Skip to main content
Log in

Application of Non-Destructive Testing for Condition Analysis, Repair of Damages and Integrity Assessment of Vital Steel Structures

  • GENERAL FLAW DETECTION ISSUES
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Loads at vital steel structures occur during their production and assembly (residual stresses), during the execution of functional tasks in exploitation (stationary and dynamic loads) and during the disturbed process of exploitation (non-stationary dynamic loads). Considering the fact that stress concentrators, corrosion and unpredictable effects that occur during exploitation must be taken into account as well, it is clear that loading of vital structures during the design phase can not be represented with a model in which the parameters change uniformly. Therefore only experimental non-destructive tests performed at large steel structures during exploitation enable the assessment of their current condition, need for particular repairs and assessment of integrity. In that way the data necessary for determination of causes of degradation of material and welded joints at structures, for the evaluation of mutual influence of equipment parts, as well as for determination of functionality and reliability of operation of drive systems. This primarily refers to vital steel structures of bucket-wheel excavators, dredgers and cranes, as well as to vital steel structures at hydroelectric equipment, thermal power plant equipment, bridges etc. This paper presents the analysis of causes for the occurrence of damages at the support structure of the boom of the bucket-wheel excavator, which is operating at the open pit coal mine near Kostolac (Serbia), that was executed on the basis of non-destructive tests. The paper also contains the procedure for the repair of damaged structure through the application of adequate welding, performed at existing and newly produced components, and the assessment of structural integrity after the repair based on non-compliances detected during the design process, as well as during the making of the support structure of the bucket-wheel excavator boom due to inadequate radiuses defined during the processes of design and production and due to the existence of flaws on the surface and within welded joints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 16.
Fig. 17.
Fig. 18.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Arsić, M., Bošnjak, S., Zrnić, N., Sedmak, A., and Gnjatović, N., Bucket wheel failure caused by residual stresses in welded joints, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2011, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 700–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bošnjak, S., Arsić, M., Savićević, S., Milojević, G., and Arsić, D., Fracture analysis of the pulley of a bucket wheel boom hoist system, Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability, 2016 vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 155–163.https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2016.2.1

  3. Bošnjak, S., Arsić, M., Gnjatović, N., Milenović, I., and Arsić, D., Failure of the bucket wheel excavator buckets, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2018, vol. 84, pp. 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arsić, D., Nikolić, R., Lazić, V., Arsić, A., Savić, Z., Djačić, S., and Hadzima, B., Analysis of the cause of the girth gear tooth fracture occurrence at the bucket wheel excavator, Transp. Res. Procedia, 2019, vol. 40, pp. 413–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gašić, V., Arsić, A., and Flajs, Ž., Experimental study on the stresses at the I-beam end-plate moment connection, Struct. Integr. Life, 2019, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amir Hossein Keshvari Fard, Ghasemi, R., and Mohammadi, B., Study of EMI-based damage type identification in a cracked metallic specimen repaired by a composite patch, Russ. J. Nondestruct. Test., 2020, vol. 56, pp. 540–548. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830920060054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moczko, P., Pietrusiak, D., and Wieckowski Jedrzej, Investigation of the failure of the bucket wheel excavator bridge conveyor, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2019, vol. 106, p. 104180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yin, Y., Grondin, G.Y., Obaia, K.H., and Elwi, A.E., Fatigue life prediction of heavy mining equipment. Part 1: Fatigue load assessment and crack growth rate tests, J. Construct. Steel. Res., 2007, vol. 63, pp. 1494–1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yin, Y., Grondin, G.Y., Obaia, K.H., and Elwi, A.E., Fatigue life prediction of heavy mining equipment. Part 2: Behaviour of corner crack in steel welded box section and remaining fatigue life determination, J. Construct. Steel. Res., 2008, vol. 64, pp. 62–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Risteiu, M., Ileana, I., and Duma, S., New approaches in heavy duties industrial processes monitoring by using smart sensors, Acta Univ. Apulensis, 2006, vol. 12, pp. 80–92.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arsić, D., Gnjatović, N., Sedmak, S., Arsić, A., and Uhričik, M., Integrity assessment and determination of residual fatigue life of vital parts of bucket-wheel excavator operating under dynamic loads, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2019, vol. 105, pp. 182–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bartelmus, W. and Zimroz, R., A new feature for monitoring the condition of gearboxes in non-stationary operating conditions, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2009, vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  13. EN 10025-2. Hot rolled products of structural steels—Part 2: Technical delivery conditions for non-alloy structural steels, 2011.

  14. EN 13018. Non-destructive testing—Visual testing—General principles, 2001.

  15. EN ISO 3452-1. Non-destructive testing—Penetrant testing—Part 1: General principles, 2013.

  16. EN 499, E 42 2 Mo B 42. Welding consumables. Covered electrodes for manual metal arc welding of non alloy and fine grain steels, Classification, 1995.

  17. EN ISO 17640. Non-destructive testing of welds. Ultrasonic testing. Techniques, testing levels, and assessment, 2018.

  18. Sedmak, A., Hemer, A., Sedmak, S.A., Milović, L., Grbović, A., Čabrilo, A., and Kljajin, M., Welded joint geometry effect on fatigue crack growth resistance in different metallic materials, International Journal of Fatigue, 2021, vol. 150, p. 106298.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106298

  19. Hertzberg, R., Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials, New York: Wiley, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Arsić, M., Savić, Z., Sedmak, A., Bosnjak, S., and Sedmak, A., Experimental examination of fatigue life of welded joint with stress concentration, Fratt. Integr. Strutt., 2016, vol. 10, no. 36, pp. 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mijatović, T., Manjgo, M., Burzić, M., Čolić, K., Burzić, Z., and T. Vuherer, Structural integrity assessment from the aspect of fracture mechanics, Structural Integrity and Life, 2019, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 121–124.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dušan Arsić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arsić, M., Arsić, D., Flajs, Ž. et al. Application of Non-Destructive Testing for Condition Analysis, Repair of Damages and Integrity Assessment of Vital Steel Structures. Russ J Nondestruct Test 57, 918–931 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830921100053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830921100053

Keywords:

Navigation