Skip to main content
Log in

Utilization of Dietary Protein in the Litter-Dwelling Larva of Bibio marci (Diptera: Bibionidae)

  • SOIL BIOLOGY
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

As plant litter is typically N limited, protein digestion and amino acid assimilation are key processes in saprophagous invertebrates. The recalcitrance of dietary protein may be increased by their binding to phenolic compounds in humic substances. Binding phenolic compound to protein may be also important in humus acid formation and stabilization of nitrogen bounded protein in soil organic matter. Consequently, better understanding of interaction of protein and phenolic compounds in invertebrate gut is important not only from ecophysiology perspective but also in terms of soil organic matter dynamics. In this study, we evaluated the digestive efficiency of proteins during gut passage in the litter-dwelling larva of Bibio marci. Anterior part of the midgut is highly alkaline, which agrees with the protease pH optimum. We found large differences in protease activities of the leaf litter, gut, and excrements. However, individual gut compartments were close to one another in their protease activities. The same was true for the contents of amino acids and ammonia. Also, amino acid composition differed between compartments. Litter had the high content of glutamine and serine, whereas hindgut and excrement were characterized by the high content of methionine, and the remaining gut segments had the high content of valine. Experiment with 14C-labelled protein demonstrated that gut passage improved the digestive efficiency of proteins, especially for a humic acid stabilized protein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 15th ed. (American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, 1980).

  2. F. G. Boroojeni, B. Svihus, H. G. von Reichenbach, and J. Zentek, “The effects of hydrothermal processing on feed hygiene, nutrient availability, intestinal microbiota and morphology in poultry—A review,” Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 220, 187–215 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Brune, D. Emerson, and J. A. Breznak, “The termite gut microflora as an oxygen sink: microelectrode determination of oxygen and pH gradients in guts of lower and higher termites,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 2681–2687 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. A. Byzov, A. V. Kurakov, E. B. Tretyakova, V. N. Thanh, N. D. Toliin, and Y. M. Rabinovich, “Principles of the digestion of microorganisms in the gut of soil millipedes: specificity and possible mechanisms,” App-l. Soil Ecol. 9, 149–156 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(98)00068-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. M. Clark, “Evolution and adaptive significance of larval midgut alkalization in the insect superorder Mecopterida,” J. Chem. Ecol. 25, 1945–1960 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. W. Felton and S. S. Duffey, “Reassessment of the role of gut alkalinity and detergency in insect herbivory,” J. Chem. Ecol. 17, 1821–1836 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Frouz, “Effects of soil macro- and mesofauna on litter decomposition and soil organic matter stabilization,” Geoderma 332, 161–172 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.08.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Frouz, D. Elhottová, V. Šustr, V. Krištůfek, and J. Hubert, “Preliminary data about compartmentalization of the gut of the saprophagous dipteran larvae Penthetria holosericea (Bibionidae),” Eur. J. Soil Biol. 38, 47–51 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01123-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Frouz, P. Jedlička, H. Šimáčková, and Z. Lhotáková, “The life cycle, population dynamics, and contribution to litter decomposition of Penthetria holosericea (Diptera: Bibionidae) in an alder forest,” Eur. J. Soil Biol. 71, 21–27 (2015). https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Frouz, V. Krištůfek, X. Li, H. Šantrůčková, V. Šustr, and A. Brune, “Changes in amount of bacteria during gut passage of leaf litter and during coprophagy in three species of Bibionidae (Diptera) larvae,” Folia Microbiol. 48, 535–542 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Frouz, X. Li, A. Brune, V. Pižl, and E. V. Abakumov, “Effect of soil invertebrates on the formation of humic substances under laboratory conditions,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44, 893–896 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229311080047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Frouz, A. Špaldoňová, Z. Lhotáková, and T. Cajthaml, “Major mechanisms contributing to the macrofauna-mediated slow down of litter decomposition,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 91, 23–31 (2015b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.08.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Gillon and J.F. David, “The use of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to study chemical changes in the leaf litter consumed by saprophagous invertebrates,” Soil. Biol. Biochem. 33, 2159–2161 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00139-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Godel, T. Graser, P. Földi, P. Pfaender, and P. Fürst, “Measurement of free amino acids in human biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography,” J. Chromatogr. A 297, 49–61 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)89028-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Ji and A. Brune, “Digestion of peptidic residues in humic substances by an alkali-stable and humic-acid-tolerant proteolytic activity in the gut of soil-feeding termites,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 1648–1655 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.01.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Kappler and A. Brune, “Influence of gut alkalinity and oxygen status on mobilization and size-class distribution of humic acids in the hindgut of soil-feeding termites,” Appl. Soil. Ecol. 13, 219–229 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(99)00035-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Kappler, R. Ji, and A. Brune, “Synthesis and characterization of specifically 14C-labeled humic model compounds for feeding trials with soil-feeding termites,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 1271–1280 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00047-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. X. Li and A. Brune, “Selective digestion of the peptide and polysaccharide components of synthetic humic acids by the humivorous larva of Pachnoda ephippiata (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae),” Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 1476–1483 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Liebeke, N. Strittmatter, S. Fearn, A. J. Morgan, P. Kille, J. Fuchser, D. Wallis, V. Palchykov, J. Robertson, E. Lahive, D. J. Spurgeon, D. McPhail, Z. Takáts, and J. G. Bundy, “Unique metabolites protect earthworms against plant polyphenols,” Nat. Commun. 6, 7869 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Maraun, H. Martens, S. Migge, A. Theenhaus, and S. Scheu, “Adding to 'the enigma of soil animal diversity: fungal feeders and saprophagous soil invertebrates prefer similar food substrates,” Eur. J. Soil Biol. 39, 85–95 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(03)00006-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. F. Ponge, “Humus form in terrestrial ecosystem: a framework to biodiversity,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 35, 935–945 (2003).https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00149-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. F. Rocha, J. Dias, I. Geurden, M.T. Dinis, S. Panserat, and S. Engrola, “Dietary glucose stimulus at larval stage modifies the carbohydrate metabolic pathway in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) juveniles: an in vivo approach using C-14-starch,” Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Part A: Mol. Integr. Physiol. 201, 189–199 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.07.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Schaefer, “The soil fauna of a beech forest on limestone: trophic structure and energy budget,” Oecologia 82, 128–136 (1990). .https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. V. Šustr, U. Stingl, and A. Brune, “Microprofiles of oxygen, redox potential, and pH, and microbial fermentation products in the highly alkaline gut of the saprophagous larva of Penthetria holosericea (Diptera: Bibionidae),” J. Insect Physiol. 67, 64–69 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. I. M. Szabó, Microbial Communities in Forest Rendzina Ecosystem (Akademia Kiado, Budapest, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by a grant of the Czech Science Foundation [Grant no. 17-14409S]. The radioactive work was conducted in the laboratory of Prof. Dr. B. Schink at the University of Konstanz, Germany. Petr Lemkin, PhD is thanked for comments and linguistic improvements.

Conflict of interest: none.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Frouz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frouz, J., Lin, Q., Li, X. et al. Utilization of Dietary Protein in the Litter-Dwelling Larva of Bibio marci (Diptera: Bibionidae). Eurasian Soil Sc. 52, 1583–1587 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319120032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319120032

Keywords:

Navigation