Randal S. Olson
ABSTRACT
Animal grouping behaviors have been widely studied due to their implications for understanding social intelligence, collective cognition, and potential applications in engineering, artificial intelligence, and robotics. An important biological aspect of these studies is discerning which selection pressures favor the evolution of grouping behavior. The selfish herd hypothesis states that concentrated groups arise because prey selfishly attempt to place their conspecifics between themselves and the predator, thus causing an endless cycle of movement toward the center of the group. Using an evolutionary model of a predator-prey system, we show that the predator attack mode plays a critical role in the evolution of the selfish herd. Following this discovery, we show that density-dependent predation provides an abstraction of Hamilton's original formulation of "domains of danger." Finally, we verify that density-dependent predation provides a sufficient selective advantage for prey to evolve the selfish herd in response to predation by coevolving predators. Thus, our work verifies Hamilton's selfish herd hypothesis in a digital evolutionary model, refines the assumptions of the selfish herd hypothesis, and generalizes the domain of danger concept to density-dependent predation.
- I.D. Couzin. Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends Cogn. Sci., 13:36--43, 2009.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C.K. Hemelrijk and H. Hildenbrandt. Some causes of the variable shape of flocks of birds. PLoS ONE, 6:e22479, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F.C. Dyer. The biology of the dance language. Annu. Rev. of Entomol., 47:917--49, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Hall-Stoodley, J.W. Costerton, and P. Stoodley. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Micro., 2:95--108, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Kersten, R.H. Britton, P.J. Dugan, and H. Hafner. Flock feeding and food intake in Little Egrets: the effects of prey distribution and behaviour. J. Anim. Ecol., 60:241--252, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Ballerini et al. Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. P. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 105:1232--7, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J.K. Parrish. Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. Science, 284:99, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Krause and G.D. Ruxton. Living in groups. Oxford University Press, USA, 2002.Google Scholar
- B. Yuval, J.W. Wekesa, and R.K. Washino. Effect of body size on swarming behavior and mating success of male Anopheles freeborni (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Insect Behav., 6:333--342, 1993.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R.H. Pulliam and T. Caraco. Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, editors, Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Sinauer, Mass., 2nd edition, 1984.Google Scholar
- M. Treisman. Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion. Anim. Behav., 23:779--800, 1975.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W.D. Hamilton. Geometry for the selfish herd. J. Theor. Bio., 31:295--311, 1971.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B.R.C. Bertram. In J. R. Krebs and N.B. Davies, editors, Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, pages 64--96. Blackwell, Oxford, 1978.Google Scholar
- J.M. Jeschke and R. Tollrian. Prey swarming: which predators become confused and why? Anim. Behav., 74:387--393, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Beauchamp. Reduced flocking by birds on islands with relaxed predation. P. Roy. Soc. B, 271:1039--42, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. James, P.G. Bennett, and J. Krause. Geometry for mutualistic and selfish herds: the limited domain of danger. J. Theoret. Biol., 228:107--13, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Beauchamp. Vigilance in a selfish herd. Anim. Behav., 73:445--451, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L.J. Morrell, G.D. Ruxton, and R. James. Spatial positioning in the selfish herd. Behav. Ecol., 22:16--22, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J.L. Quinn and W. Cresswell. Testing domains of danger in the selfish herd: Sparrowhawks target widely spaced redshanks in flocks. P. Roy. Soc. B, 273:2521--6, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S.V. Viscido, M. Millery, and D.S. Wetheywz. The dilemma of the selfish herd: the search for a realistic movement rule. J. Theor. Bio., 217:183--194, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T.L. Morton, J.W. Haefner, V. Nugala, R.D. Decino, and L. Mendes. The selfish herd revisited: do simple movement rules reduce relative predation risk? J. Theor. Bio., 167:73--79, 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A.J. Wood and G.J. Ackland. Evolving the selfish herd: emergence of distinct aggregating strategies in an individual-based model. P. Roy. Soc. B, 274:1637--42, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C.R. Tosh. Which conditions promote negative density dependent selection on prey aggregations? J. Theor. Bio., 281:24--30, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R.S. Olson et al. Predator confusion is sufficient to evolve swarming behavior. arXiv e-print. http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.3330.Google Scholar
- L. Spector, J. Klein, C. Perry, and M. Feinstein. Emergence of collective behavior in evolving populations of flying agents. In Proceedings GECCO '03, pages 61--73, Berlin, 2003. Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C.R. Ward, F. Gobet, and G. Kendall. Evolving collective behavior in an artificial ecology. In Artificial Life, volume 7, pages 191--209, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Poli. Analysis of the publications on the applications of particle swarm optimisation. J. Artif. Evol. Appl., 2008:4:1--4:10, 2008. Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Xue, M. Zhang, and W.N. Browne. Multi-objective particle swarm optimisation (PSO) for feature selection. In Proceedings GECCO '12, pages 81--88, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Vellasques, R. Sabourin, and E. Granger. Gaussian mixture modeling for dynamic particle swarm optimization of recurrent problems. In Proceedings GECCO '12, pages 73--80, New York, NY, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Marinakis and M. Marinaki. A honey bees mating optimization algorithm for the open vehicle routing problem. In Proceedings GECCO '11, pages 101--108, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Silva, A. Neves, and E. Costa. An empirical comparison of particle swarm and predator prey optimisation. In Proceedings AICS '02, pages 103--110, London, UK, 2002. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Şahin. Swarm robotics: from sources of inspiration to domains of application. In Proceedings SAB '04, pages 10--20, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J.A. Edlund, N. Chaumont, A. Hintze, C. Koch, G. Tononi, and C. Adami. Integrated information increases with fitness in the evolution of animats. PLoS Comput. Biol., 7:e1002236, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D.E. Goldberg. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 1st edition, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G.R. Martin. The eye of a passeriform bird, the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): eye movement amplitude, visual fields and schematic optics. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 159:545--557, 1986.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P.A.P. Moran. The statistical processes of evolutionary theory. Clarendon Press, 1962.Google Scholar
- C. Huepe and M. Aldana. New tools for characterizing swarming systems: a comparison of minimal models. Physica A, 387:2809--2822, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R.E. Lenski, C. Ofria, R.T. Pennock, and C. Adami. The evolutionary origin of complex features. Nature, 423:139--44, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Critical interplay between density-dependent predation and evolution of the selfish herd
Recommendations
Evolution of swarming behavior is shaped by how predators attack
Animal grouping behaviors have been widely studied due to their implications for understanding social intelligence, collective cognition, and potential applications in engineering, artificial intelligence, and robotics. An important biological aspect of ...
Individual Competition and the Emergence of Density-Dependent Exposure to Predation: How Behaviors Influence Population Processes
Resource competition acts at both the individual and the population levels. Stable dynamics result in a persistent system whereas unstable dynamics can result in extinction. This study explores how localized competition between individuals, over ...
Comments