Skip to main content
Log in

The rates of shoot and root growth in intact plants of pea mutants in leaf morphology

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Plant Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Isogenic lines of pea (Pisum sativum L.) with the genetically determined changes in leaf morphology, afila (af) and tendril-less (tl), were used to study the relationship between shoot and root growth rates. The time-course of shoot and root growth was followed during the pre-floral period in the intact plants grown under similar conditions. The af mutation produced afila leaves without leaflets, whereas in the case of the tl mutations, tendrils were substituted with leaflets, and acacia-like leaves were developed. Due to the changes in leaf morphology caused by these mutations, pea genotypes differed in leaf area: starting from day 7, the leaf area was lower in the af plants and larger in the tl plants as compared to the wild-type plants. Such divergence was amplified in the course of plant development and reached its maximum immediately before the transition to flowering. Plants of isogenic lines did not notably differ in stem surface areas. In spite of significant difference in total leaf area, the wild type and tl plants did not differ in leaf dry weight. Starting from leaf 9, the af plants lagged behind two leaflet-bearing genotypes (wild type and tl) in leaf dry weight, whereas stem dry weight was similar in the wild type and tl forms and slightly lower in the af plants. Root dry weights were practically similar in the wild type and tl plants until flowering. The reduction of leaf area in the af plants drastically reduced root dry weight. In other words, the latter index was related to the total weight and total area of leaves and stems. The correlation analysis demonstrated an extremely low relationship between leaf and stem area and dry weight and those of roots early in plant development (when plants develop five to seven leaves). Later, immediately before flowering (nine to eleven leaves), root weight was positively related to leaf weight and area; however, stem area and root weight did not correlate. Thus, in three genotypes (wild type, af, and tl), at the end of their vegetative growth phase, leaf and root biomass accumulated in proportion, independently of leaf area expansion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chailakhyan, M.Kh., Organism Integrity in the World of Vegetables, Fiziol. Rast. (Moscow), 1980, vol. 27, pp. 917–941 (Sov. Plant Physiol., Engl. Transl.).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Passioura, J.B., Root Signals Control Leaf Expansion in Wheat Seedlings in Drying Soil, Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 1988, vol. 15, pp. 687–693.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Polevoi, V.V., The Physiology of Plant Integrity, Fiziol. Rast. (Moscow), 2001, vol. 48, pp. 631–643 (Russ. J. Plant Physiol., Engl. Transl., pp. 545–555).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mishra, N.S., Mallick, B.N., and Sopory, S.K., Electrical Signal from Root to Shoot in Sorghum bicolor: Induction of Leaf Opening and Evidence for Fast Extracellular Propagation, Plant Sci., 2001, vol. 160, pp. 237–245.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson, I.R., Melkonian, J.J., Thornley, J.H.M., and Riha, S.J., A Model of Water Flow through Plants Incorporating Shoot/Root “Message” Control of Stomatal Conductance, Plant, Cell Environ., 1991, vol. 14, pp. 531–544.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davies, W.J. and Zhang, J., Root Signal and the Regulation of Growth and Development of Plants in Drying Soil, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 1991, vol. 42, pp. 55–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smolders, E. and Merckx, R., Growth and Shoot: Root Partitioning of Spinach Plants as Affected by Nitrogen Supply, Plant, Cell Environ., 1992, vol. 15, pp. 795–807.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeschke, W.D. and Hurtung, W., Root-Shoot Interactions in Mineral Nutrition, Plant Soil, 2000, vol. 226, pp. 57–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Richards, D. and Rowe, R.N., Effects of Root Restriction upon Peach Seedlings, Ann. Bot. (London), 1977, vol. 41, pp. 729–740.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vysotskaya, L.B., Timergalina, L.N., Arkhipova, T.N., Dedov, A.V., and Kudoyarova, G.R., Hormones and Water Metabolism in Wheat Plants with Partially Cut Roots, Immunoanaliz regulyatorov rosta v reshenii problem fiziologii rastenii, rastenievodstva i biotekhnologii (Immunological Analysis of Growth Regulators for the Problems of Plant Physiology, Plant Growing, and Biotechnology), Vakhitov, V.A., Ed., Ufa: Bashkir. Gos. Univ., 2000, pp. 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krenke, N.P., Regeneratsiya rastenii (Plant Regeneration), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yusufov, A.G., Mekhanizmy regeneratsii rastenii (Mechanisms of Plant Regeneration), Rostov-on-Don: Rostov. Gos. Univ., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lichtenthaler, H.K., Vegetation Stress: An Introduction to the Stress Concept in Plant, J. Plant Physiol., 1996, vol. 148, p. 414.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kujala, V., Felderbse bei welcher die Ganz Blattspreite in Ralken Umbewandelt Ist, Arch. Soc. Zool. Bot. Fenn. Vanamo, 1953, vol. 8, pp. 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Solov’eva, V.K., New Pea Cultivars, Agrobiologiya, 1958, no. 5, pp. 124–126.

  16. White, O., Studies of Inheritance in Pusim: 2. The Present State of Knowledge of Heredity and Variation in Peas, Proc. Ann. Philos. Soc., 1917, vol. 56, pp. 487–588.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gould, K.S., Cutter, E.G., and Young, J.P.W., Morphogenesis of Compound Leaf in There Genotypes of the Pea, Pisum sativum, Can. J. Bot., 1986, vol. 64, pp. 1268–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wehler, T.C. and Gritton, E.T., Horticultural Evaluation of Eight Foliage Types of Peas Near-Isogenic for the Genes af, tl and st, J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 1981, vol. 106, pp. 272–278.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goldmann, I.L. and Gritton, E.T., Evaluation of the Afila-Tendriled Acacia (afaf-tactac) Pea Foliage Type under Minimal Composition, Crop Sci., 1992, vol. 32, pp. 851–855.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kof, E.M., Kondykov, I.V., Chuvasheva, E.S., Krasnova, M.A., Vinogradova, I.A., and Oorzak, A.S., Reproduction and Evaluation of Some Foliage Types of Peas Near-Isogenic for Genes Af and Tl, Genetic Collections, Isogenic and Alloplasmic Lines, Novosibirsk: Siberian Branch Russ. Acad. Sci., Inst. Cytology and Genetics, 2001, pp. 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sabinin, D.A., Fiziologiya razvitiya rastenii (Physiology of Plant Development), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hofer, J.M.I. and Ellis, T.H.N., The Genetic Control of Patterning in Pea Leaves, Trends Plant Sci., 1998, vol. 3, pp. 439–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khangil’din, V.V., Genetic Features in Pea, Genetika kul’turnykh rastenii: zernobobovye, ovoshchnye, bakh-chevye (Genetics of Crops: Leguminous Plants, Vegetables, and Cucurbitaceous), Fadeeva, T.S. and Burenin, P.I., Eds., Leningrad: Agropromizdat, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sidorova, K.K., Shumnyi, V.K., Glyanenko, M.N., Mishchenko, T.M., Vlasova, E.Yu., and Gaeva, T.A., Genetics and Selection of Legumes-Rhizobia Symbiosis, Tez. 3-go s"ezda “Genetika v XXI veke: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya” (Abst. 3rd Meet. Genetics in the 21st Century: Current State and Perspectives of Development), Moscow, 2004, vol. 1, p. 431.

  25. Pustovoitova, T.N., Drozdova, I.S., Zhdanova, N.E., and Zholkevich, V.N., Leaf Growth, Photosynthetic Rate, and Phytohormone Contents in Cucumis sativus Plants under Progressive Soil Drought, Fiziol. Rast. (Moscow), 2003, vol. 50, pp. 496–498 (Russ. J. Plant Physiol., Engl. Transl., pp. 441-443).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Slavnyi, P.S., Ecology of Water Metabolism, Vodnyi obmen rastenii (Plant Water Relations), Tarchevsky, I.A. and Zholkevich, V.N., Eds., Moscow: Nauka, 1989, pp. 200–218.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kof, E.M., Oorzhak, A.S., Vinogradova, I.A., Kalibernaya, Z.V., Kondykov, I.V., and Chuvasheva, E.S., Morphometry and Physiology of Near-Isogenic Lines of Pisum sativum L. with Different Leaf Morphology, Tr. V Mezhd. simp. “Novye i netraditsionnye rasteniya I perspektivy ikh ispol’zovaniya” (Mater. 5th Int. Symp. New and Non-Traditional Plants and Their Possible Use), Moscow: Russ. Univ. of People Friendship, 2003, vol. 3, pp. 92–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.M. Kof, I.A. Vinogradova, A.S. Oorzhak, Z.V. Kalibernaya, 2006, published in Fiziologiya Rastenii, 2006, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 128–138.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kof, E.M., Vinogradova, I.A., Oorzhak, A.S. et al. The rates of shoot and root growth in intact plants of pea mutants in leaf morphology. Russ J Plant Physiol 53, 116–125 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443706010158

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443706010158

Key words

Navigation