Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the state of the gene pool of natural populations dwelling in the fragmented landscape of Moscow and Moscow region (with special reference to brown frogs)

  • General Genetics
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A system of urban ecological genetic monitoring of vertebrates has been developed for the first time in Russia and in the world. As a model, two species of brown frogs, Rana arvalis Nilss. and R. temporaria L. (16 populations, seven isozyme loci) were used. An evaluation of the gene pool state in urban frog populations has shown that the diversity in the Moscow frog populations was lower than that in natural populations (up to 80 and 50% in respectively R. arvalis and R. temporaria). Mean heterozygosities per locus were higher in large natural populations than in small urban isolates: in R. arvalis, these values were 0.16 and 0.06; in R. temporaria, 0.34 and 0.18, respectively. The number of polymorphic loci was also higher in natural populations than in the urban ones: 4 versus 2 in R. arvalis and 5 versus 4 in R. temporaria. Using superoxiddismutase as an example, fixation of different alleles of the same locus in different small isolates was shown. The gene pool condition of all but one urban populations of brown frog was evaluated as unsatisfactory, and that of the R. arvalis populations, as critical. These changes of the gene pool are explained mainly by gene drift accompanied by inbreeding, which was caused by human-induced fragmentation of the range and a decrease in population size of the species. The results of this study was employed in the development of the Moscow governmental program on restoration of the gene pools of vanishing animal species on specially protected natural urban territories. The series of works on long-term monitoring and assessment of the state of natural populations of model species in anthropogenic landscapes of Moscow and Moscow region has laid a foundation for a new branch of science, gene urbanology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altukhov, Yu.P., Geneticheskie protsessy v populyatsiyakh (Genetic Processes in Populations), Moscow: Akademkniga, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altukhov, Yu.P., Intraspecific Genetic Diversity: Monitoring and Conservation, Rus. J. Genet., 1995, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1133–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Makeeva, V.M., Nepoklonova, M.I., and Panfilov, D.V., Ekosistemnyi podkhod k izucheniyu zhivotnogo mira prirodnykh zon (Ecosystemic Approach to Study of the Fauna of Natural Zones), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1994, pp. 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Makeeva, V.M., Anthropogenic Transformation of the Animal Gene Pool in the Global Ecosphere, in Nauka o Zemle: geoekologiya (Science of Earth: Geoecology), Moscow: FGOU VPO, MGAVMiB, 2003, pp. 242–265.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Makeeva, V.I., The Role of Ecological Genetic Monitoring in the Assessment of the Process of Degradation of Anthropogenic Landscape Ecosystems (Exemplified by Ground Snails), Modern Problems of Bioindication and Biomonitoring: Proc. 11th Int. Symp. of the Bioindicators, Syktyvkar, 2003, pp. 253–263.

  6. Makeeva, V.M., Role of Ecological Genetic Monitoring in Estimating the Degree of Anthropogenic Transformation of Natural Ecosystems (with the Example of Terrestrial Mollusks), Sovremennye problemy bioindikatsii i biomonitoringa: Tez. 11-go mezhdunar. simpoz. (Modern Problems of Bioindication and Biomonitoring: Proc. 11th Int. Symp.), Syktyvkar, 2001, p. 103.

  7. Makeeva, V.M., Ecological Genetic Analysis of the Colony Structure in Snail Bradybaena fruticum (Müll.) in an Anthropogenic Landscape of the Moscow Region, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1988, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Makeeva, V.M., Role of Natural Selection in Genotypic Specifics of Mollusk Populations (with the Example of Snail Bradybaena fruticum (Müll.)), Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1989, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Makeeva, V.M., Effect of Anthropogenic Insulation on the Spatial Genetic Structure of Invertebrate Populations (with the Example of Terrestrial Mollusks), in Mater. Moskovskoi mezhregional’noi prakticheskoi konf. “Zhivotnye v gorode” (Proc. Moscow Interregional Conf. “Animals in Towns”), Moscow: IPEE RAN, 2000, pp. 64–66.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Matekin, P.V., Makeeva, V.M., and Pakhorukova, L.V., Biogeographical Characterization and State of Moscow Parks As Inferred from Analysis of Snail Bradybaena fruticum (Müll.), Mater. Moskovskoi mezhregional’noi nauchno-prakticheskoi konf. “Zhivotnye v gorode” (Proc. Moscow Interregional Conf. “Animals in Towns”), Moscow, 2000, pp. 66–67.

  11. Makeeva, V.M., Pakhorukova, L.V., and Ugolkova, N.G., Analysis of the Dynamics of Polymorphic Traits in Populations of Snail Bradybaena fruticum (Müll.) for the Purposes of Ecological Monitoring: Communication 1, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1995, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 570–587.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Makeeva, V.M. and Pakhorukova, L.V., Role of Natural Selection in Maintaining a Stable Genotypic Composition of Natural Populations of Snail Bradybaena fruticum (Müll.), Mollusca, Gastroroda, As Inferred from Ecological Monitoring, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2000, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 638–661.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matekin, P.V. and Makeeva, V.M., Polymorphic Esterase System and Species Spatial Structure in Snail Bradybaena fruticum (Müll.), Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1977, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 908–913.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Makeeva, V.M., Malyuchenko, O.L., Belokon’, M.M., et al., Evaluation of the State of the Gene Pool of Natural Populations of Snail Bradybaena fruticum (Müll.) in the Anthropogenic Landscape of Moscow and Moscow Region, in Genetika v 21 veke: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya: Tr. 3-go s”zda VOGiS (Genetics in the 21st Century: Problems and Prospects: Proc. 3rd. Meet. of the All-Russian Soc. of Geneticists and Breeders), Moscow, 2004, p. 210.

  15. Makeeva, V.M., Malyuchenko, O.P., Belokon’, M.M., et al., Anthropogenic Isolation As a Factor of Population Degradation, Vestn. Tomsk. Univ., supply: Dokl. 3-i mezhdunar. konf. “Problemy vida i vidoobrazovaniya” 20–22 oktyabrya 2004 g (Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. “Problems of Species and Speciation,” October 20–22, 2004), Tomsk, 2004, issue 10, pp. 47–50.

  16. Makeeva, V.M., Fate of Wild Animals in Towns: The Theory of Inevitable Extinction, Tez. Nauchno-praktich. konf. “Zhivotnye v gorode” (Proc. Conf. “Animals in Towns”), Moscow, 2003, pp. 6–9.

  17. Lawson, R. and King, R.B., Gene Flow and Melanism in Lake Erie Garter Snake Populations, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 1996, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alf, R., Hille, A., and Kneitz, G., Genetische populations Structure von Uelbhalsmausen, Apodemus flavicollis in einor intensiv genutzten Agrarland schaft im ostlichen Westftlen, Abb. Westfal. Mus. Naturk, 1997, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schug, M.D., Downhower, J.F., Brown, L.P., et al., Isolation and Genetic Diversity of Gambusia hubbsi (Mosquitofish) Populations in Blueholes on Andros Island, Bahamas, Heredity, 1998, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 336–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Platz, J.I. and Grudzien, T.A., Limited Genetic Heterozygosity and Status of Two Populations of the Ramsey Canyon Leopard Frog, Rana subaquavocalis, J. Herpetol., 2003, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 758–761.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wlasiuk, G., Garza, J.C., and Lessa, I.P., Genetic and Geographic Differentiation in the Rio-Negro Tuco-Tuco (Ctenomys rionegrensis): Inferring the Roles of Migration and Drift from Multiple Genetic Markers, Evolution, 2003, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 913–926.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Masayuki, S. and Midori, N., Genetic Differentiation of the Japanese Brown Frog, Rana japonica, Elucidated by Electrophoretic Analyses of Enzymes and Blood Proteins, Sci. Rept. Leb. Amphib. Biol. Hiroshima Univ., 1994, vol. 13, pp. 137–171.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kamalesh, C. and Malay, D., Electrophoretic Investigation on Seven Species of Indian Frogs, Cytobios, 1998, vol. 94, no. 375, pp. 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fraguedakis-Tsolis, S., Hauffe, H.C., and Searle, J.B., Genetic Distinctiveness of a Village Population of House Mice: Relevance to Speciation and Chromosomal Evolution, Proc. R. Soc. London, B, 1997, vol. 264, pp. 355–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Arguedas, N. and Parker, P.G., Seasonal Migration and Genetic Population Structure in House Wrens, Condor, 2000, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 517–528.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zippel, K., Conserving the Panamian Golden Frog: Proyecto Rana dorada, in 4th World Congr. of Gerpetology, Bentota, 3–9 Dec., 2001, Herpetol. Rev., 2002, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Makeeva, V.M., Malyuchenko, O.P., Belokon’, M.M., et al., Evaluation of the State of the Gene Pool in Natural Populations of Brown Frog in Anthropogenic Landscapes of Moscow and Moscow Region, in Genetikav 21 veke: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya: Tr. 3-go s”ezda VOGiS (Genetics in the 21st Century: Problems and Prospects: Proc. 3rd. Meet. of the All-Russian Soc. of Geneticists and Breeders), Moscow, 2004, p. 211.

  28. Bannikov, A.G., Darevskii, I.S., and Rustamov, A.K., Zemnovodnye i presmykayushchiesya SSSR (Amphibians and Reptiles of the Soviet Union), Moscow: Mysl’, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Konnert, M. and Maurer, W., Isozymic Investigations on Norway Spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and European Silver Fir (Abies alba Mill.): A Practical Guide to Separation Methods and Zymogram Evaluation, in German Federal-State Working Group: Conservation of Forest Gene Resources, Gottingen, 1995.

  30. Markert, C.L. and Faulhaber, I., Lactate Dehydrogenase Isozyme Patterns in Fish, J. Exp. Zool., 1965, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 319–332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Serov, O.L., Korochkin, L.I., and Manchenko, G.P., Electrophoretic Methods of Isozyme Analysis, in Genetika izofermentov (Isozyme Genetics), Moscow: Nauka, 1977, pp. 23–64.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Manchenko, G.P., Handbook of Detection of Enzymes on Electrophoretic Gels, CRC, 1984.

  33. Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry, Enzyme Nomenclature, Orlando: Academic, 1984.

  34. Wright, S., Evolution and the Genetics of Population: Variability within and among Natural Populations, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nei, M., Genetic Distance between Populations, Am. Nat., 1972, vol. 106, pp. 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chetverikov, S.S., On Some Aspects of Evolution from the Viewpoint of Modern Genetics, Zh. Eksp. Biol., 1926, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3–54.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Leont’eva, O.A., Semenov, D.V., and Samoilov, B.L., Brown Frog Rana temporaria Linneus, 1758, in Krasnaya kniga goroda Moskvy (Red Book of Moscow), Moscow: ABF, 2001, pp. 231–233.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Leont’eva, O.A., Semenov, D.V., and Samoilov, B.L., Piked Frog Rana arvalis Nilsson, 1842, in Krasnaya kniga goroda Moskvy (Red Book of Moscow), Moscow: ABF, 2001, pp. 234–235.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Makeeva, V.M., On the Advisability of Isolating Genourbanology As an Independent Branch, 7-ya Mezhdunar. nauchnaya konf. “Novye idei v naukakh o Zemle”: Mater. Dokladov (Proc. 7th Int. Conf. “New Ideas in Earth Sciences”), Moscow, 2005, p. 28.

  40. Makeeva, V.M. and Golubeva, E.I., Biomass Structure in Zonal Ecosystems and Their Anthropogenic Transformation, Biogeografiya s osnovami ekologii (Biogeography with Basics of Ecology), Voronov, A.G. and Myalo, E.G., Eds., Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1991, pp. 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Makeeva, V.M., Complex Living Systems of Anthropogenic Landscapes: Genetic Imperative, Sinergetika: Tr. seminara (Synergy: Proc. Conf.), vol. 5: Materialy kruglogo stola 11 noyabrya 2001 g. “Slozhnye sistemy: idei, problemy, perspektivy” (Proc. Round Table of November 11, 2001: “Complex Systems: Ideas, Problems, Prospects”) Moscow, 2003, pp. 307–319.

  42. Makeeva, V.M. and Nepoklonova, M.I., Fauna As a Component of the Biosphere and Ecosphere, in Nauka o Zemle: geoekologiya (Science of Earth: Geoecology), Moscow: MGAVMiB, 2003, pp. 242–264.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Makeeva, V.M., Nepoklonova, M.I., Kozoderov, V.V., and Shishkina, L.P., Flora and Fauna, in Zemlevedenie (Earth Sciences), vol. 2: Materiki (Continents), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2004, pp. 106–144; 209–229; 287–294; 336–344; 371–379; 416–436.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Makeeva, V.M. and Volkova, E.B., On the Necessity of Introducing Snake Bradybaena fruticum in the Red Book of Moscow, in Zhivotnye v gorode. Mater. nauchno-praktich. konf. (Animals in Towns: Proc. Conf.), Moscow, 2004, pp. 68–69.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.M. Makeeva, M.M. Belokon, O.P. Malyuchenko, O.A. Leont’eva, 2006, published in Genetika, 2006, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 628–642.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Makeeva, V.M., Belokon, M.M., Malyuchenko, O.P. et al. Evaluation of the state of the gene pool of natural populations dwelling in the fragmented landscape of Moscow and Moscow region (with special reference to brown frogs). Russ J Genet 42, 505–517 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795406050073

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795406050073

Keywords

Navigation