skip to main content
research-article

High reliability virtual organizations: Co-adaptive technology and organizational structures in tsunami warning systems

Published:30 December 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Highly reliable organizations (HROs) are those organizations, which by nature or design, cannot or must not fail; the consequences of failure in such systems are usually catastrophic. Systems that combine the characteristics of highly reliable operations and distributed, virtual organizations are known as highly reliable virtual organizations (HRVOs)—distributed and electronically linked groups of organizations that excel in high-consequence settings. Tsunami warning systems (TWS) are one example of virtual organizations that operate under enormous expectations for reliability. Adaptive structuration theory suggests that, in complex systems, technology and organizational structures co-evolve, and users adapt technology to their needs, creating shared meaning about the role and utility of technology in various settings. In this article, we consider how the shared meaning that develops in the social shaping of technology in one HRVO, tsunami warning systems, contributes to reliability enhancement. Following Poole and DeSanctis [2000], this study is a structuration study in a particular context, exploring how structuration occurs, the conditions that influence it, and its consequences or outcomes. We begin by describing HRVOs and the co-adaptive roles that technology and organizational structures play in such organizations. We then describe a global tsunami warning system as an illustrative case of a globally distributed sociotechnical system for which use of technology and distributed organizational structures should enhance reliability. We describe how social media plays a role in adaptive structuration in tsunami warning systems, and then return to consider the nature of HRVOs and their characteristics, en route to identifying challenges in the co-adaptation of technology and organizational structures in highly reliable tsunami warning systems.

References

  1. Adeyemi, O. S., Shryock, S. G., Sankaran, S., Hostad, O., and Gontijo, J. 2008. Implementing i-Field Initiatives in a Deepwater Greenfield, Offshore Nigeria. In Proceedings of the Society for Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 21--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahuja, M. K. and Carley, K. M. 1998. Network structures in virtual organizations. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 3, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bangalore Aviation. 2011. From fear to cautious optimism: Indian aviation review 2010, trends for 2011. http://www.bangaloreaviation.com/2011/01/from-fear-to-cautious-optimism-indian.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrionuevo, A. and Robbins, L. 2010. 1.5 Million Displaced after Chile Earthquake. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/28/world/americas/28chile.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayerl, P. S. and Lauche, K. 2008. Coordinating high-Interdependency tasks in asymmetric distributed teams. In Proceedings of the ACM Computer-Supported Cooperative Work Conference (CSCW). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bearman, C., Paletz, S. B. F., Orasanu, J., and Thomas, M. J. W. 2010. The breakdown of coordinated decision-making in distributed systems. Human Factors: J. Human Factors Ergonomics Soc. 52, 2,173--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Benjamin, R. and Wigand, R. 1995. Electronic markets and virtual value chains on the information superhighway. Sloan Manage. 36, 62--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Benkoil, D. 2011. How social media, Internet changed experience of Japan disaster. MediaShift. 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger, M. 1996. Making the virtual office a reality. Sales Market. Manage. SMT Supplement. 18--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bigley, G. A. and Roberts, K. H. 2001. The incident command system: High reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Manage. J. 46, 6, 1281--1299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Blackburn, B. 2011. Japan earthquake and tsunami drive social media dialogue. ABCNews OnLine (3/11/11). http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/japan-earthquake-tsunami-drive-social-media-dialogue/story?id=13117677.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Blackmon, D. A., O'Connell, V., Berzon, A., and Campoy, A. 2010. There was nobody in charge. WSJOnLine (5/27/10). www.wsjonline.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Broach, D. M. and Dollar, C. S. 2002. Relationship of employee attitudes and supervisor controller ratio to en route operational error rate. Rep. DOT/FAA/AM-02/9. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine. http://www.hf.faa.gov/docs/508/docs/cami/0209.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Carmel, E. 1999. Global Software Teams: Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Casselman, B. and Gold, R. 2010. BP decisions set stage for disaster. WSJOnLine (5/27/10). http://www. wsjonline.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chesbrough, H. W. and Teece, D. J. 1996. When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (Jan.-Feb.), 65--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Civil Air Navigation Services Organization (CANSO). 2005. CANSO members confirm ATM harmonisation. http://www.rlp.cz/generate_page.php?page_id=1013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Cross, R., Liedtka, J., and Weiss, L. 2005. A practical guide to social networks. Harvard Bus. Rev. (March), 124--135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Cummings, M. L. 2004. The need for command and control instant message adaptive interfaces: Lessons learned from tactical Tomahawk human-in-the-loop simulations. CyberPsycho. Behav. 7, 6, 653--661.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Cutchin, M. P. 2002. Virtual medical geographies: Conceptualizing telemedicine and regionalization. Progress Hum. Geog. 26,1, 19--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Denning, P. J. 2006. Hastily Formed Networks. Comm. ACM. 49, 4, 15--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. DeSanctis, G. and Monge, P. 1998. Communication processes for virtual organizations. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 3, 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M. S. 1994. Capturing the complexity of advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Org. Sci. 5, 2, May.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Durso, F. T. and Manning, C. A. 2008. Air traffic control. Rev. Hum. Factors Ergonomics. 4, 195--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Endsley, M. R. 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 37, 1, 32--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Eppinger, S. D. and Chitkara, A. R. 2006. The new practice of global product development. Sloan Manage. Rev. 47, 4, 22--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. ESRI. 2011. Japan earthquake and tsunami: Social media map. http://www.esri.com/services/disaster-response/japan-earthquake-tsunami-2011-map/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Evangelista, B. 2011. Google activates person finder for Japan quake, tsunami. San Francisco Chronicle Online (SFGate) (3/10/11). http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/techchron/detail?entry_id=84797.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Fackler, M. and Drew, K. 2011. Huge earthquake triggers tsunami off Japan's coast. New York Times (3/11/11). http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/12/world/asia/12japan.html?ref=global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Fields, R., Paterno, F., Santoro, C., and Tahmassebi, S. 1999. Comparing design options for allocating communication media in cooperative safety-critical contexts: A method and a case study.ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 6, 4, 370--398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Fimrite, P. 2011. Tsunami warning system is tested. San Francisco Chronicle (3/12/11). http://www.sfgate. com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2011%2F03%2F12%2FMNTK1I9ENA.DTL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Fulk, J. 1993. Social construction of communication technology. Acad. Manage. J. 36, 5, 921--950.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Gibbons, D. E. 2007. Maximizing the impact of disaster response by nonprofit organizations and volunteers. In Communicable Crises: Prevention, Response and Recovery in the Global Arena. D.E. Gibbons, Ed., Information Age Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Macmillan Publishing, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Giddens, A. 1993. New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretive Sociologies, 2nd edition. Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Gilson, R. D., Garland, D. J., and Koonce, J. M. Eds. 1994. Situation Awareness in Complex Systems. Daytona Beach, FL: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Glaser, M. 2010. California wildfire coverage by local media, blogs, twitter, maps and more. PBS MediaShift (10/25/10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Gold, R. and Casselman, B. 2010. On doomed rig‘s last day, a divisive change of plan. WSJOnline (8/26/10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Grabowski, M. R. 2010. Wet and dry tsunami warning systems: Lessons from high reliability organizations. J. Homeland Secur. Emerg. Manage. 7, 1, 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Grabowski, M. R., Ayyalasomayajula, P., Merrick, J. R., Harrald, J. H., and Roberts, K. H. 2007. Leading indicators of safety in virtual organizations. Safety Science, 45, 10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Grabowski, M. and Roberts, K. H. 1997. Risk mitigation in large scale systems: lessons from high reliability organizations. California Manage. Rev. 39, 152--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Grabowski, M. and Roberts, K. H. 1999. Risk mitigation in virtual organizations. Organiz. Sci. 10, 6, 704--721. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Gregg, C. E., Houghton, B. F., Paton, D., Johnston, D. M., Swanson, D. A., and Yanagi, B. S. 2007. Tsunami warnings: Understanding in Hawaii. Natural Hazards 40, 1, 71--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Gulbrandsoy, K., Hepso, V., and Skavhaug, A. 2002. Virtual collaboration in oil and gas organizations. ACM SIGGROUP Bull. 23, 3,42--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Hodge, N. 2010. Texts, tweets saving Haitians from the rubble. Wired.com (1/24/10). http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/tag/haiti/page/3/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Hughes, A. and Palen, L. 2009. Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Husdal.com. 2010. Using social media in a crisis. http://www.husdal.com/2010/04/21/using-social-media-in-a-crisis/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Air Navigation Bureau (ANB). 2011. The operational concept of air traffic management. http://www.icao.int/icao/en/anb/atm/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. International Tsunami Information Center (ITIC). 2009. Mw 8.0 Tsunami, Samoa Islands. http://ioc3.unesco. org/itic/contents.php?id=657.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. International Tsunami Information Center (ITIC). 2011. UNESCO-IOC: Strengthening tsunami warning and emergency responses: Training workshop on the development of end-to-end tsunami standard operating procedures (SOPs). International Oceanographic Commission, ITIC. Honolulu, HA. http://ioc3.unesco.org/itic/files/DetailedTOC_PI_final.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Jamieson, A. 2009. Chaos as transatlantic flights grounded by major air traffic control failure. The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/6257259/Chaos-as-transatlantic-flights-grounded-by-major-air-traffic-control-failure.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Jarvenpaa, S. L. and Leidner, D. E. 1999. Communication and trust in virtual teams. Organiz. Sci. 10, 6, 791--815. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Jones, J. A. 2011. Social media saves lives in japan. Speak Media Blog. 13 March. http://www.speakmediablog. com/2011/03/social-media-saves-lives-in-japan.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Keane, B. and Esper, P. 2005. Major incident and disaster management with particular reference to the recent South Asian tsunami disaster. EBI_Clarke Bond Group, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Kimble, C., Barlow, A., and Li, F. 2000. Effective virtual teams through communities of practice. Strathclyde Business School Management Science Working Paper No. 2000/9. http://ssrn.com/abstract=634645.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Kurkinen, K., Hakkinen, M., Sullivan, H., and Lauttamus, M. 2010. Optimizing mobile social media interfaces for rapid internal communication by emergency services. In Proceedings of the 7th Information Systems for Crisis and Disaster Management Conference (ISCRAM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. La Porte, T. R. and Consolini, P. 1991. Working in theory but not in practice: Theoretical challenges in high reliability organizations. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 1, 19--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Latonero, M. and Shklovski, I. 2010. Respectfully yours in safety and service: Emergency management and social media evangelism. In Proceedings of the 7th Information Systems for Crisis and Disaster Management Conference (ISCRAM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Leidner, D. E., Pan, G., and Pan, S. L. 2009. The role of information technology in crisis response: Lessons from the SARS and Asian Tsunami Disasters. J. Strategic Inform. Syst. 18, 80--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Li, J., Wilson, L., Stapleton, S., and Cregan, P. 2006. Design of an advanced telemedicine system for emergency care. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments (OZCHI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Little, R. G., Wallace, W. A., Birkland, T. A., and Herabat, P. 2007. Sociotechnological systems integration to support tsunami warning and evacuation. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Liu, S. B., Palen, L., Sutton, J., Hughes, A. L., and Vieweg, S. 2008. In search of the bigger picture: The emergent role of on-line photo sharing in times of disaster. In Proceedings of the 5th Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management Conference (ISCRAM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Lu, Y. and Yang, D. 2010. Information exchange in virtual communities under extreme disaster conditions. Decision Support Syst. 50, 2, 529--538. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Majchrzak, A., Jarvenpaa, S., and Hollingshead, A. B. 2007. Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organiz. Sci. 18, 1, 147--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., and Ba, S. 2000. Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. 24, 4, 569--600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Mallis, M. M., Banks, S. B., and Dinges, D. F. 2010. Aircrew fatigue, sleep need and circadian rhythmicity. In Human Factors in Aviation, 2nd Ed. E. Salas and D. E Maurino Eds., Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 401--437.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. McGinley, M., Turk, A., and Bennett, D. 2006. Design criteria for public emergency warning systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM), 13--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Mejdal, S., McCauley, M. E., and Beringer, D. B. 2001. Human factors design guidelines for multifunction displays. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aerospace Medicine. Rep. DOT/FAA/AM-01/1, http://www.hf.faa.gov/docs/508/docs/cami/0117.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Mendonca, D., Jefferson, T., and Harrald, J. 2007. Collaborative adhocracies and mix and match technologies in emergency management. Comm. ACM 50, 3, 45--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., and Castillo, B. 2010. Twitter under crisis: Can we trust what we RT? In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Social Media Analytics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Meserve, J. and Ahlers, M. M. 2009. Pilots landing at Seattle-Tacoma airport report lasers. CNN.com (2/24/09). http://edition.cnn.com/2009/US/02/23/washington.plane.lasers/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Mileti, D. S. and Sorenson, D. 1990. Communication of emergency public warnings: A social science perspective and state-of-the-art assessment. Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Oak Ridge, TN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Morone, J. G. and Woodhouse, E. J. 1986. Averting Catastrophe: Strategies for Regulating Risky Technologies. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23, 3, 242--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. National Academies. 2011. Tsunami Warning and Preparedness: An Assessment of the U.S. Tsunami Program and the Nation’s Preparedness Efforts. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2008a. 2004 Indonesian Sumatra Earthquake and Tsunami Web Link Compilation and Data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2008b. WC/ATWC User's Guide. West Coast/Alaska Tsunami Warning Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Palmer, AK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2008c. Operations, Systems, and Procedures Manual. Pacific Tsunami Warning Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Ewa Beach, HA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2010. A hectic weekend at the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center. AGU Blogosphere, American Geophysical Union. http://blogs.agu.org/geospace/2010/03/02/hectic_weekend_ptwc/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2011a. Pacific Tsunami Warning Center, Tsunami Bulletin #1. http://ptwc.weather.gov/ptwc/text.php?id=pacific.1011.03.11.055508.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2011b. Tsunami Advisory. #4 West Coast/Alaska Tsunami Warning Center. http://wcatwc.arh.noaa.gov/2011/03/11/lhvpd9/04/messagelhvpd9-04.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2011c. NOAA and Social Media. http://www.noaa. gov/socialmedia/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. National Research Council. 1997. Aviation Safety and Pilot Control: Understanding and Preventing Unfavorable Pilot-Vehicle Interactions. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. National Transportation Safety Board. 1996. Safety recommendations concerning the American Airlines 757 accident near Cali, Colombia. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Transportation Safety Board. Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Olson, G. M. and Olson, J. S. 2008. Groupware and computer-supported cooperative work. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, 2nd Ed. A. Sears and J. A. Jacko Eds., New York: Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Olson, G. M., Olson, J. S., and Venolia, G. 2009. What still matters about distance? In Proceedings of the Human-Computer Interaction Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Orlikowski, W. 1992. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organiz. Sci. 3, 3, 398--427.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Orlikowski, W. J. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organiz. Sci. 11, 4, 404--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Orton, J. D. and Weick, K. E. 1990. Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Acad. Manage. Rev. 15, 203--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Palen, L., Anderson, K. M., Mark, G., Martin, J., Sicker, D., Palmer, M., and Grunwald, D. 2010. A vision for technology-mediated support for public participation and assistance in mass emergencies and disasters. In Proceedings of the ACM-BCS Visions of Computer Science Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Palen, L. and Liu, S. 2007. Citizen communications in disaster: Anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 727--736. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Palen, L., Vieweg, S., Sutton, J., Liu, S. B., and Hughes, A. L. 2007. Crisis informatics: Studying crisis in a networked world. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on e-Social Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Palmer, J. W. and Speier, C. 1997. A typology of virtual organizations: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the Association for Information Systems Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Paul, D. L. 2006. Collaborative activities in virtual settings: A knowledge management perspective of telemedicine. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 22, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Paul, D. L. and McDaniel, R. R. 2004. A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. MIS Quart. 28, 2, 183--227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Pew Research Center. 2009. Adults on Social Network sites, 2005--2009. http://www.pewinternet.org/Infographics/Growth-in-Adult-SNS-Use-20052009.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Physicians Online/Medscape. 2010. www.medscape.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Poole, M. S. and DeSanctis, G. 1990. Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In Organizations and Communications Technology, J. Fulk and C. Steinfeld Eds., Sage Publishing, Newbury Park, CA, 173--191.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Poole, M. S. and DeSanctis, G. 2000. Methods for the study of structuration in information technology. In Proceedings of Organization Science Winter Meeting.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Roberts, K. H. 1990. Some characteristics of high reliability organizations. Organiz. Sci. 1, 160--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  102. Roberts. K. H. and Bea, R. 2001. Must accidents happen? Lessons from high reliability organizations. The Acad. Manage. Exec. 15, 3, 70--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Roberts, K. H. and Gargano, G. 1990. Managing a high reliability organization: A case for interdependence. In Managing Complexity in High Technology Organizations, M. A. Von Glinow and S. Morman, Eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 146--159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Roberts, K. H., Madsen, P., Desai, V., and Van Stralen, D. 2005. A case of the birth and death of a high reliability healthcare organization. Qual. Safety Health Care 14, 216--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. Robinson, W. and Robison, D. 2007. Tsunami mobilizations: Considering the role of mobile and digital communication devices, citizen journalism and mass media. In The Cell Phone Reader: Essays in Social Transformation. A. P. Kavoori and N. Arceneaux, Eds., Peter Lang Publishing, New York 85--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Rochlin, G. I., La Porte, T. L., and Roberts, K. H. 1987. The self designing high reliability organization: Aircraft carrier flight operations at sea. Naval War College Rev. 40, 76--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Roe, E. and Schulman, P. 2008. High Reliability Management: Operating on the Edge. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Rogers, D. M. 1996. The challenge of fifth generation R and D. Res. Technol. Manage. 39, 33--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  109. Ros, M. 2010. An analysis of social media during the recent Spanish air traffic controller's strike. AllPlane (12/4/10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Sagan, S. D. 1993. The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents and Nuclear Weapons. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. Salvendy, G. 1997. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Sarter, N. B. and Woods, D. D. 1991. Situation awareness: A critical but ill-defined phenomenon.Int. J. Aviation Psychol.1, 45--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  113. Shneiderman, B. 1992. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction 2nd Ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. Schulman, P. 1993. The analysis of high reliability organizations. In New Challenges to Understanding Organizations, K. H. Roberts, Ed., Macmillan, New York. 33--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Shiro, B. 2011. Social media, tsunamis and crisis management. http://www.slideshare..net/brianshiro/social-media-tsunamis-and-crisis-management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. Smith, S. L. and Mosier, J. N. 1986. Guidelines for designing interface software. Tech. rep. ESD-TR-86-278, Mitre Corporation. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.84.8930&rep= rep1&type=pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Social Media 4 Emergency Management.com. 2011. Japan's Earthquake and Tsunami On-Line Resource Guide. http://www.sm4em.org/2011/03/japan-earthquake-tsunami-resources/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications (SWIFT). www.swift.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. Starbird, K. and Palen, L. 2010. Pass it on? Retweeting in mass emergency. In Proceedings of the 7th International Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management Conference (ISCRAM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Sutton, J., Palen, L., and Shklovski, I. 2008. Backchannels on the front lines: Emergent uses of social media in the 2007 southern California wildfires. In Proceedings of the 5th International Information Systems for Crisis Management Conference (ISCRAM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Sutton, J. N. 2010. Twittering Tennessee: Distributed networks and collaboration following a technological disaster. In Proceedings of the 7th International Information Systems for Crisis Management Conference (ISCRAM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Synolakis, C. 2010. Waving the tsunami warning flag. Wall Street Journal (10/27/10). http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303362404575579542440609272.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. Telfer, D. 2011. Saving Lives through Social Media. New Media Strategies (5/2/11). http://nms.com/blog/post/saving-lives-through-social-media/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. Tenner. E. 1996. Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. Tucker, C. 2011. Social media, texting play new role in response to disasters: Preparedness, communication targeted.Nation's Health 41, 4, 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. Uhr, C. and Eckman, O. 2008. Trust among decision makers and its consequences to emergency response operations. J. Emergency Manage. 6, 3, 21--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  127. United States General Accounting Office (GAO). 2005. National AirSpace System: Experts' Views on Improving the U.S. Air Traffic Control Modernization Program. GAO-05-333SP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. United States Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System Program. 2007. Tsunami Warning Center Reference Guide. http://www.iotws.org/ev_en.php?ID=2893_201&ID2=DO_TOPIC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. Vanderhaegen, F. 1997. Multilevel organization design: The case of the air traffic control. Contr. Eng. Practice. 5, 3, 591--597.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  130. Vaughan, D. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. Vaughan, D. 2004. Organizational rituals of risk and error. In Organizational Encounters with Risk, Bridget Hutter and Michael Power, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. Vieweg, S., Hughes, A., Starbird, K., and Palen, L. 2010. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what Twitter may contribute to situational awareness. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  133. Vinas, M. J. 2010. A hectic weekend at the Pacific tsunami warning center. AGU Blogosphere. http://blogs.agu.org/geospace/2010/03/02/hectic_weekend_ptwc/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. Vogus, T. J. and Sutcliffe, K. M. 2007. The impact of safety organizing, trusted leadership, and care pathways on reported medication errors in hospital nursing units. Medical Care 45, 10, 997--1002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  135. Weick, K. E. 1987. Organization culture as a source of high reliability. Calif. Manage. Rev. 29, 116--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  136. Weick, K. E. 1990a. Technology as equivoque: Sensemaking in new technologies. In Technology and Organizations, P.S. Goodman, L.S. Sproull, Eds., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. Weick, K. E. 1990b. The vulnerable system: An analysis of the Tenerife air disaster. J. Manage. 16, 571--593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  138. Weick, K. E. 1993. The collapse of sense making in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster.Administrative Sci. Quart. 38, 628--652.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations.: Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. Weick, K. E. 1996. Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Administrative Sci. Quart. 41, 301--313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., and Obstfeld, D. 1999. Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. In Research in Organizational Behavior, B. Staw and R. Sutton, Eds., JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 81--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  142. Wickens, C. D., Mavor, A. S., Parasuraman, R., and McGee, J. P. 1998. The Future of Air Traffic Control: Human Operators and Automation. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  143. Wildavsky, A. 1988. Searching for Safety. Transactions Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. Williams, T. 2011. Official in charge of air traffic control resigns. New York Times (4/14/11). http://www. nytimes.com/2011/04/15/us/15tower.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  145. Yates, D. and Paquette, S. 2011. Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. Inter. J. Inform. Manage. 13, 6--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  146. YOUTUBE. 2011. Important: Pray for Japan. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dE1CRpowoWU.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. High reliability virtual organizations: Co-adaptive technology and organizational structures in tsunami warning systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader