Abstract
The nematode C. elegans is a classic study object of developmental biology and genetics, which is particularly suitable for studying the molecular bases of meiosis. Developing meiocytes are located in the threadlike gonads of C. elegans in linear gradient order of the stages of meiosis, which facilitates studying the order of intracellular events during meiosis. C. elegans has polycentric chromosomes. This causes a special order of events during meiosis, and as a consequence, meiosis in C. elegance differs from canonical meiosis of most eukaryotes. In the meiotic prophase I, all chromosomes carry single protein “pairing centers.” They are responsible for joining homologous chromosomes in pairs. This initiates the formation of synaptonemal complexes (SCs). Programmed double-stranded DNA breaks appear after initiation of the SC assembly, and they give rise to meiotic recombination. The initiation of meiotic recombination after the chromosome pairing distinguishes the C. elegans meiotic pattern from those in the absolute majority of eukaryotes studied. C. elegans has strict crossing over interference, which allows for the formation of one chiasma per bivalent. In the late prophase I, the polycentric centromeres are remodeled, one of the chromosome ends acquires a cuplike kinetochore, and during two meiotic divisions, chromosomes behave as monocentric. The study of meiosis in C. elegans allows for separate investigation of synapsis and recombination of homologous chromosomes and provides material for studying the evolution of meiosis.
References
Goldstein, P., The synaptonemal complexes of Caenorhabditis elegans: pachytene karyotype analysis of male and hermaphrodite wild-type and him mutants, Chromosoma, 1982, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 577–593.
Bogdanov, Yu.F., Formation synaptonemal–like polycomplexes at leptotene and normal synaptonemal complexes at zygotene in Ascaris suum male meiosis, Chromosoma, 1977, vol. 61, pp. 1–21.
Kundu, S.C. and Bogdanov, Yu.F., Ultrastructural studies of late meiotic prophase nuclei in spermatocytes of Ascaris sum, Chromosoma, 1979, vol. 70, pp. 375–384.
Phillips, C.M., McDonald, K.L., and Dernburg, A.F., Cytological analysis of meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans, Methods Mol. Biol., 2009, vol. 558, pp. 171–195.
Barnes, T.M., Kohara, Y., Coulson, A., and Hekimi, S., Meiotic recombination, noncoding DNA and genomic organization in Caenorhabditis elegans, Genetics, 1995, vol. 141, pp. 159–179.
Dernburg, A.F., McDonald, K., Moulder, G., et al., Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis, Cell, 1998, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 387–398.
Garcia-Muse, T. and Boulton, S.J., Meiotic recombination in Caenorhabditis elegans, Chromosome Res., 2007, vol. 15, pp. 607–621.
Lui, D.Y. and Coloiacovo, M.P., Meiotic development in Caenorhabditis elegans, Adv. Exp. Mol. Biol., 2013, vol. 75, pp. 133–170.
Rog, O. and Dernburg, A.E., Chromosome pairing and synapsis during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 2013, vol. 25, pp. 349–356.
Woglar, A. and Jantsch, V., Chromosome movement in meiosis I prophase of Caenorhabditis elegans, Chromosoma, 2014, vol. 123, pp. 15–24.
Hodgkin, J., Horvitz, H.R., and Brenner, S., Nondisjunction mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, Genetics, 1979, vol. 91, pp. 67–94.
Zetka, M. and Rose, A., The genetics of meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans, Trends Genet., 1995, vol. 11, pp. 27–31.
Friedland, A.E., Tzur, Y.B., Esvelt, K.M., et al., Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system, Nat. Methods, 2013, vol. 10, pp. 741–743.
Severson, A.F., Ling, L., van Zuylen, V., and Meyer, B.J., The axial element protein HTP-3 promotes cohesin loading and meiotic axis assembly in C. elegans to implement the meiotic program of chromosome segregation, Genes Dev., 2009, vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 1763–1778.
Lee, J. and Hirano, T., RAD21L, a novel cohesin subunit implicated in linking homologous chromosomes in mammalian meiosis, J. Cell Biol., 2011, vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 263–276.
Seitan, V.C., Banks, P., Laval, S., et al., Metazoan Scc4 homologs link sister chromatid cohesion to cell and axon migration guidance, PLoS Biol., 2006, vol. 4, no. 8: e242
Lightfoot, J., Testori, S., Barroso, C., and Martinez-Perez, E., Loading of meiotic cohesin by SCC-2 is required for processing of DSBs and for the DNA damage checkpoint, Curr. Biol., 2011, vol. 32, no. 17, pp. 1421–1430.
Wang, F., Yoder, J., Antoshechkin, I., and Han, M., Caenorhabditis elegans EVL-14/PDS-5 and SCC-3 are essential for sister chromatid cohesion in meiosis and mitosis, Mol. Cell Biol., 2003, vol. 23, no. 21, pp. 7698–7707.
Crittenden, S.L., Leonard, K.A., Byrd, D.T., and Kimble, J., Cellular analysis of the mitotic region in the Caenorhabtiis elegans adult germline, Mol. Biol. Cell, 2006, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 3051–3061.
Bogdanov, Yu.F., The unusually early formation of synaptonemal-like polycomplexes, in meiosis in males of ascarids, Tsitologiya, 1978, vol. 20, pp. 460–463.
Villeneuve, A.M., A cis-acting locus that promotes crossing over between X chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans, Genetics, 1994, vol. 136, pp. 887–902.
McKim, K.S., Howell, A.M., and Rose, A.M., The effect of translocation on recombination frequency in Caenorhabditis elegans, Genetics, 1988, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 987–1001.
Smolikov, S., Schild-Prufert, K., and Colaiacovo, M.P., CRA-1 uncovers a double-strand break-dependent pathway promoting the assembly of central region proteins on chromosome axes during C. elegans meiosis, PLoS Genet., 2008, vol. 4, no. 6. e1000088
Phillips, C.M., Wong, C., Bhalla, N., et al., HIM-8 binds to the X chromosome pairing center and mediates chromosome-specific meiotic synapsis, Cell, 2005, vol. 123, pp. 1051–1063.
Phillips, C.M. and Dernburg, A.F., A family of zincfinger proteins is required for chromosome-specific pairing and synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans, Dev. Cell., 2006, vol. 11, pp. 817–829.
MacQueen, A.J. and Villeneuve, A.M., Nuclear reorganization and homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase require C. elegans CHK-2, Genes Dev., 2001, vol. 15, pp. 1674–1687.
Rosenbluth, R.E. and Baillie, D.L., The genetic analysis of a reciprocal translocation, eT1(III; V), in Caenorhabditis elegans, Genetics, 1981, vol. 99, pp. 415–428.
Rose, A.M., Baillie, D.L., and Curran, J., Meiotic pairing behavior of two free duplications of linkage group I in Caenorhabditis elegans, Mol. Gen. Genet., 1984, vol. 195, pp. 52–56.
Herman, R.K. and Kari, C.K., Recombination between small X chromosome duplications and the X chromosome in Caenorhabditis elegans, Genetics, 1989, vol. 121, pp. 723–737.
Bogdanov, Yu.F., Grishaeva, T.M., and Dadashev, S.Ya., Similarity of the domain structure of proteins as a basis for the evolutionarily conservation of meiosis, Int. Rev. Cytol., 2007, vol. 257, pp. 83–142.
Bogdanov, Yu.F., Inverted meiosis and its place in the evolution of sexual reproduction pathways, Russ. J. Genet., 2016, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795416050033.
Penkner, A.M., Fridkin, A., Gloggnitzer, J., et al., Meiotic chromosome homology search involves modifications of the nuclear envelope protein Matefin/SUN-1, Cell, 2009, vol. 139, pp. 920–933.
Sato, A., Isaac, B., and Phillips, C.M., Cytoskeletal forces span the nuclear envelope to coordinate meiotic chromosome pairing and synapsis, Cell, 2009, vol. 139, pp. 907–919.
Wynne, D.J., Rog, O., Carlton, P.M., and Dernburg, A.F., Dynein-dependent processive chromosome motions promote homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis, J. Cell Biol., 2012, vol. 196, pp. 47–64.
Harper, N.C., Rillo, R., Jover-Gil, S., et al., Pairing centers recruit a Polo-like kinase to orchestrate meiotic chromosome dynamics in C. elegans, Dev. Cell, 2011, vol. 21, pp. 934–947.
Labella, S., Woglar, A., Jantsch, V., and Zetka, M., Polo kinases establish links between meiotic chromosomes and cytoskeletal forces essential for homolog pairing, Dev. Cell., 2011, vol. 21, pp. 948–958.
Baudrimont, A., Penkner, A., Woglar, A., et al., Leptotene/zygotene chromosome movement via the SUN/KASH protein bridge in Caenorhabditis elegans, PLoS Genet., 2010, vol. 6. e1001219
Couteau, F. and Zetka, M., DNA damage during meiosis induces chromatin remodeling and synaptonemal complex disassembly, Dev. Cell, 2011, pp. 20, no. 3, pp. 353–363.
Cremer, T., Cremer, M., Dietzel, S., et al., Chromosome territories—a functional nuclear landscape, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 2006, vol. 18, pp. 307–316.
Martinez-Perez, E. and Villeneuve, A.M., HTP-1-dependent constraints coordinate homolog pairing and synapsis, and promote chiasma formation during C. elegans meiosis, Genes Dev., 2005, vol. 19, no. 22, pp. 2727–2743.
Couteau, F., Nabeshima, K., Villeneuve, A., and Zetka, M., A component of C. elegans meiotic chromosome axis at the interface of homolog alignment, synapse, nuclei reorganization, and recombination, Curr. Biol., 2004, vol. 14, pp. 585–592.
MacQueen, A.J., Phillips, C.M., Bhalla, N., et al., Chromosome sites play dual role to establish homologous synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans, Cell, 2005, vol. 123, pp. 1037–1050.
Smolikov, S., Schild-Prufert, K., and Colaiacovo, M.P., A yeast two-hybrid screen for SYP-3 interactors identifies SYP-4, a component required for synaptonemal complex assembly and chiasma formation in Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis, PLoS Genet., 2009, vol. 5, no. 10. e1000669
MacQueen, A.J., Colaiacovo, M.P., McDonald, K., and Villenueve, A.M., Synapsis dependent and intependent mechanism stabilize homolog pairing during meiotic 4 in C. elegans, Genes Dev., 2002, vol. 18, pp. 2428–2442.
Colaiacovo, M.P., MacQueen, A.J., Martinez-Perez, E., et al., Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination, Dev. Cell, 2003, vol. 5, pp. 464–474.
Alpi, A., Pasierbek, P., Gartner, A., and Loidl, J., Genetic and cytological characterization of the recombination protein RAD-51 in Caenorhabditis elegans, Chromosoma, 2003, vol. 112, pp. 6–16.
Mets, D.G. and Meyer, B.J., Condensins regulate meiotic DNA break distribution, thus crossover frequency, by controlling chromosome structure, Cell, 2009, vol. 139, pp. 73–86.
Barber, L.J., Youds, J.L., Ward, J.D., et al., RTEL1 maintains genomic stability by suppressing homologous recombination, Cell, 2008, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 261–271.
Youds, J.L., Mets, D.G., McIlwraith, M.J., et al., RTEL-1 enforces meiotic crossover interference and homeostasis, Science, 2010, vol. 327, no. 5970, pp. 1254–1258.
Martin, J.S., Winkelmann, N., Petalcorin, M.I., et al., RAD-51-dependent and-independent roles of a Caenorhabditis elegans BRCA2-related protein during DNA double-strand break repair, Mol. Cell Biol., 2005, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 3127–3139.
Page, S.L. and Hawley, R.S., Genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex, Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 2004, vol. 20, pp. 525–558.
Petalcorin, M.I., Sandall, J., Wigley, D.B., and Boulton, S.J., CeBRC-2 stimulates D-loop formation by RAD-51 and promotes DNA single-strand annealing, J. Mol. Biol., 2006, vol. 361, no. 2, pp. 231–242.
Allers, T. and Lichten, M., Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis, Cell, 2001, vol. 106, pp. 47–57.
Bishop, D.K. and Zickler, D., Early decision: meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis, Cell, 2004, vol. 117, pp. 9–15.
Börner, G.V, Kleckner, N., and Hunter, N., Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis, Cell, 2004, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 29–45.
Hayashi, M., Chin, G.M., and Villeneuve, A.M.C., C. elegans germ cells switch between distinct modes of double-strand break repair during meiotic prophase progression, PLoS Genet., 2007, vol. 3, no. 11. e191
Goldfarb, T. and Lichten, M., Frequent and efficient use of the sister chromatid for DNA doublestrand break repair during budding yeast meiosis, PLoS Biol., 2010, vol. 8, no. 110. e1000520
Hillers, K.J. and Villeneuve, A.M., Chromosome-wide control of meiotic crossing over in C. elegans, Curr. Biol., 2003, vol. 13, no. 18, pp. 1641–1647.
Pan, J., Sasaki, M., Kniewel, R., et al., A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation, Cell, 2011, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 719–731.
Smagulova, F., Gregoretti, I.V., Brick, K., et al., Genome wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots, Nature, 2011, vol. 472, no. 7343, pp. 375–378.
Rosu, S., Libuda, D.E., and Villeneuve, A.M., Robust crossover assurance and regulated interhomolog access maintain meiotic crossover number, Science, 2011, vol. 334, pp. 1286–1289.
Boddy, M.N., Gaillard, P.H., McDonald, W.H., et al., Mus81-Eme1 are essential components of a Holliday junction resolvase, Cell, 2001, vol. 107, no. 4.
Nabeshima, K., Villeneuve, A.M., and Hillers, K.J., Chromosome-wide regulation of meiotic crossover formation in Caenorhabditis elegans requires properly assembled chromosome axes, Genetics, 2004, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 1275–1292.
Kohl, K.P. and Sekelsky, J., Meiotic and mitotic recombination in meiosis, Genetics, 2013, vol. 194, pp. 327–334.
De Muyt, A., Jessop, L., Kolar, E., et al., BLM helicase ortholog Sgs1 is a central regulator of meiotic recombination intermediate metabolism, Mol. Cell, 2012, vol. 46, pp. 43–53.
Zakharyevich, K., Tang, S., Ma, Y., and Hunter, N., Delineation of joint molecule resolution pathways in meiosis identifies a crossover-specific resolvase, Cell, 2012, vol. 149, pp. 334–347.
O’Neil, N.J., Martin, J.S., Youds, J.L., et al., Joint molecule resolution requires the redundant activities of MUS-81 and XPF-1 during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis, PLoS Genet., 2013, vol. 9. e1003582. doi 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003582
Saito, T.T., Lui, D.Y., Kim, H-M., et al., Interplay between structure-specific endonucleases for crossover control during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis, PLoS Genet., 2013, vol. 9. e1003586. doi 10.1371/journal. pgen.1003586
Agostinho, A., Meier, B., Sonneville, R., et al., Combinatorial regulation of meiotic Holliday junction resolution in C. elegans by HIM-6 (BLM) helicase, SLX-4, and the SLX-1, MUS-81 and XPF-1 nucleases, PLoS Genet., 2013, vol. 9. e1003591. doi 10.1371/journal. pgen.1003591
Bellendir, S.P. and Sekelsky, J., An elegans solution for crossover formation, PLoS Genet., 2013, vol. 9, no. 7. e1003658
Ip, S.C., Rass, U., Blanco, M.G., et al., Identification of Holliday junction resolvases from humans and yeast, Nature, 2008, vol. 456, pp. 357–361.
Bhalla, N., Wynne, D.J., Jantsch, V., and Dernburg, A.F., ZHP-3 acts at crossovers to couple meiotic recombination with synaptonemal complex disassembly and bivalent formation in C. elegans, PLoS Genet., 2008, vol. 4. e1000235
Yokoo, R., Zawadzki, K.A., Nabeshima, K., et al., COSA-1 reveals robust homeostasis and separable licensing and reinforcement steps governing meiotic crossovers, Cell, 2012, vol. 149, pp. 75–87.
Nabeshima, K., Villeneuve, A.M., and Colaiácovo, M.P., Crossing over is coupled to late meiotic prophase bivalent differentiation through asymmetric disassembly of the SC, J. Cell Biol., 2005, vol. 168, pp. 683–689.
de Carvalio, S.E., Zaaijer, S., Smolikov, S., et al., LAB-1 antagonize the Aurora B kinase in C. elegsans, Genes Dev., 2008, vol. 22, no. 20, pp. 2869–2885.
Kitajima, T.S., Kawashima, S.A., and Watanabe, Y., The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis, Nature, 2004, vol. 427, no. 6974, pp. 510–517.
Grishaeva, T.M., Kulichenko, D., and Bogdanov, Y.F., Bioinformatical analysis of eukaryotic shugoshins reveals meiosis-specific features of vertebrate shugoshins, Peer J., 2016. 4:e2736.2016. 4:e2736.
Bhalla, N. and Dernburg, A.F., A conserved checkpoints monitor meiotic chromosome synapsis in Caenorhabditis elegans, Science, 2005, vol. 310, no. 5754, pp. 1683–1686.
Harper, N.C., Rillo, R., Jover-Gil, S., et al., Pairing centers recruit a Polo-like kinase to orchestrate meiotic chromosome dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans, Dev. Cell., 2011, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 934–947.
Joyce, E.F. and McKim, K.S., Drosophila PCH2 is required for a pachytene checkpoint that monitors double-strand-break-independent events leading to meiotic crossover formation, Genetics, 2009, vol. 181, pp. 39–51.
Joshi, N., Barot, A., Amison, C., and Borner, G.V., Pch2 links chromosome axis at future crossover sites and crossover distribution during yeast meiosis, PLoS Genet., 2009, vol. 5, no. 7. e1000557
Wignall, S.M. and Villeneuve, A.M., Lateral microtubule bundles promote chromosome alignment during acentrosomal oocyte meiosis, Nat. Cell Biol., 2009, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 839–844.
Dumont, J., Oegema, K., and Desai, A., A kinetochore-independent mechanism drives anaphase chromosome separation during acentrosomal meiosis, Nat. Cell Biol., 2010, vol. 12, pp. 894–901.
Kaitna, S., Pasierbek, P., and Jantsch, M., The Aurora B kinase AIR-2 regulates kinetochores during mitosis and is required for separation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis, Curr. Biol., 2002, vol. 12, pp. 798–812.
Rogers, E., Bishop, J.D., Waddle, J.A., et al., The Aurora kinase AIR-2 functions in the release of chromosome cohesion in Caenohabditis elegans meiosis, J. Cell Biol., 2002, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 219–229.
Bogdanov, Yu.F., Konservatizm i evolyutsiya meioza: molekulyarnye osnovy (Conservatism and the Evolution of Meiosis: the Molecular Basis), Lambert Academic Publishing, 2016.
Heckman, S., Jankowska, M., Schubert, V., et al., Altenative meiotic chromatid segregation in the holocentric plant Luzula elegans, Nat. Comm., 2014. doi 10.1038/ncomms5979
Grishaeva, T.M. and Bogdanov, Yu.F., Evolutionary conservation of recombination proteins and variability of meiosis-specific proteins of chromosomes, Russ. J. Genet., 2017, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 542–550. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795417040081.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © Yu.F. Bogdanov, 2017, published in Genetika, 2017, Vol. 53, No. 12, pp. 1363–1379.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bogdanov, Y.F. Noncanonical meiosis in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for studying the molecular bases of the homologous chromosome synapsis, crossing over, and segregation. Russ J Genet 53, 1283–1298 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S102279541712002X
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S102279541712002X