skip to main content
10.1145/2567948.2577013acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

iFeel: a system that compares and combines sentiment analysis methods

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sentiment analysis methods are used to detect polarity in thoughts and opinions of users in online social media. As businesses and companies are interested in knowing how social media users perceive their brands, sentiment analysis can help better evaluate their product and advertisement campaigns. In this paper, we present iFeel, a Web application that allows one to detect sentiments in any form of text including unstructured social media data. iFeel is free and gives access to seven existing sentiment analysis methods: SentiWordNet, Emoticons, PANAS-t, SASA, Happiness Index, SenticNet, and SentiStrength. With iFeel, users can also combine these methods and create a new Combined-Method that achieves high coverage and F-measure. iFeel provides a single platform to compare the strengths and weaknesses of various sentiment analysis methods with a user friendly interface such as file uploading, graphical visualizing, and weight tuning.

References

  1. Senticnet 2.0. http://sentic.net/downloads/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. M. Bradley and P. J. Lang. Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual, and affective ratings. Technical report, University of Florida, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Cambria, A. Hussain, C. Havasi, C. Eckl, and J. Munro. Towards crowd validation of the uk national health service. In ACM WebSci, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. Cambria, A. Livingstone, and A. Hussain. The hourglass of emotions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. E. Cambria, R. Speer, C. Havasi, and A. Hussain. Senticnet: A publicly available semantic resource for opinion mining. In AAAI Fall Symposium Series, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Cha, H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, and K. P. Gummadi. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. In ICWSM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. P. S. Dodds and C. M. Danforth. Measuring the happiness of large-scale written expression: songs, blogs, and presidents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(4):441--456, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Esuli and Sebastiani. Sentwordnet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In LREC, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Go, R. Bhayani, and L. Huang. Sentiment140. http://www.sentiment140.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Gonçalves, M. Araújo, F. Benevenuto, and M. Cha. Comparing and combining sentiment analysis methods. In COSN, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Goncalves, F. Benevenuto, and M. Cha. Panas-t: A pychometric scale for measuring sentiments on twitter. CoRR, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. X. Hu, L. Tang, J. Tang, and H. Liu. Exploiting social relations for sentiment analysis in microblogging. In WSDM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. R. Tausczik and J. W. Pennebaker. The psychological meaning of words: Liwc and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1):24--54, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Thelwall. Heart and soul: Sentiment strength detection in the social web with sentistrength, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, C. Cai, and A. Kappas. Sentistrength. http://www.sentiment140.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. H. Wang, D. Can, A. Kazemzadeh, F. Bar, and S. Narayanan. A system for real-time Twitter sentiment analysis of 2012 U.S. presidential election cycle. In ACL, pages 115--120, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Watson and L. Clark. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the panas scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1):1063--1070, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. T. Wilson, P. Hoffmann, S. Somasundaran, J. Kessler, J. Wiebe, Y. Choi, C. Cardie, E. Riloff, and S. Patwardhan. Opinionfinder: a system for subjectivity analysis. In EMNLP, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. iFeel: a system that compares and combines sentiment analysis methods

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WWW '14 Companion: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web
          April 2014
          1396 pages
          ISBN:9781450327459
          DOI:10.1145/2567948

          Copyright © 2014 Copyright is held by the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2).

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 April 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • demonstration

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader