Skip to main content
Log in

A Three-Phase PDV Signal-Processing Method that Eliminates the Influence of Acceleration on Determining Velocity

  • Published:
Technical Physics Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interference method for determining the velocity of objects using direct optical heterodyning (photonic Doppler velocimetry) has become widespread due to the ease of setting up the fiber-optic system, the unambiguous results that it produces, and the wide possibilities for varying the measurement accuracy and temporal resolution. The accuracy of velocity measurements can be fractions of a percent, but there are a number of factors that interfere with this. For example, a change in the velocity of an object, that is, its movement with acceleration, leads to a broadening of the signal spectrum with an increase in the working time window and, as a result, to a decrease, rather than an increase, in the accuracy of measuring the velocity. In this letter, a method is proposed that allows one to compensate for the effect of acceleration on the accuracy of velocity measurement. The proposed model for processing the registered signals makes it possible to determine both the acceleration and the velocity of the object. The applied algorithm made it possible to avoid the expansion of the spectrum with an increase in the time window and to improve the accuracy of measuring the velocity of a freely falling body by an order of magnitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. O. T. Strand et al., Proc. SPIE 5580 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.567579

  2. D. H. Dolan, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 051501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0004363

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. V. V. Svetozarov, Fundamentals of Statistical Processing of Measurement Results (MIFI, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Younk and B. Medina, AIP Conf. Proc. 1793, 160013 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4971753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Montgomery and D. O’Donoghue, Delta Scuti Star Newslett. 13, 28 (1999).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. D. H. Dolan, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 81, 053905 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3429257

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. T. V. Kazieva, A. P. Kuznetsov, K. L. Gubskii, M. V. Po-narina, and V. N. Reshetov, Tech. Phys. Lett. 43, 148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785017020055

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. D. H. Dolan and S. C. Jones, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 076102 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2754405

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Gorbashova et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 941, 012002 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/941/1/012002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported financially by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, agreement with the Joint Institute for High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences no. 075-15-2020-785.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. V. Kazieva.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazieva, T.V., Tishchenko, I.Y., Reshetov, V.N. et al. A Three-Phase PDV Signal-Processing Method that Eliminates the Influence of Acceleration on Determining Velocity. Tech. Phys. Lett. 48, 66–69 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106378502203004X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106378502203004X

Keywords:

Navigation