental evaluation, where orders of magnitude improvement on running time is observed over normal K-Means clustering method [14].

References

  1. M. Ankerst, M. Breunig, H. P. Kriegel, and J. Sander. OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure. SIGMOD, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Agrawal, J. Gehrke, D. Gunopulos, and P. Raghavan. Automatic subspace clustering of high dimensional data for data mining applications. SIGMOD, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Bash, L. J. Guibas, and J. Hershberger. Data structures for mobile data. Journal of Algorithms, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Bash, L. J. Guibas, and G. D. Ramkumar. Sweeping lines and line segments with a heap. SoCG, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Chudova, S. Gaffney, E. Mjolsness, and P. Smyth. Translation-invariant mixture models for curve clustering. SIGKDD, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. D. da Fonseca and C. M. H. de Figueiredo. Kinetic heap-ordered trees: tight analysis and improved algorithms. Information Processing Letters, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Gersho and R. M. Gray. Vector quantization and signal compression. Kluwer Academic, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Guha, R. Rastogi, and K. Shim. CURE: an efficient clustering algorithm for large databases. SIGMOD, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Har-Peled. Clustering motion. FOCS, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. S. Iwerks, H. Samet, and K. Smith. Continuous k-nearest neighbor queries for continuously moving points with updates. VLDB, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. K. Jain, M. N. Murty, and P. J. Flynn. Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput. Surv., 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Karypis, E. H. Han, and V. Kumar. CHAMELEON: a hierarchical clustering algorithm using dynamic modeling. COMPUTER, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Library for Efficient Data types and Algorithms. <http://www.algorithmic-solutions.com/enleda.htm>.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. MacQueen. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proc. 5th Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Ng and J. Han. Efficient and effective clustering method for spatial data mining. VLDB, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Saltenis, C. S. Jensen, S. T. Leutenegger, and M. A. Lopez. Indexing the positions of continuously moving objects. SIGMOD, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Y. Tao and D. Papadias. Time-parameterized queries in spatial-temporal databases. SIGMOD, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. W. Wang, J. Yang, and R. Muntz. STING: a statistical information grid approach to spatial data mining. VLDB, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. O. Wolfson, P. A. Sistla, S. Chamberlain, and Y. Yesha. Updating and querying databases that track mobile units. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. T. Zhang, R. Ramakrishnan, and M. Livny. BIRCH: an efficient data clustering method for very large databases. SIGMOD, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Clustering moving objects

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '04: Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      August 2004
      874 pages
      ISBN:1581138881
      DOI:10.1145/1014052

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 August 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader