Abstract
The pseudorapidity distribution of charged hadron over a wide \(\eta \) range gives us crucial information about the dynamics of particle production. The constraint by the detector acceptance, particularly at forward rapidities, demands a proper distribution function to extrapolate the pseudorapidity distribution to large \(\eta \). In this work, we have proposed a phenomenological model based on the Pearson statistical framework to study the pseudorapidity distribution. We have analyzed and fit data of charged hadrons produced in \(Pb-Pb\) collision at 2.76 TeV and \(Xe-Xe\) collision at 5.44 TeV using the proposed model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: This is a theoretical work and the experimental data used for this analysis are already published and referenced in the main text of the paper.]
References
J. Adam et al., ALICE. Phys. Lett. B 772, 567–577 (2017). arXiv:1612.08966 [nucl-ex]
J.X. Sun, C.X. Tian, E.Q. Wang, F.H. Liu, Chin. Phys. Lett. 30, 022501 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/30/2/022501
B.C. Li, Y.Z. Wang, F.H. Liu, X.J. Wen, Y.E. Dong, Phys. Rev. D 89(5)(2014), 054014. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.054014arXiv:1403.4025 [hep-ph]
G. Wolschin, EPL 95(6), 61001 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/95/61001 [arXiv:1106.3636 [hep-ph]]
L.N. Gao, F.H. Liu, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, 184713 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/184713 [arXiv:1509.08603 [nucl-ex]]
J. Cleymans, J. Phys. G 35, 044017 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/35/4/044017
F. Becattini, J. Cleymans, J. Phys. G 34, S959-964 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/34/8/S135arXiv:hep-ph/0701029 [hep-ph]
L. Marques, J. Cleymans, A. Deppman, Phys. Rev. D 91, 054025, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.054025 [arXiv:1501.00953 [hep-ph]]
Y. Gao, H. Zheng, L.L. Zhu, A. Bonasera, Eur. Phys. J. A 53(10), 197 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12397-yarXiv:1706.03693 [nucl-th]
J. Q. Tao, M. Wang, H. Zheng, W. C. Zhang, L. L. Zhu , A. Bonasera, [arXiv:2011.05026 [nucl-th]]
S. Jena, R. Gupta, Phys. Lett. B 807, 135551, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135551
R. Gupta, A. Menon , S. Jena, [arXiv:2012.08124 [hep-ph]]
E. Abbas et al., ALICE. Phys. Lett. B 726, 610–622 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.09.022arXiv:1304.0347 [nucl-ex]
J. Adam et al., ALICE. Phys. Lett. B 754, 373–385 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12.082arXiv:1509.07299 [nucl-ex].
S. Acharya et al., ALICE. Phys. Lett. B 790, 35–48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.048arXiv:1805.04432 [nucl-ex]
K. Pearson, Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London a: mathematical. Phys Eng Sci 186, 343 (1895)
J.H. Pollard, Numerical and Statistical Techniques (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979)
R. Gupta, S. Jain , S. Jena, [arXiv:2103.11185 [hep-ph]]
C. Tsallis, Possible generalization of Boltzmann–Gibbs statistics. J. Statist. Phys. 52, 479 (1988)
B. Abelev et al., ALICE. Phys. Lett. B 720, 52–62 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.01.051arXiv:1208.2711 [hep-ex]
S. Acharya et al., ALICE. Phys. Lett. B 788, 166–179 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.052arXiv:1805.04399 [nucl-ex]
R. Brun , F. Rademakers 1997 ROOT - An Object Oriented Data Analysis Framework,Nucl. Instrum.Meth. A38981. See also ”ROOT [software], Release v6.08.06, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.848819
F. James, M. Roos, Minuit: a system for function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and correlations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 10, 343–367 (1975)
Acknowledgements
R. Gupta would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by CSIR through fellowship number 09/947 (0067) 2015-EMR-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Tamas Biro.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, R., Katariya, A.S. & Jena, S. A unified formalism to study the pseudorapidity spectra in heavy-ion collision. Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 224 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00529-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00529-1