Skip to main content
Log in

Implications of the nuclear EMC effect

  • QNP 2006
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The discovery more than twenty years ago, by the EMC Collaboration, that the deep-inelastic-scattering DIS structure functions are influenced by the nuclear environment stunned the nuclear physics community and brought quarks and gluons into the field with great impact. A great length of time has passed, but despite a semi-infinite number of papers on the subject, there is no explanation that is universally accepted. Many models (related in one way or another to QCD) have been successful in reproducing data for deep inelastic scattering on nuclear targets, but fewer have described both the DIS and nuclear Drell-Yan experiments. Although there are some positive indications, no model has been used to predict correctly and unambiguously new independent phenomena. We review the history and discuss the best experimental prospects for future discovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Aubert, Phys. Lett. B 123, 275 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. For example, see the reviews: M. Arneodo, Phys. Rep. 240, 301 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L.L. Frankfurt, M.I. Strikman, Phys. Rep. 160, 235 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J.W. Chen, W. Detmold, Phys. Lett. B 625, 165 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. G.A. Miller, J.R. Smith, Phys. Rev. C 65, 015211 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. J.R. Smith, G.A. Miller, Phys. Rev. C 65, 055206 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. R.P. Bickerstaff, M.C. Birse, G.A. Miller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2532 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. D.M. Alde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2479 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. G.F. Bertsch, L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, Science 259, 773 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. P.A.M. Guichon, Phys. Lett. B 200, 235 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. I.C. Cloet, W. Bentz, A.W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 052302 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Diakonov, V.Y. Petrov, arXiv:hep-ph/0009006.

  13. J.R. Smith, G.A. Miller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 212301 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. L.L. Frankfurt, M.I. Strikman, Nucl. Phys. B 250, 143 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. M.R. Frank, B.K. Jennings, G.A. Miller, Phys. Rev. C 54, 920 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J.W. Negele, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 73, 92 (1999).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Strauch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 052301 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Schiavilla, O. Benhar, A. Kievsky, L.E. Marcucci, M. Viviani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 072303 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Schlumpf, hep-ph/9211255.

  20. G.A. Miller, M.R. Frank, Phys. Rev. C 65, 065205 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. O. Gayou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 092301 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. G.A. Miller, Phys. Rev. C 68, 022201 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. A. Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, G.A. Implications of the nuclear EMC effect. Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 578–584 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2006-10258-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2006-10258-6

PACS.

Navigation