skip to main content
10.1145/800141.804678acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Some connections between nonuniform and uniform complexity classes

Published:28 April 1980Publication History

ABSTRACT

It is well known that every set in P has small circuits [13]. Adleman [1] has recently proved the stronger result that every set accepted in polynomial time by a randomized Turing machine has small circuits. Both these results are typical of the known relationships between uniform and nonuniform complexity bounds. They obtain a nonuniform upper bound as a consequence of a uniform upper bound.

The central theme here is an attempt to explore the converse direction. That is, we wish to understand when nonuniform upper bounds can be used to obtain uniform upper bounds.

In this section we will define our basic notion of nonuniform complexity. Then we will show how to relate it to more common notions.

References

  1. 1.L. Adleman, “Two Theorems on Random Polynomial Time,” Proc. 19th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 75–83 (1978).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.R. Aleliunas, R.M. Karp, R.J. Lipton, L. Lovasz C. Rackoff, “Random Walks, Universal Sequences, and the Complexity of Maze Problems,” Proc. 20th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, (1979).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.A.K. Chandra and L.J. Stockmeyer, “Alternation,” Proc. 17th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, (1976).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.S.A. Cook, “The Complexity of Theorem-Proving Procedures,” Proc. 3rd ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, pp. 151–158 (1971). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.S. Fortune, “A Note on Sparse Complete Sets,” SIAM J. Computing 8, pp. 431–433 (1979).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.J. Hartmanis and L. Berman, “On Isomorphisms and Density of NP and Other Complete Sets,” Proc. 8th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, pp, 30–40 (1976). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.R.M. Karp, “Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems,” in Complexity of Computer Computations (R.E. Miller and J.W. Thatcher, eds.), Plenum, New York (1972).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.D. Kozen, “On Parallelism in Turing Machines,” Proc. IEEE Symp. Foundations of Computer Science, (1976).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.A.R. Meyer and M.S. Paterson, “With What Frequency are Apparently Intractable Problems Difficult”, M.I.T. Tech. Report, Feb. 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.A.R. Meyer and L.J. Stockmeyer, “The Equivalence Problem for Regular Expressions with Squaring Requires Exponential Space,” Proc. 13th IEEE Symp. on Switching and Automata Theory, pp. }25;}29 (1972).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.N. Pippenger, “On Simultaneous Resource Bounds,” Proc. 20th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, (}979) Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.D.A. Plaisted, “New NP-hard and NP-complete Polynomial and Integer Divisibility Problems,” Proc. 18th IEEE Symp. FOCS, pp. 241–253 (1977).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.S.E. Savage, “Computational Work and Time on Finite Machines,” JACM 19, (4), pp. 660–674 (1972). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.T.S. Schaefer, “On the Complexity of Some Two-Person Perfect-Information Games,” JCSS 16, pp. }85–225 (1978).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.C.P. Schnorr, “Optimal Algorithms for Self-Reducible Problems, 3rd Int. Coll. on Automata, Lang. and Programming, Edinburgh (1976).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.L.J. Stockmeyer, “The Polynomial-Time Heirarchy”, Theoretical Computer Science 3, p. 1–22 (1977).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.L.G. Valiant, “Relative Complexity of Checking and Evaluating, U. of Leeds Tech. Report, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.L.G. Valiant, “The Complexity of Computing the Permanent,” TCS, (1979)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Some connections between nonuniform and uniform complexity classes

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          STOC '80: Proceedings of the twelfth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
          April 1980
          446 pages
          ISBN:0897910176
          DOI:10.1145/800141

          Copyright © 1980 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 April 1980

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          STOC '80 Paper Acceptance Rate47of125submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

          Upcoming Conference

          STOC '24
          56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
          June 24 - 28, 2024
          Vancouver , BC , Canada

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader