Abstract
To obtain statistical data on quantum-dot sizes, AFM topographic images of the substrate on which the dots under study are grown are analyzed. Due to the nonideality of the substrate containing height differences on the order of the size of nanoparticles at distances of 1–10 μm and the insufficient resolution of closely arranged dots due to the finite curvature radius of the AFM probe, automation of the statistical analysis of their large dot array requires special techniques for processing topographic images to eliminate the loss of a particle fraction during conventional processing. As such a technique, convolution of the initial matrix of the AFM image with a specially selected matrix is used. This makes it possible to determine the position of each nanoparticle and, using the initial matrix, to measure their geometrical parameters. The results of statistical analysis by this method of self-assembled InAs quantum dots formed on the surface of an AlGaAs epitaxial layer are presented. It is shown that their concentration, average size, and half-width of height distribution depend strongly on the In flow and total amount of deposited InAs which are varied within insignificant limits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. N. Ledentsov, V. M. Ustinov, V. A. Shchukin, P. S. Kop’ev, Zh. I. Alferov, and D. Bimberg, Semiconductors 32, 343 (1998).
D. Bimberg, M. Grundmann, and N. N. Ledentsov, Quantum Dot Heterostructures (Wiley, Chichester, 1998).
Self-Assembled Quantum Dots, Ed. by Z. M. Zhiming, Lecture Notes in Nanoscale Science and Technology, vol. 1 (Springer, 2008).
Quantum Dot Devices, Ed. by Z. M. Zhiming, Lecture Notes in Nanoscale Science and Technology, vol. 13 (Springer, 2012).
J. S. Villarrubia, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 102, 425 (1997).
Introduction to Circuit Analysis: Applications to Image and Signal Processing, Ed. by Ya. A. Furman (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].
R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing (Prentice Hall, 2007; Tekhnosfera, Moscow, 2005).
B. V. Bardin, V. V. Manoilov, I. V. Chubinskii-Nadezhdin, E. K. Vasil’eva, and I. V. Zarutskii, Nauch. Priborostroen. 20, 88 (2010).
D. Marr and E. Hildreth, Proc. R. Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 207, 187 (1980).
B. Yane, Digital Image Processing (Tekhnosfera, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].
P. Chuklanov, S. A. Ziganshina, and A. A. Bukharaev, Surf. Interface Anal. 38, 679 (2006).
PELCO AFM Gold Calibration Kit. http://www.tedpella.com/
J. Vesenka, S. Manne, R. Giberson, T. Marsh, and E. Henderson, Biophys. J. 65, 992 (1993).
G. E. Tsyrlin, N. P. Korneeva, V. N. Demidov, N. K. Polyakov, V. N. Petrov, and N. N. Ledentsov, Semiconductors 31, 1057 (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © V.A. Sevriuk, P.N. Brunkov, I.V. Shalnev, A.A. Gutkin, G.V. Klimko, S.V. Gronin, S.V. Sorokin, S.G. Konnikov, 2013, published in Fizika i Tekhnika Poluprovodnikov, 2013, Vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 921–926.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sevriuk, V.A., Brunkov, P.N., Shalnev, I.V. et al. Statistical analysis of AFM topographic images of self-assembled quantum dots. Semiconductors 47, 930–934 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106378261307021X
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106378261307021X