Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Correspondence
Author's response
Free
  1. Arthur Franklin Gelb
  1. Correspondence to Arthur Franklin Gelb, Lakewood Regional Medical Center and Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 3650 E South St, Ste 308, Lakewood 90712, USA; afgelb{at}msn.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

I want to thank Drs Mahut and Delclaux for their interesting letter concerning our recent paper1 and would offer the following response. During acute asthma exacerbation only two of 15 patients with asthma (13%) had a combined abnormally elevated central airways nitric oxide (NO) flux and elevated peripheral airway/alveolar NO concentration after correction for NO axial back-diffusion. Central airways NO flux remained the major site of ‘NO-mediated inflammation’ in 13 of 15 patients with asthma since two had normal NO gas exchange despite acute exacerbation.1 This latter observation needs to be further investigated since the clinical response was similar to that in patients with asthma with abnormal NO gas exchange. Many years ago we investigated the simplified detection of peripheral airway disease and showed that analyses of the distal part of the maximum expiratory flow–volume curve were helpful.2 However, in a subsequent study3 we reported that, if the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) was ≥75%, the occurrence of an isolated abnormal mid forced expiratory flow (FEF25–75) was rare. However, if the FEV1/FVC was <75%, it would not be unusual to find an abnormal FEF25–75, but it would not discriminate peripheral from large central airways obstruction.3 I hope these comments are helpful and appreciate their interest.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Linked articles 147959.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles